AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core 3 100HL Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and the Intel Core 3 100HL are two processors aimed at different segments of the market, with the former being a mobile part and the latter a desktop-oriented chip. Despite both having 8 cores, the architectures and supporting hardware diverge significantly, which is reflected in their benchmark scores. The database records 14 benchmark wins for the AMD processor and a single win for the Intel chip. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 achieves an average benchmark score of 37093, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 100HL, by comparison, has an average score of 23545 and sits in the 76th percentile. This substantial gap in overall scoring sets the stage for a detailed comparison of where each processor excels and where it falls behind.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victories for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 come in multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the AMD part scores 2457 against the Intel’s 1506, a delta of 63.1%. This is the largest percentage difference in the entire head-to-head set. The Cinebench R23 multicore result shows a smaller, but still clear, margin of 7.4%, with scores of 16054 and 14948 respectively. The PassMark multithread test further confirms the trend, with AMD leading 24779 to 17586, a 40.9% advantage.

The AMD processor also demonstrates strong performance in integer and floating-point math. The PassMark integer math score for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 86227, which is 53.1% higher than the Intel Core 3 100HL’s 56308. Floating-point math shows a 25.8% lead, with scores of 52971 and 42108. These results indicate that the Zen 5 architecture in the AMD chip handles arithmetic operations more efficiently than the Raptor Lake design in the Intel part.

Data compression and encryption workloads also favor the AMD processor. The PassMark data compression score is 294298 for AMD versus 202225 for Intel, a 45.5% difference. Data encryption shows a 24.7% edge, with scores of 14925 and 11964. The extended instructions test, which often reflects SIMD and vector processing capabilities, shows a 66.7% advantage for AMD, scoring 20778 against 12463.

The AMD chip also wins the PassMark physics test by 44.1%, scoring 1337 versus 928. Random string sorting, a test that measures memory and cache efficiency under random access patterns, goes to AMD by 39.3%, with scores of 32344 and 23223. Prime number finding, a purely computational task, shows a 75% advantage for AMD, scoring 84 versus 48.

In single-threaded performance, the results are closer. The PassMark single-thread test shows AMD leading 3955 to 3735, a 5.9% margin. Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 3.8% lead for AMD, with scores of 220 and 212. However, the Intel Core 3 100HL takes its only win in Cinebench R23 single-core, scoring 2110 against AMD’s 2010, a 4.7% advantage. This single victory indicates that the Intel chip can hold its own in lightly threaded workloads that rely on peak single-core turbo performance.

Where Each One Wins

The data presents a clear picture of workload distribution. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins in all multi-threaded scenarios, all math-related tests, all data processing tests, and the majority of single-threaded tests. Its 16 threads, compared to Intel’s 12, likely contribute to the substantial leads in Cinebench R15 multicore and PassMark multithread. The 63.1% delta in Cinebench R15 is particularly notable, as it suggests a major throughput advantage in older rendering workloads that scale well with thread count.

For content creation and rendering tasks, the AMD processor is the stronger choice. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16054 indicates solid performance in modern rendering workloads, while the Intel’s 14948 is competitive but lower. The AMD chip’s lead in data compression, 294298 versus 202225, makes it well suited for archiving, file management, and database operations. Encryption performance, 14925 versus 11964, points to advantages in secure data handling and VPN workloads.

The Intel Core 3 100HL does have a niche. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2110 is the only benchmark where it beats the AMD part. This suggests that in applications that are strictly single-threaded and rely on a single core’s peak clock speed, the Intel chip can deliver slightly better frame times or responsiveness. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz on the Intel part, compared to the AMD’s 5.10 GHz, does not tell the whole story, as the recorded scores show the Intel chip winning this specific test.

In everyday productivity tasks that are not heavily threaded, the difference is small. The PassMark single-thread scores differ by only 5.9%, and Cinebench R15 single-core differs by 3.8%. Users running office applications, web browsing, or light coding would likely see similar performance from both processors. The AMD chip’s wins in encryption and compression, however, give it an edge in tasks that involve significant data movement.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the superior processor for the vast majority of workloads. It wins 14 of the 15 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, and its average benchmark score of 37093 places it in the 85th percentile, far above the Intel Core 3 100HL’s 76th percentile and average score of 23545. The AMD chip’s nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-12900T, AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i7-13700, and AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, all of which have average scores within 0.2% of the AMD part. This places the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 in the company of much higher-tier desktop processors.

