AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is a mobile processor with 8 cores, 16 threads, and a recorded benchmark list. The Intel Processor 300T is a desktop processor with 2 cores, 4 threads, and no recorded benchmark scores. The database contains no matched benchmark results for this pairing, so the comparison rests on the AMD part's absolute scores and the two parts' specification differences.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no matched benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and the Intel Processor 300T. As a result, the recorded head-to-head win count is 0 for both parts. The available benchmark evidence is one-sided: the AMD part has a full list of recorded scores, while the Intel part has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0.

The AMD part's average benchmark score is 37093, which places it at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i9-12900T with an average score of 37112, the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117, the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161. The AMD part trails these parts by 0.1 percent for the first three and by 0.2 percent for the last, a margin that puts it in the same performance band rather than a different tier.

The biggest recorded wins for the AMD part are in multi-threaded and math-heavy tests. Cinebench R23 multicore is 16054, Cinebench R15 multicore is 2457, PassMark multithread is 24779, PassMark integer math is 86227, and PassMark floating point math is 52971. In single-threaded tests, Cinebench R23 single-core is 2010, Cinebench R15 single-core is 220, and PassMark single-thread is 3955. Other recorded PassMark scores include data compression 294298, random string sorting 32344, extended instructions 20778, data encryption 14925, physics 1337, and find prime numbers 84.

The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded scores in any of these tests. Its average benchmark score is 0 and its percentile among all CPUs is 50. Because the Intel part has no benchmark rows, there are no Intel wins to walk through in this section. The only recorded wins belong to the AMD part.

The Verdict

The recorded data points entirely to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 for compute performance. It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16054. Its average benchmark score is 37093, and it sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores, 4 threads, no recorded boost clock, no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile placement.

For a user who needs measured processing throughput, the AMD part is the only part with benchmark evidence. For a user who needs a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700 with DDR4 support and PCIe Gen 5, the Intel part is the only part with those attributes. The data does not provide any benchmark basis for choosing the Intel part over the AMD part.

Architecture Differences

The two parts differ at the foundation. The AMD part uses Zen 5 architecture, codename Gorgon Point, and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part uses Raptor Lake architecture, codename Raptor Lake-S, and belongs to the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. AMD's die is 195 mm², while Intel's die is 163 mm².

Core organization differs sharply. AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads; Intel has 2 cores and 4 threads. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz and its boost clock is 5.10 GHz. Intel's base clock is 3.40 GHz and no boost clock is recorded. TDP is 28 for AMD and 35 for Intel.

Cache layouts also differ. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. AMD has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3. Intel has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3. Memory support differs as well: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, and both use a dual-channel memory bus. AMD records 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while Intel has no recorded memory bandwidth. ECC memory is true for AMD and false for Intel.

Platform features separate the two. AMD uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes; Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. AMD's integrated graphics is Radeon 860M; Intel's is UHD Graphics 710. AMD uses AMD Socket FP8 and is marked as mobile. Intel uses Intel Socket 1700 and is marked as desktop. AMD's release date is 2026-01-04; Intel's release date is 2024-01-07. The AMD part number is 100-000001865; the Intel part number is SRN3K.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300T have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. Its benchmark list is empty, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile among all CPUs is 50.

Q: What is the average benchmark score and percentile of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450?

A: Its average benchmark score is 37093, and it sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which memory types does each support?

A: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD part has ECC memory set to true. The Intel part has ECC memory set to false.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two parts use?

A: AMD uses Radeon 860M. Intel uses UHD Graphics 710.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins on every recorded benchmark in this pairing. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 16054, its PassMark multithread score is 24779, and its PassMark single-thread score is 3955. It also has a specification advantage in core count (8 vs 2), thread count (16 vs 4), boost clock (5.10 GHz vs none), L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s vs none recorded), ECC support (true vs false), and memory flexibility with LPDDR5X. The AMD part is the mobile option with AMD Socket FP8 and a 4 nm TSMC process.

The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark wins. Its specification advantages are desktop-oriented: Intel Socket 1700, DDR4 support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz, a larger L2 per core at 1.25 MB, and a smaller die at 163 mm². The use-case split follows these attributes: AMD for measured compute performance on mobile, Intel for desktop platform features such as DDR4 and PCIe Gen 5.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 | Intel Processor 300T |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 195 mm² | 163 mm² |

| Cores | 8 | 2 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | None recorded |

| TDP | 28 | 35 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | None recorded |

| ECC memory | true | false |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $82 |

| Part number | 100-000001865 | SRN3K |

| Average benchmark score | 37093 | 0 |

| Percentile | 85 | 50 |

| Recorded benchmarks | Full list | Empty |

| Nearest rivals | Listed | None |