AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450
Processor U302L
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Processor U302L
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Processor U302L occupy distinctly different positions in the mobile processor landscape. The AMD part is a high-performance, 8-core Zen 5 design aimed at demanding productivity workloads. The Intel U302L is a low-power, 5-core Raptor Lake chip built for efficiency and basic tasks. The benchmark data shows a complete sweep: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 holds every recorded performance win, while the Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark entries in the database.
The AMD processor's strengths are immediately visible across the Cinebench suite. It scores 2457 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 220 in single-core, while Cinebench R23 results show 16054 multi-core and 2010 single-core. These figures place the chip in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capability. The Intel U302L, with its 50th percentile ranking and no recorded benchmark scores, offers no competitive data points in the database.
PassMark results for the AMD part reinforce its dominance in compute-heavy tasks. Data compression reaches 294298, encryption hits 14925, and extended instructions score 20778. Integer math posts 86227, floating point math reaches 52971, and find prime numbers scores 84. The multi-thread test records 24779, physics scores 1337, and random string sorting reaches 32344. Single-thread performance sits at 3955. These numbers describe a processor that handles both parallel workloads and latency-sensitive single-thread tasks with confidence.
The Intel U302L, despite its lower core count and clock speeds, has a role. Its 15 W TDP and 5-core layout suggest a focus on battery life and thermals rather than raw throughput. The database shows no benchmarks for this part, so its relative performance cannot be quantified. The architectural choice of Raptor Lake with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory indicates flexibility in system design, but without measured scores, the data cannot confirm any specific advantage.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 195 mm². It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with L1 cache at 80 KB per core, L2 at 1 MB per core, and L3 at 8 MB. The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, operating at a 28 W TDP. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, and the integrated graphics are Radeon 860M. PCIe connectivity offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU.
The Intel Processor U302L uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process. It has 5 cores and 6 threads, with L1 cache at 80 KB per core, L2 at 1.25 MB per core, and L3 at 10 MB shared. The base clock is 1.20 GHz with a boost clock of 2.40 GHz, running at a 15 W TDP. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, though bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory is not supported. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 80EU, and PCIe is Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU.
The core count difference is substantial: 8 cores versus 5 cores, and 16 threads versus 6 threads. This directly impacts multi-threaded performance, as seen in the AMD part's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16054. The clock speeds also diverge sharply, with the AMD boost clock of 5.10 GHz far exceeding the Intel's 2.40 GHz. Process node differences (4 nm versus 10 nm) suggest the AMD part benefits from denser, more efficient transistors, though the Intel part's lower TDP indicates a different power envelope priority.
Cache configurations vary. The AMD part has a smaller L2 per core (1 MB versus 1.25 MB) but a larger total cache structure when considering L3 (8 MB versus 10 MB). The Intel part's L3 is shared, while the AMD part's L3 is listed without a "shared" designation. These differences influence how each processor handles repeated data access and multi-thread contention.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a full set of benchmark scores, while the Intel Processor U302L has none. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis relies on the AMD part's standalone scores and its nearest rivals.
The AMD processor's average benchmark score is 37093, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i9-12900T with an average score of 37112 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117 with -0.1%, the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135 with -0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161 with -0.2%. These deltas show the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 sits within a fraction of a percent of these established desktop and mobile parts, indicating its performance is competitive with higher-tier chips.
For the Intel Processor U302L, the database records a percentile of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0. This means no measured performance data exists for this part. The 50th percentile is a nominal placement, likely based on its specification class rather than empirical results. Without scores, there is no way to quantify its position relative to the AMD part or any other processor.
The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16054 for the AMD part can be compared against typical mid-range processors, but the database does not provide direct rival scores for this specific test. The single-core score of 2010 indicates strong per-thread performance, which aligns with the 5.10 GHz boost clock. PassMark single-thread at 3955 reinforces this picture.
FAQ
Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Processor U302L boosts to 2.40 GHz.
Q: How do their power envelopes compare?
A: The AMD part has a 28 W TDP, and the Intel part has a 15 W TDP.
Q: What memory types does each support?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor U302L supports DDR4 and DDR5.
Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor U302L does not.
Q: What are their average benchmark scores?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has an average benchmark score of 37093. The Intel Processor U302L has an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting no recorded benchmarks.
The Verdict
The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 delivers measured results across every benchmark category, with an 85th percentile ranking and an average score of 37093. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, sit within 0.2% of its average score, confirming it performs at the level of established mid-range and upper-mid-range processors.
The Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark data, so its actual performance cannot be assessed from the database. Its specification profile, with fewer cores, lower clocks, and a 15 W TDP, positions it as a low-power option. The 5-core, 6-thread configuration and 2.40 GHz boost clock suggest it targets basic productivity and efficiency-focused systems.
For users prioritizing multi-threaded workloads, the AMD part's 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 16054 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, make it the only data-backed choice. For single-thread tasks, the 5.10 GHz boost clock and 2010 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate strong responsiveness. The Intel part offers no measured advantage in any category.
The AMD processor's 4 nm process node and Zen 5 architecture provide a modern foundation, while the Intel part's 10 nm Raptor Lake design is from an earlier generation. The AMD part's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support add capabilities the Intel part lacks. The Intel part does support DDR4, which could enable lower-cost system builds, but the database provides no performance data to validate this trade-off.
The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the superior performer in every measurable way. The Intel Processor U302L remains an unquantified low-power alternative.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 | Intel Processor U302L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 5 |
| Threads | 16 | 6 |
| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |
| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 10 MB (shared) |
| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |
| ECC Memory | Yes | No |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 8 Lanes |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 80EU |
| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-04-07 |
| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $285 |
| Part Number | 100-000001865 | SRPKGQ5CX |