AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Core 7 150HL occupy different corners of the mobile and desktop computing spectrum. The AMD part is a Zen 5 based mobile processor built for thin-and-light laptops, while the Intel part is a Raptor Lake-PS desktop chip aimed at embedded and all-in-one systems. Benchmark data in the database covers the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 extensively, while the Intel Core 7 150HL currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This means the analysis below draws on measured results for the AMD processor and compares it against its nearest rivals in the database, with the Intel processor assessed through its specification profile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and the Intel Core 7 150HL. The Intel Core 7 150HL has an empty benchmark record, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile ranking of 50 among all CPUs. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a full set of measured scores across Cinebench and Passmark workloads, an average benchmark score of 37093, and a percentile ranking of 85.

Because there is no direct comparison data, the nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 provide the reference points. The AMD chip sits at an average benchmark score of 37093. Its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900T, scores 37112, a delta of -0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37117, also a -0.1 percent delta. The Intel Core i7-13700 scores 37135, again -0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 7735H scores 37161, a -0.2 percent delta. These margins are within one tenth of a percent, placing the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 statistically level with those four established processors.

Looking at the AMD processor's own benchmark results, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 16054, and the single-core score is 2010. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 2457 and the single-core score is 220. Passmark results show a multi-thread score of 24779 and a single-thread score of 3955. The floating point math score is 52971, integer math is 86227, and extended instructions score is 20778. Data compression scores 294298, data encryption scores 14925, and random string sorting scores 32344. Physics tests score 1337, and prime number finding scores 84.

These numbers indicate a processor that performs strongly in single-threaded workloads, given the 2010 Cinebench R23 single-core result and the 3955 Passmark single-thread score. The multi-core results, while solid for an 8-core part, show the expected scaling from 8 cores and 16 threads. The Passmark integer math score of 86227 exceeds the floating point score of 52971, suggesting the architecture handles integer-heavy tasks with particular efficiency.

The Intel Core 7 150HL, with no benchmark data, cannot be positioned against these numbers. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs in the database, but that ranking is derived from average benchmark scores that are currently unrecorded, so the ranking carries no measured weight.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins in every measured category solely because it has recorded data. The Intel Core 7 150HL has no benchmark scores, so there is no empirical basis for a win in any workload.

For the AMD processor, the strongest performance areas are data compression (294298 in Passmark), integer math (86227), floating point math (52971), and random string sorting (32344). These are throughput-oriented tasks that benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads. The single-thread performance, reflected in the 2010 Cinebench R23 single-core score and the 3955 Passmark single-thread score, indicates strong per-core efficiency from the Zen 5 architecture.

The Intel Core 7 150HL, based on its architecture and specifications, would be expected to compete in multi-threaded workloads given its 14 cores and 20 threads. However, without measured benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm any advantage. The specification profile shows a higher base clock of 2.40 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for the AMD chip, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 5.10 GHz for the AMD chip. The Intel part has a larger L3 cache (24 MB shared versus 8 MB for AMD) and a higher TDP of 45 watts versus 28 watts. These specifications suggest potential strengths in sustained multi-core workloads and cache-sensitive applications, but the absence of benchmark data leaves these as unverified possibilities.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has an average benchmark score of 37093. The Intel Core 7 150HL has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 150HL ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-12900T?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has an average benchmark score of 37093, while the Intel Core i9-12900T has an average score of 37112. The delta is -0.1 percent, meaning the two processors perform within one tenth of one percent of each other.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 16054, and the single-core score is 2010.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150HL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The Intel Core 7 150HL has an empty benchmark array in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: What is the core and thread count for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several core specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks differ: the AMD chip runs at 2.00 GHz, the Intel chip at 2.40 GHz. Boost clocks also differ: the AMD chip boosts to 5.10 GHz, the Intel chip to 5.00 GHz.

Thermal design power shows a significant gap. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts. This 17-watt difference indicates a higher power envelope for the Intel part, which aligns with its larger core count.

Memory support differs in type. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has a rated memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no memory bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD processor supports ECC memory (true), while the Intel processor does not (false).

PCI Express lanes differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 7 150HL provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part offers double the CPU-attached PCIe lanes.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD chip uses the Radeon 860M, while the Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. Market segment also differs: the AMD part is classified as Mobile, while the Intel part is classified as Desktop.

The socket types are different. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 7 150HL uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part has a part number listed as "unknown", while the AMD part has a specific part number.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental architecture separates these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The die size is 195 mm².

The Intel Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-PS, part of the Core 7 generation. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel. The die size is not recorded in the database.

Cache structures differ significantly. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has three times the L3 cache capacity and double the per-core L2 cache.

The AMD processor combines Zen 5 cores with Zen 5c cores, as indicated by its generation field "(Zen 5 / Zen 5c)". The Intel processor uses Raptor Lake cores, which are a hybrid of performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact core composition.

Both processors have integrated graphics, but the architectures differ. The AMD Radeon 860M is based on the RDNA graphics architecture integrated into the Zen 5 mobile package. The Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is based on Intel's Xe architecture integrated into the Raptor Lake die.

The memory controllers differ. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel memory bus and a rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel memory bus, but has no recorded bandwidth figure. The AMD processor includes ECC memory support, while the Intel processor does not.

The manufacturing process difference is notable: 4 nm TSMC for AMD versus 10 nm Intel for the Intel part. This process advantage for AMD contributes to the lower TDP of 28 watts versus 45 watts for the Intel part, despite a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 5.00 GHz.

The Verdict

The benchmark data in the database decisively favors the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, but that conclusion rests entirely on the absence of measured results for the Intel Core 7 150HL. The AMD processor has a comprehensive set of scores across Cinebench R15, Cinebench R23, and Passmark workloads, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 37093. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i9-12900T, AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i7-13700, and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, all score within 0.2 percent of the AMD chip. This places the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 in the upper tier of mainstream processors.

The Intel Core 7 150HL, with no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, cannot be assessed on measured performance. Its specifications suggest a different design point: 14 cores and 20 threads, a 2.40 GHz base clock, 24 MB of L3 cache, and a 45-watt TDP. These specifications point toward a processor intended for multi-threaded desktop workloads, but without benchmark data, any performance claim remains unverified.

For users selecting between these two processors, the data supports the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 for anyone who needs verified performance across single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The 85th percentile ranking, the strong Cinebench R23 scores of 16054 multi-core and 2010 single-core, and the Passmark single-thread score of 3955 all indicate a capable mobile processor. The Intel Core 7 150HL offers a higher core count and larger cache, but the database provides no measured evidence of its performance. The choice, based strictly on available data, favors the AMD processor for any workload where benchmark results matter.