AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 225T

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 10 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,457
2,214
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
220
312
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
16,054
21,971
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,010
3,101
passmark_data_compression
294,298
233,998
passmark_data_encryption
14,925
18,289
passmark_extended_instructions
20,778
20,083
passmark_find_prime_numbers
84
284
passmark_floating_point_math
52,971
82,751
passmark_integer_math
86,227
59,543
passmark_multithread
24,779
25,358
passmark_physics
1,337
2,053
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,344
28,774
passmark_single_thread
3,955
4,348
passmark_singlethread
3,955
4,348
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,227
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,302

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Core Ultra 5 225T are fundamentally different processors, one a mobile part and the other a desktop part, yet their benchmark records show a clear split in workload preferences. The data shows the AMD chip wins 5 of the 15 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Intel chip wins 10. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T takes the overall average benchmark score lead through its dominance in single-threaded and floating-point workloads, but the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 counters with massive leads in integer math and data compression.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive win for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 86,227 against 59,543 for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, a 44.8% advantage. This is the largest delta in either direction across all tests. The AMD chip also delivers a 25.8% lead in data compression, scoring 294,298 versus 233,998. These two results indicate that the AMD processor's architecture handles integer-heavy and compression workloads with substantially higher throughput.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T counters with equally decisive wins in several areas. In PassMark find prime numbers, the Intel chip scores 284 versus 84 for the AMD chip, a massive 70.4% advantage. The Intel part also leads by 36% in floating-point math, scoring 82,751 against 52,971. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel chip scores 21,971 versus 16,054, a 26.9% lead. The single-core Cinebench R23 result is even more lopsided: Intel scores 3,101 against 2,010, a 35.2% margin.

The Cinebench R15 multicore test is the one rendering workload where AMD takes the win, scoring 2,457 versus 2,214, an 11% lead. This contrasts sharply with the R23 multicore result, where Intel leads by 26.9%, suggesting the two processors scale differently across rendering benchmark versions. In PassMark multithread, the Intel chip edges ahead by 2.3%, scoring 25,358 versus 24,779. The Intel chip also wins PassMark physics by 34.9%, scoring 2,053 against 1,337, and PassMark data encryption by 18.4%, scoring 18,289 versus 14,925.

In PassMark extended instructions, the AMD chip takes a narrow 3.5% win, scoring 20,778 against 20,083. The AMD chip also wins random string sorting by 12.4%, scoring 32,344 versus 28,774. For single-thread performance, the Intel chip leads PassMark single-thread by 9%, scoring 4,348 versus 3,955, and Cinebench R15 singlecore by 29.5%, scoring 312 versus 220. The overall average benchmark score reflects this split: the AMD chip averages 37,093, while the Intel chip averages 30,468, but this is skewed by the PassMark integer and compression tests where AMD's scores are exceptionally high.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use different manufacturing nodes and core designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses a 3 nm TSMC process with a larger 243 mm² die and 17,800 million transistors. The AMD chip is built on Zen 5 architecture with the Gorgon Point codename, while the Intel chip uses Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 10 threads. This means the AMD chip uses simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count, while the Intel chip runs one thread per core. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel chip has a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache total. The Intel chip has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache aligns with its multicore rendering lead, while the AMD chip's per-core L2 configuration may contribute to its integer math performance.

Memory support also differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it supports ECC memory. The Intel chip supports only DDR5 with a dual-channel bus but offers higher bandwidth at 102.4 GB/s, and it does not support ECC. The Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The AMD chip integrates Radeon 860M graphics, while the Intel chip integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU.

The AMD chip is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8 with a 28 W TDP. The Intel chip is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1851 with a 65 W TDP. The AMD chip belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, while the Intel chip belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. The AMD chip has a release date of January 4, 2026, while the Intel chip has a release date of December 31, 2024. Both processors are production active, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is the stronger processor for rendering, physics simulation, encryption, and prime number calculations. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,971 versus 16,054, along with a 34.9% lead in PassMark physics and a 70.4% lead in prime numbers, makes it the clear choice for workloads that rely on floating-point throughput and large shared caches. The Intel chip also holds a solid single-thread advantage, with a 35.2% lead in Cinebench R23 singlecore and a 9% lead in PassMark single-thread.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the better option for integer-heavy workloads and data manipulation. Its 44.8% lead in integer math and 25.8% lead in data compression are substantial, and it also wins in random string sorting by 12.4% and extended instructions by 3.5%. The AMD chip's Cinebench R15 multicore win by 11% shows it can outperform the Intel chip in certain rendering scenarios, even if the R23 test favors Intel.

