AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 boosts up to 5.10 GHz, and the Intel Core 5 223PE boosts up to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which chip supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The AMD chip features the Radeon 890M, whereas the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What is the production status and market segment for each?

A: Both are Active. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is a Mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel Core 5 223PE is a Desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel part?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, built under the Strix Point codename and the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation. It is a hybrid design combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, which allows the 12-core, 24-thread configuration to fit within a 28 W TDP. The die size is listed at 233 mm².

The Intel Core 5 223PE belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename within the Core 5 generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm Intel process. This is a desktop part with 8 cores and 16 threads, configured with a 65 W TDP. The Intel chip does not use a hybrid core layout; it relies on a conventional core arrangement.

Cache hierarchies differ noticeably. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core and offers a larger 24 MB of shared L3. For workloads that depend on large pooled caches, the Intel chip has an advantage on paper; for per-core L2 sensitivity, Intel also leads.

Memory support is another divider. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus rated at 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The platform differences extend to PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 lanes, which affects expansion bandwidth for storage and accelerators.

The integrated graphics solutions are not comparable in class. AMD pairs the CPU with the Radeon 890M, a high-performance mobile iGPU. Intel pairs its chip with UHD Graphics 730, a basic desktop solution. The AMD part is designed for mobile systems with a 28 W envelope; the Intel part targets desktop builds with a 65 W envelope.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 dominates in multi-threaded productivity and data-heavy workloads. It wins 7 of the 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, and its victories are concentrated in integer math, data compression, encryption, extended instructions, random string sorting, and the PassMark multithread test. The 12-core count with 24 threads gives it a clear edge in parallel tasks that scale across cores.

The AMD part also wins the Cinebench R15 multicore test with a 19.2% margin. This suggests that older rendering workloads and legacy multi-threaded applications respond well to the higher core count and the Zen 5 architecture. The PassMark multithread score of 33349 versus 31124 confirms that general parallel throughput favors AMD.

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins 8 of the 15 benchmarks, and its territory is single-thread performance and modern rendering. It takes Cinebench R23 multicore by 30%, which is a significant reversal from the R15 result. This indicates that the newer Cinebench version scales better with the Intel chip's per-core efficiency and higher boost clock. The Intel part also wins Cinebench R15 single-core, R23 single-core, floating-point math, prime number finding, physics, and PassMark single-thread tests.

The Intel chip's single-thread advantage is substantial. R23 single-core shows a 46.7% lead, and R15 single-core shows a 17.8% lead. For applications that are latency-bound or depend on a single strong core, the Intel chip is clearly superior. The physics test win of 24.1% and the prime number win of 17.6% point to workloads that favor raw clock speed and per-core integer execution.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: AMD has 12 cores and 24 threads, Intel has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.90 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.10 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 28 W for AMD and 65 W for Intel.

Process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm from Intel. The AMD die is 233 mm²; Intel does not list a die size. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 24 MB (shared) for Intel.

Memory support: AMD lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel lists DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 890M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Market segments differ: AMD is Mobile on AMD Socket FP8; Intel is Desktop on Intel Socket 1700. Release dates differ: AMD launched on 2025-01-05, Intel on 2026-03-08. The Intel launch MSRP is $232; AMD has none listed. Both have locked multipliers and support ECC.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results tell a split story. In R15 multicore, AMD wins 3178 versus 2666, a 19.2% margin. But in R23 multicore, Intel wins 26455 versus 18520, a 30% margin. This is the largest delta in the entire benchmark set. The R23 single-core test is even more lopsided: Intel scores 3734 against AMD's 1992, a 46.7% lead. R15 single-core goes to Intel at 376 versus 309, a 17.8% edge.

PassMark tests reveal AMD's strengths. Integer math shows AMD at 120016 versus 99819, a 20.2% win. Random string sorting goes to AMD at 43767 versus 35798, a 22.3% margin. Data compression favors AMD at 403113 versus 346623, a 16.3% lead. Data encryption shows AMD at 20788 versus 18448, a 12.7% win. Extended instructions go to AMD at 28165 versus 24672, a 14.2% margin. The PassMark multithread test goes to AMD at 33349 versus 31124, a 7.1% win.

Intel takes the remaining PassMark tests. Floating-point math goes to Intel at 76468 versus 73493, a 3.9% margin. Prime number finding favors Intel at 159 versus 131, a 17.6% lead. Physics goes to Intel at 2493 versus 1892, a 24.1% win. PassMark single-thread goes to Intel at 4219 versus 4003, a 5.1% margin.

The average benchmark scores place AMD at 50448 with a 90th percentile among all CPUs. Intel sits at 40585 with an 87th percentile. AMD's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13980HX (0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (-0.5%), Intel Core i7-13850HX (-0.6%), and Intel Core i9-14900T (-1.1%). Intel's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 253PE (0.1%), Intel Xeon 6357P (-0.1%), Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (0.2%), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G (-0.3%).

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload type. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the choice for multi-threaded data processing, encryption, compression, and integer-heavy parallel tasks. Its 19.2% win in Cinebench R15 multicore and 20.2% win in integer math show that legacy and general parallel workloads run faster on the 12-core AMD part. The 7.1% PassMark multithread advantage confirms this pattern. For mobile systems where power efficiency matters, the 28 W TDP makes this the only viable option of the two, given the Intel part is a desktop chip.

The Intel Core 5 223PE is the pick for single-thread performance and modern rendering. The 46.7% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core is decisive. The 30% win in R23 multicore shows that the latest Cinebench version rewards Intel's architecture despite fewer cores. The physics win of 24.1% and prime number win of 17.6% indicate that clock-sensitive and latency-sensitive workloads run better on Intel. The 5.20 GHz boost clock and 2.90 GHz base clock support this behavior.

The benchmark results indicate that these chips serve different platforms and different use cases. The AMD chip is a mobile processor with a high-performance integrated GPU, built for thin-and-light systems that still need strong parallel throughput. The Intel chip is a desktop processor with a modest iGPU, aimed at systems where single-thread speed and modern render scaling matter more. Neither chip is a universal winner; the recorded data shows 7 wins for AMD and 8 wins for Intel across the 15 tests. The choice depends on whether the workload favors core count and data throughput or single-core speed and the latest rendering engine.