AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and the Intel Core i5-14400 split sharply along workload types. Intel wins 9 of the 15 recorded comparisons, while AMD takes 6, but the margins tell a more interesting story than the raw win count.

Intel's largest advantage appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 3009 against AMD's 2010, a 33.2% lead. That is the single biggest gap in either direction across all tests. Cinebench R23 multi-core also favors Intel decisively: 21315 versus 16054, a 24.7% margin. Cinebench R15 single-core shows Intel ahead by 27.4% (303 versus 220), and R15 multi-core goes the other way, with AMD leading 2457 to 2148, a 14.4% advantage.

The PassMark suite reveals a more nuanced picture. AMD wins integer math by 5.1% (86227 versus 82017), extended instructions by 4.9% (20778 versus 19816), and prime number finding by 5% (84 versus 80). AMD also takes single-thread performance in PassMark, scoring 3955 against Intel's 3741, a 5.7% gain. Intel counters with floating-point math, where it leads 61549 to 52971, a 13.9% margin, and data compression, where it holds a 6.6% edge (314995 versus 294298). Intel also wins data encryption by 10.8% (16731 versus 14925).

The closest contests are nearly statistical ties. PassMark random string sorting shows Intel at 32346 versus AMD at 32344, a 0% difference. PassMark multithread favors Intel by just 1.2% (25080 versus 24779), and PassMark physics goes to Intel by 4.2% (1396 versus 1337). These narrow margins suggest the two processors are effectively equivalent for mixed-thread workloads that do not heavily favor either architecture's strengths.

In the database's overall average benchmark score, AMD sits at 37093 with an 85th percentile ranking across all CPUs, while Intel posts 32115 with an 82nd percentile. AMD's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, delta -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37117, -0.1%), and Intel Core i7-13700 (37135, -0.1%). Intel's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, 0%), Intel Core i7-13705H (32076, 0.1%), and Intel Core i5-14450HX (32040, 0.2%). The delta percentages place AMD's overall score just below a cluster of higher-tier desktop and mobile parts, while Intel's score lands in a lower band, yet the individual benchmark deltas show Intel beating AMD in most heavy compute tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD uses a Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the codename Gorgon Point and a die size of 195 mm². Intel uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, on a 10 nm Intel process with a die size of 215 mm². The process node difference alone explains part of the efficiency gap: AMD's 4 nm node is denser and newer than Intel's 10 nm node.

Core counts differ as well. AMD packs 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel offers 10 cores and 16 threads. Intel's extra cores do not translate into a thread advantage, but they do provide more physical compute units for parallel workloads. Both parts lock their multipliers, so neither offers manual overclocking.

Cache layouts diverge significantly. AMD assigns 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3. Intel also uses 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 is 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 is 20 MB shared. The larger L3 on Intel likely contributes to its strong showing in data compression and encryption, where larger working sets benefit from more on-die cache. AMD's smaller L3 may explain its lead in integer math and extended instructions, where the Zen 5 core's efficiency per clock plays a larger role.

Memory support differs in scope. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel access and a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but the database records no specific bandwidth figure for Intel. Both CPUs support ECC memory, which matters for workstation and reliability-focused builds.

PCIe connectivity also separates the two. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Intel's newer PCIe generation offers double the per-lane bandwidth for compatible devices, though the practical impact depends on the storage and expansion cards used.

Integrated graphics differ in class. AMD pairs the CPU with a Radeon 860M, a substantially more capable iGPU for gaming and media tasks. Intel uses UHD Graphics 730, which handles basic display output but trails in 3D performance. AMD's socket is FP8, a mobile platform, while Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop platform. That distinction drives the entire usage profile: AMD is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, while Intel is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP. The TDP gap of 37 W explains why Intel can sustain higher clocks under load despite its older process node.

Clock speeds reinforce the design split. AMD bases at 2.00 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz. Intel bases at 2.50 GHz and boosts to 4.70 GHz. AMD's higher boost clock gives it the single-thread PassMark win, while Intel's higher base clock helps it maintain steadier throughput in sustained multi-core workloads.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split by platform and workload. The Intel Core i5-14400 is the stronger multi-core compute part for desktop users who need raw throughput in Cinebench R23, floating-point math, and data compression. Its 33.2% single-core lead in Cinebench R23 and 24.7% multi-core lead over AMD in the same test make it the better choice for rendering, scientific computing, and heavy productivity software that scales across cores.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins in integer-heavy and instruction-heavy tasks, plus single-thread PassMark. Its 5.7% single-thread PassMark advantage and 5.1% integer math lead suggest it handles general-purpose code efficiently. The 4 nm process and 28 W TDP indicate a part designed for sustained mobile operation, not peak desktop performance. The Radeon 860M iGPU further positions it as an all-in-one mobile solution where discrete graphics are not available.

For a desktop workstation that prioritizes multi-core rendering and cache-sensitive workloads, the Intel part's 20 MB L3 and 10 physical cores deliver measurable gains. For a thin-and-light laptop that needs strong single-thread responsiveness, efficient power draw, and a capable integrated GPU, the AMD part is the logical pick. The database's overall scores confirm this: AMD's 37093 average places it near desktop-class rivals like the Core i9-12900T, while Intel's 32115 average sits closer to mobile H-series chips, but the head-to-head deltas show Intel beating AMD in the specific tests that matter most for sustained compute.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has an average benchmark score of 37093, compared to the Intel Core i5-14400's 32115.

Q: How large is Intel's lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: Intel scores 21315 against AMD's 16054, a 24.7% advantage.

Q: Does AMD win any single-thread test?

A: Yes. AMD wins PassMark single-thread with 3955 versus Intel's 3741, a 5.7% margin. Intel wins both Cinebench single-core tests.

Q: What memory types does each CPU support?

A: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which CPU has the larger L3 cache?

A: Intel has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD has 8 MB of L3.

Where Each One Wins

AMD wins in PassMark single-thread, integer math, extended instructions, prime number finding, Cinebench R15 multi-core, and random string sorting by a 0% tie that the database credits to Intel by a single point. The 5.7% single-thread PassMark win shows AMD's Zen 5 cores deliver strong per-clock performance. The 5.1% integer math and 4.9% extended instruction leads indicate efficiency in general-purpose and SIMD-heavy code. The 14.4% Cinebench R15 multi-core win suggests AMD's core architecture handles lightly threaded multi-core bursts well, which fits a mobile device with a 28 W TDP.

Intel wins in Cinebench R15 single-core, Cinebench R23 single-core, Cinebench R23 multi-core, data compression, data encryption, floating-point math, multithread, physics, and random string sorting (by one point). The 33.2% and 24.7% Cinebench R23 leads are the headline results, showing Intel's 10 physical cores and 20 MB L3 dominate sustained rendering and heavily parallel compute. The 13.9% floating-point lead and 10.8% encryption lead point to strengths in scientific and security workloads. The 6.6% data compression lead reflects Intel's cache advantage.

The use-case split is straightforward. AMD wins for mobile users who need efficient single-thread responsiveness and integer-heavy workloads, plus a stronger integrated GPU in the Radeon 860M. Intel wins for desktop users who run multi-threaded rendering, floating-point simulation, encryption, and compression tasks, where its higher TDP and larger cache translate directly into benchmark victories. The 65 W TDP Intel part demands more power, but the recorded data shows it converts that power into higher scores in the majority of tests.