The overall average benchmark score favors the AMD chip at 37,093 versus 30,468, but this is driven by the outlier scores in integer math and data compression. The Intel chip's 82nd percentile versus the AMD chip's 85th percentile among all CPUs reflects a similar pattern: the AMD chip sits slightly higher in the distribution due to its specialized strengths. For a desktop user running a mix of productivity and creative workloads, the Intel chip's broader wins in more common tasks like rendering and physics make it the more balanced choice. For a mobile user focused on data processing and compression, the AMD chip's targeted advantages are compelling.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

  • Cores: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores; Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores.
  • Threads: AMD has 16 threads; Intel has 10 threads.
  • Base clock: AMD is 2.00 GHz; Intel is 2.50 GHz.
  • Boost clock: AMD is 5.10 GHz; Intel is 4.90 GHz.
  • TDP: AMD is 28 W; Intel is 65 W.
  • Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8; Intel uses Intel Socket 1851.
  • Architecture: AMD uses Zen 5; Intel uses Arrow Lake.
  • Codename: AMD is Gorgon Point; Intel is Arrow Lake-S.
  • Generation: AMD is Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c); Intel is Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake).
  • Process node: AMD is 4 nm; Intel is 3 nm.
  • Transistors: AMD has no recorded count; Intel has 17,800 million.
  • Die size: AMD is 195 mm²; Intel is 243 mm².
  • L1 cache: AMD is 80 KB per core; Intel is 192 KB per core.
  • L2 cache: AMD is 1 MB per core; Intel is 3 MB per core.
  • L3 cache: AMD is 8 MB; Intel is 20 MB shared.
  • Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel supports DDR5 only.
  • Memory bandwidth: AMD is 89.6 GB/s; Intel is 102.4 GB/s.
  • ECC memory: AMD supports it; Intel does not.
  • PCIe: AMD is Gen 4 with 16 lanes; Intel is Gen 5 with 20 lanes.
  • Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 860M; Intel uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU.
  • Market segment: AMD is Mobile; Intel is Desktop.
  • Release date: AMD is January 4, 2026; Intel is December 31, 2024.
  • Part number: AMD is 100-000001865; Intel is unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. It scores 3,101 in Cinebench R23 singlecore versus 2,010 for the AMD chip, a 35.2% lead, and 4,348 in PassMark single-thread versus 3,955, a 9% lead.

Q: Which processor wins in integer math performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450. It scores 86,227 in PassMark integer math versus 59,543 for the Intel chip, a 44.8% advantage.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 89.6 GB/s. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which chip has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel chip has more cores at 10 versus 8, but the AMD chip has more threads at 16 versus 10 because of simultaneous multithreading.

Q: How do the two processors compare in data compression?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 leads by 25.8%, scoring 294,298 in PassMark data compression versus 233,998 for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins in PassMark integer math, data compression, random string sorting, extended instructions, and Cinebench R15 multicore. These wins point to workloads that process large datasets, perform arithmetic operations on integers, sort or reorganize data, and handle instruction-level parallelism. The 44.8% lead in integer math and 25.8% lead in data compression are the largest margins in its favor, making it the stronger choice for data analytics, file compression tools, and database operations.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins in Cinebench R23 multicore, Cinebench R23 singlecore, Cinebench R15 singlecore, PassMark floating-point math, PassMark physics, PassMark data encryption, PassMark find prime numbers, PassMark multithread, and PassMark single-thread. The 70.4% lead in find prime numbers and the 36% lead in floating-point math are its most dominant results. These wins cover rendering, physics simulation, encryption, and general single-threaded application performance. The Intel chip's 10 physical cores and 20 MB of shared L3 cache support its multicore rendering lead, while its higher base clock of 2.50 GHz contributes to single-thread wins.

The overall win count favors the Intel chip at 10 wins versus 5 for the AMD chip, but the magnitude of AMD's wins in integer math and compression is larger than most of Intel's individual margins. The PassMark multithread result is nearly tied, with Intel leading by only 2.3%, indicating that total thread throughput is similar despite the different core and thread configurations. The choice between these processors depends on whether the primary workload is floating-point and rendering, favoring Intel, or integer and data manipulation, favoring AMD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 PRO 450
Ultra 5 225T
Core Specs
Cores
8
10 +25.0%
Threads
16
10 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.5 +25.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.5 +25.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Multiplier
20
25 +25.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
114 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Arrow Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Transistors
—
17,800 million
Die Size
195 mm²
243 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
—
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
1900 MHz up to 4.4 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001865
unknown
Package
FP8
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 Details View Core Ultra 5 225T Details