AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core i7-13700 Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13700 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 are both 85th-percentile performers, yet they are fundamentally different designs. The data shows a decisive victory for the Intel part in nearly every benchmark, with a 14-to-1 win margin, driven by its superior core count and cache. However, the AMD chip matches Intel in single-core Cinebench R23 and operates in a completely different power envelope, making the choice a matter of workload priority rather than raw capability.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 dominates multi-threaded tests. It leads by 58% in Cinebench R23 multicore (25369 vs 16054) and by 46.8% in PassMark multithread (36387 vs 24779).

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 competitive in single-core performance?

A: Yes, nearly identical. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD scores 2010 versus the Intel's 2008.5, a 0.1% difference in AMD's favor. In PassMark single-thread, the Intel wins by only 3.7% (4101 vs 3955).

Q: What are the biggest performance gaps between the two?

A: The most significant Intel advantages appear in floating-point math (84.5% ahead), prime number finding (75% ahead), and data encryption (71.9% ahead). The smallest Intel lead is in single-threaded PassMark tests at 3.7%.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093. The delta between them is only 0.1%.

Q: What are the architectural highlights of each CPU?

A: The Intel chip uses Raptor Lake with 16 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache. The AMD chip uses Zen 5 (Gorgon Point) with 8 cores and 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which CPU is designed for which market segment?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 is a desktop processor on Socket 1700, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is a mobile processor on Socket FP8.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent opposing design philosophies. The Intel Core i7-13700 is a desktop-class Raptor Lake-S part built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry, featuring a hybrid architecture with 16 cores and 24 threads. It carries a substantial 30 MB of shared L3 cache, with 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core. This large cache hierarchy is a key factor in its benchmark dominance.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is a mobile chip from the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series, codenamed Gorgon Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It uses a Zen 5 architecture with 8 cores and 16 threads, and its cache is significantly smaller: 8 MB of L3, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part also integrates a Radeon 860M GPU, whereas the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.

Connectivity and memory also differ. The Intel processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a listed bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 without a specified bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The power and physical characteristics are starkly different. The Intel chip has a 65 W TDP and a die size of 257 mm², while the AMD chip has a 28 W TDP and a 195 mm² die. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz; the AMD has a 2.00 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost. The Intel was released in January 2023, while the AMD is dated later.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-13700 wins 14 of the 15 head-to-head tests. The only exception is Cinebench R23 single-core, where the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins by a marginal 0.1% (2010 vs 2008.5).

The Intel’s largest victories are in compute-heavy tasks. In PassMark floating-point math, it scores 97723 versus 52971, a 84.5% advantage. In PassMark find prime numbers, it leads 147 to 84, a 75% gap. Data encryption shows a 71.9% lead (25653 vs 14925). These results indicate a substantial advantage in raw arithmetic and cryptographic workloads.

Multi-core rendering also heavily favors Intel. Cinebench R23 multicore shows a 58% lead (25369 vs 16054), and Cinebench R15 multicore shows a 50.3% lead (3692 vs 2457). PassMark multithread confirms the trend with a 46.8% difference (36387 vs 24779). Data compression follows suit at 50.8% (443900 vs 294298).

The Intel advantage narrows in certain single-threaded and integer tasks. PassMark integer math shows a 61.2% lead (138974 vs 86227), while PassMark physics shows a 53.6% lead (2053 vs 1337). Extended instructions yield a 27.9% lead (26578 vs 20778). Random string sorting is 43.5% faster (46418 vs 32344).

The smallest Intel win is in PassMark single-thread, where it scores 4101 versus 3955, a 3.7% edge. This is consistent with the near-tie in Cinebench R23 single-core, suggesting that per-clock efficiency is comparable, but the Intel’s higher core count and boost clock give it the edge in sustained workloads.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows the Intel Core i7-13700 is the superior performer for almost any task. With a 58% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore and an 84.5% lead in floating-point math, it is overwhelmingly faster in multi-threaded and math-intensive scenarios. The 16-core, 24-thread configuration with 30 MB of L3 cache provides a structural advantage that the 8-core Zen 5 chip cannot overcome.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is not without merit. It matches the Intel in Cinebench R23 single-core performance and comes within 3.7% in PassMark single-thread. It also operates at a 28 W TDP compared to Intel’s 65 W, and it has a smaller die size. For a mobile platform, this efficiency is a critical factor.

However, for a desktop user prioritizing throughput, the Intel part is the clear choice. Its average benchmark score of 37135 is slightly higher than the AMD’s 37093, but the distribution of wins is lopsided. The Intel chip wins 14 out of 15 tests, and its losses are negligible. The verdict is straightforward: pick the Intel Core i7-13700 for performance, or the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 for a mobile, power-efficient design.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Intel Core i7-13700 has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel base clock is 2.10 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for AMD, and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz.

Cache sizes differ significantly. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 30 MB of shared L3, while the AMD has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The Intel uses a 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die, while the AMD uses a 4 nm process with a 195 mm² die.

The TDP is a major differentiator: the Intel is rated at 65 W, the AMD at 28 W. The Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a specified bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel uses PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD uses PCIe Gen 4. The Intel socket is Socket 1700, and the AMD is Socket FP8. The integrated graphics differ as well: UHD Graphics 770 for Intel versus Radeon 860M for AMD.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700 wins in every multi-threaded and math-heavy category. It is the choice for Cinebench R23 multicore (25369), PassMark multithread (36387), and all PassMark math tests, including integer (138974), floating-point (97723), and prime numbers (147). It is also superior in data compression (443900), encryption (25653), extended instructions (26578), physics (2053), and random string sorting (46418). For any desktop workload that scales with cores and cache, the Intel part is the winner.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins in one specific scenario: Cinebench R23 single-core, with a score of 2010 versus 2008.5. It is also competitive in PassMark single-thread, trailing by only 3.7%. For a mobile device where power consumption (28 W TDP) and thermals are critical, and where single-threaded responsiveness is the priority, the AMD chip is the appropriate selection.

In practical terms, the Intel part suits content creators, data analysts, and users running heavy batch workloads. The AMD part suits mobile professionals who need long battery life and adequate single-core performance for everyday tasks. The data does not support using the AMD chip for heavy multi-threaded work, but it does support its use in power-constrained environments.