AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Core 3 201E occupy different corners of the processor market, and the benchmark data reflects a clear separation in capability. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is a mobile-first processor built on a modern 4 nm process, while the Core 3 201E is a desktop part on Intel’s 10 nm node. Across every recorded benchmark, the AMD part finishes ahead, with the largest margins appearing in heavily multithreaded and math-intensive workloads. The Core 3 201E does hold advantages in platform features, including PCIe Gen 5 support and a higher base clock, but the performance gap in application tests is substantial. The average benchmark score for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 37093, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 3 201E averages 19056 and sits in the 73rd percentile. The following analysis breaks down the head-to-head results, architectural differences, and the use cases where each processor makes sense.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins all 15 head-to-head comparisons recorded in the database. The most decisive victory comes in PassMark integer math, where the AMD chip scores 86227 against 43894 for the Intel part, a delta of 96.4%. This near-doubling of integer throughput reflects the combination of 8 cores, 16 threads, and the Zen 5 architecture. The second-largest margin is in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the AMD processor scores 2457 versus 1271, a 93.3% advantage. That result is particularly telling, as it shows the Ryzen part delivering almost twice the multi-threaded rendering performance of the Core 3 201E.

The extended instructions test also shows a wide gap. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 20778, while the Core 3 201E manages 11035, a difference of 88.3%. Random string sorting follows at 81.9%, with scores of 32344 and 17783 respectively. Data compression is another strong win for AMD, with a 79.3% delta (294298 versus 164160). These results indicate that the AMD processor is not just faster in raw compute, but also in memory-bound and data-processing tasks.

The PassMark multi-thread score favors the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 by 67%, with 24779 against 14839. Data encryption shows a 67.1% edge (14925 versus 8931), and floating-point math is 59.3% ahead (52971 versus 33260). Find prime numbers, a test sensitive to integer and memory latency, still goes to AMD by 47.4% (84 versus 57). Even the closest comparisons favor the AMD part. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 27.3% lead (16054 versus 12613), and single-core tests are closer but still decisive. Cinebench R15 single-core gives AMD a 22.9% edge (220 versus 179), Cinebench R23 single-core a 12.9% lead (2010 versus 1780), and PassMark single-thread a 13.6% advantage (3955 versus 3482). The physics test, at 17.2% (1337 versus 1141), rounds out a clean sweep.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the faster processor in every measured workload. Its average benchmark score of 37093 is roughly double the Core 3 201E’s 19056, and it ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs compared to the Intel part’s 73rd. The nearest rivals for the AMD chip include the Intel Core i9-12900T, AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i7-13700, and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, all with average scores within 0.2% of 37112. That places the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 in the company of much higher-tier desktop and mobile parts. The Core 3 201E, by contrast, competes with the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, Intel Core i5-12400F, Intel Core i5-1335U, and AMD EPYC 7773X, all within 0.4% of its score. The Intel chip is not a weak processor, but it is clearly positioned in a lower performance class.

For users who prioritize multi-core rendering, data compression, encryption, or any compute-intensive task, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the obvious choice from the recorded benchmarks. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, delivers class-leading results in its segment. The Core 3 201E, with 4 cores and 8 threads, is better suited to workloads that do not scale with core count, though even in single-thread tests it trails by 12.9% to 22.9% depending on the benchmark. The Intel part does offer a higher base clock of 3.60 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, but the AMD chip’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz and architectural efficiency overcome that advantage in practice.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The core configuration includes 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory.

The Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, part of the Core 3 generation. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size of 163 mm². The core configuration is 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Cache amounts include 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported. The Intel chip uses an Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 includes a Radeon 860M, while the Core 3 201E has UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, designed for laptops and compact systems. The Intel chip is a desktop processor with a 60 W TDP. The Intel part does offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes on the CPU. The AMD processor has a later release date, recorded as 2026-01-04, while the Intel chip was released on 2025-01-12.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has an average benchmark score of 37093, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 201E averages 19056, which is in the 73rd percentile.

Q: How much faster is the AMD chip in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 16054 against 12613 for the Intel Core 3 201E, a 27.3% advantage. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the margin is 93.3%, with scores of 2457 and 1271.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201E win any benchmark?

A: No. Out of 15 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins all of them. The smallest margin is 12.9% in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the CPU. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes on the CPU.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Core 3 201E has 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins in every benchmark category recorded. It is particularly strong in integer math, where it nearly doubles the Intel part’s score, and in multi-core workloads such as Cinebench R15, where the 93.3% delta indicates a massive throughput advantage. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24779 versus 14839 confirms that the AMD processor handles parallel tasks with far greater efficiency. Data compression, encryption, and extended instructions all favor AMD by margins of 67% or more. For users running rendering, scientific computing, or data processing, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the superior choice based on the recorded data.

The Intel Core 3 201E does not lead in any benchmark, but it does have platform attributes that may suit certain systems. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides a more modern I/O interface, and its higher base clock of 3.60 GHz could be relevant for lightly threaded tasks that do not boost. The desktop form factor and 60 W TDP indicate a design for always-connected systems with less concern for power efficiency. The Intel part also supports DDR4 memory, which may be an advantage in systems where DDR5 is not available. However, in terms of measured performance, the Core 3 201E trails in every test, with single-thread deficits between 12.9% and 22.9% and multi-thread deficits that reach as high as 93.3%.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201E uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.10 GHz. The Intel base clock is 3.60 GHz, and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz. The TDP for the AMD part is 28 W, while the Intel part is rated at 60 W. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

The process nodes differ significantly: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm at its own foundry. The die size is 195 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel. The cache configuration shows 80 KB of L1 per core for both, but the L2 is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. Both support ECC memory.

The PCIe interface differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 and 16 lanes on the CPU, while Intel offers Gen 5 and 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 860M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The market segments differ as well: AMD is a mobile processor, and Intel is a desktop processor. The release dates are recorded as 2026-01-04 for AMD and 2025-01-12 for Intel. The Intel Core 3 201E has a launch MSRP of $134. The part numbers are 100-000001865 for AMD and SRVTR for Intel. Both processors are active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.