AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Core 5 211TE occupy different corners of the processor market, one a mobile part and the other a desktop chip. The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between them, with the AMD processor winning all 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 37093, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 211TE averages 15370, sitting in the 69th percentile. This article breaks down the benchmark results, architectural differences, and use cases based solely on the database measurements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results indicate a dominant performance advantage for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 across every measured workload. The largest single-threaded win appears in the PassMark single-thread test, where the AMD scores 3955 against Intel's 1408, a delta of 180.9%. This massive gap in single-thread performance is confirmed by the Cinebench R23 single-core test, where AMD scores 2010 versus 1722, a 16.7% advantage, and the Cinebench R15 single-core test, where AMD leads 220 to 173, a 27.2% delta.

Multi-threaded workloads show a similar pattern, though the margins vary. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 16054 compared to the Intel Core 5 211TE's 12201, a 31.6% lead. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test reveals an even larger gap: AMD scores 2457 against Intel's 1229, a 99.9% delta, meaning the AMD chip roughly doubles the Intel chip's output in that test.

The PassMark suite exposes the most extreme differences in specialized workloads. Integer math shows the AMD at 86227 versus Intel's 33991, a 153.7% delta. Extended instructions favor AMD by 141.2%, with scores of 20778 and 8615 respectively. Data compression results show AMD at 294298 against 133434, a 120.6% lead. Floating-point math delivers a 102.6% advantage for AMD, scoring 52971 versus 26150. Data encryption shows AMD at 14925 against 7231, a 106.4% delta. Random string sorting gives AMD a 118% edge, 32344 versus 14838. The PassMark multithread test shows AMD at 24779 versus 11685, a 112.1% advantage.

The closest contest in the entire dataset is the PassMark physics test, where AMD scores 1337 and Intel scores 1278, a modest 4.6% delta. The find prime numbers test also shows a relatively small gap, with AMD at 84 versus Intel's 72, a 16.7% difference. These two tests indicate that the Intel chip is comparatively stronger in certain integer-heavy or physics-related routines than in other areas, though it still loses both matchups.

For context on the AMD side, the nearest rival to the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the Intel Core i9-12900T with an average score of 37112, a negligible delta of -0.1%, followed by the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117, also -0.1%. The Intel Core 5 211TE's nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7543 at 15477, a -0.7% delta, meaning the Intel chip is slightly below that server part. The data confirms that the AMD processor competes in a much higher performance tier than the Intel processor.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC and has a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename within the Core 5 generation and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm².

Core and thread counts differ. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 10 cores and 16 threads. Despite having two fewer physical cores, the AMD chip delivers substantially higher multi-threaded scores, which points to a significant per-core efficiency advantage. The cache layouts also diverge. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD chip uses 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache differs more substantially: AMD has 8 MB total, while Intel has 20 MB shared.

Clock speeds favor AMD. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Core 5 211TE runs at a 1.70 GHz base and a 4.80 GHz boost. The AMD chip also carries a lower TDP of 28 watts against Intel's 45 watts, meaning it delivers higher performance within a lower thermal envelope.

Memory support shows different compatibility ranges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The measured memory bandwidth favors AMD at 89.6 GB/s versus Intel's 76.8 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory.

Platform features differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses the AMD Socket FP8 and integrates a Radeon 860M graphics solution. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses Intel Socket 1700 and integrates UHD Graphics 730. PCIe connectivity favors Intel on generation, with Gen 5 support against AMD's Gen 4, though both provide 16 CPU lanes. The AMD chip is a mobile market segment part, while the Intel chip is a desktop segment part. The AMD chip was released in 2026, while the Intel chip was released in 2025.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows a one-sided distribution of wins. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins all 15 recorded comparisons, which means there is no measured workload where the Intel Core 5 211TE comes out ahead. That said, the relative margins reveal where the Intel chip is least disadvantaged. The PassMark physics test shows the narrowest gap at 4.6%, suggesting that the Intel processor handles physics-type calculations more competitively than other workload types. The find prime numbers test also shows a relatively small 16.7% delta, indicating that prime number computation is another relative strength for the Intel part.

For the AMD processor, the largest wins come in integer math, extended instructions, and single-thread performance. The 153.7% lead in integer math and the 141.2% lead in extended instructions show that the Zen 5 architecture delivers outsized gains in these specific computational tasks. The 180.9% single-thread advantage is the standout result, indicating that the AMD chip's peak clock speed and architecture efficiency translate into a massive per-thread performance lead.

The data compression and encryption tests also show strong AMD advantages at 120.6% and 106.4% respectively. These are common enterprise and productivity workloads, so the AMD chip's dominance there matters for real-world use. The floating-point math advantage of 102.6% further reinforces the AMD chip's strength in numerically intensive tasks.

The multi-threaded Cinebench R15 result deserves attention. The 99.9% delta means the AMD chip nearly doubles the Intel chip's score despite using fewer physical cores. This suggests the Intel Core 5 211TE's 10-core configuration does not scale effectively in this workload, possibly due to lower clock speeds and architectural efficiency differences.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 outperforms the Intel Core 5 211TE in every recorded benchmark, with an average benchmark score of 37093 compared to 15370. The AMD chip sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel chip sits in the 69th percentile. The AMD processor also achieves this with a lower TDP of 28 watts versus 45 watts, a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.80 GHz, and a smaller die size of 195 mm² versus 215 mm².

The Intel Core 5 211TE does offer some platform advantages. It supports PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD chip only supports Gen 4. It also has a larger L3 cache at 20 MB shared versus AMD's 8 MB, and it supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which could matter for system builders with existing DDR4 infrastructure. The Intel chip also has a launch MSRP of $221, a detail that may factor into purchasing decisions.

For mobile users, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the clear choice based on performance data. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration with Zen 5 architecture delivers leading single-thread and multi-thread results within a 28-watt TDP. For desktop users who need DDR4 support or PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, the Intel Core 5 211TE offers those features, but the benchmark data shows it trails the AMD chip substantially in every measured workload.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has an average benchmark score of 37093, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has an average score of 15370.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: In the PassMark single-thread test, the AMD chip scores 3955 against Intel's 1408, a delta of 180.9%. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD leads 2010 to 1722, a 16.7% advantage.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth figures?

A: The AMD processor has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and the Intel Core 5 211TE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 | Intel Core 5 211TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Not specified |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2025-01-12 |