The Intel Core 3 100HL, with an average score of 23545, is closest to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U, Intel Core i5-11500, Intel Core Ultra 7 266V, and AMD Ryzen 7 5800H. The deltas to these rivals are small, ranging from -0.7% to 1.2%, which suggests the Intel chip is competitive with mid-range mobile and older desktop processors. However, it does not reach the performance tier of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450.

For users who prioritize multi-threaded performance, rendering, data processing, or encryption, the AMD processor is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. The 63.1% lead in Cinebench R15 multicore and the 53.1% lead in integer math are decisive. For users who need the absolute best single-core performance in a specific benchmark, the Intel chip’s Cinebench R23 single-core win is relevant, but it is a narrow advantage of 4.7% and does not translate to wins in other single-threaded tests.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is also a mobile processor with a 28W TDP, while the Intel Core 3 100HL is a desktop chip with a 45W TDP. The fact that the AMD part achieves higher performance while consuming less power, as indicated by the TDP figures, makes its benchmark dominance more impressive. The data supports selecting the AMD processor for almost any use case, with the Intel chip only being preferable in scenarios that specifically benefit from its single Cinebench R23 win.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has an average benchmark score of 37093, while the Intel Core 3 100HL has an average score of 23545.

Q: How many benchmarks does each processor win in the head-to-head comparison?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins 14 benchmarks, and the Intel Core 3 100HL wins 1 benchmark.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core 3 100HL beat the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450?

A: The Intel Core 3 100HL wins the Cinebench R23 single-core test, scoring 2110 versus AMD’s 2010, a 4.7% advantage.

Q: What is the largest performance delta between the two processors?

A: The largest delta is in the Cinebench R15 multicore test, where the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 2457 against Intel’s 1506, a 63.1% difference.

Q: How do the two processors compare in the PassMark single-thread test?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 3955, and the Intel Core 3 100HL scores 3735, giving AMD a 5.9% lead.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and the Intel Core 3 100HL is in the 76th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, while the Intel Core 3 100HL uses Raptor Lake with the codename Raptor Lake-PS. The AMD chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, whereas the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. This process advantage likely contributes to the AMD chip’s higher performance and lower TDP.

The core and thread configurations differ despite both having 8 cores. The AMD processor has 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 12 threads. This difference in thread count is a major factor in the multi-threaded benchmark results, as the AMD chip can process more concurrent tasks. The AMD processor’s generation is listed as Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), indicating a hybrid core design, while the Intel chip is listed as Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS).

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel chip has 2 MB of L2 cache per core. For L3 cache, the AMD processor has 8 MB, while the Intel processor has 12 MB shared. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the Intel chip do not translate to benchmark wins in the recorded data, with the AMD chip outperforming it in memory-sensitive tests like random string sorting.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses a Radeon 860M, while the Intel Core 3 100HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. The database does not record graphics benchmark scores for either processor, so a direct comparison of GPU performance is not possible from the data. Memory support also diverges, with the AMD chip supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor has an 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth figure recorded, while the Intel chip has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

The AMD processor supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not. The PCIe configurations differ, with the AMD chip offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel chip offering Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor has a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel chip has no die size recorded. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000001865, while the Intel part number is listed as unknown.

Specification Differences

The specifications where the two processors differ are numerous. The base clock of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 2.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 100HL has a base clock of 2.10 GHz. The boost clock is higher on the AMD chip at 5.10 GHz, compared to Intel’s 4.60 GHz. The TDP is another significant difference, with AMD at 28W and Intel at 45W.

The socket types are entirely different. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The market segments also differ, with the AMD chip classified as Mobile and the Intel chip as Desktop. The release dates are different, with the AMD processor released on 2026-01-04 and the Intel processor released on 2024-04-07. Both processors are marked as Active in production status.

The process node and foundry are different, as previously noted, with AMD using a 4 nm TSMC process and Intel using a 10 nm Intel process. The memory support differs, with AMD supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and Intel supporting DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has ECC memory support, while the Intel chip does not. The L2 and L3 cache configurations differ, with AMD having 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB L3, and Intel having 2 MB L2 per core and 12 MB L3.

The PCIe lanes differ, with AMD offering 16 lanes and Intel offering 8 lanes, both Gen 4. The integrated graphics differ, with AMD using Radeon 860M and Intel using Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. The memory bandwidth is recorded for AMD at 89.6 GB/s, while no value is recorded for Intel. The multiplier is locked on both processors. The part numbers differ, with AMD having 100-000001865 and Intel having unknown. The die size is 195 mm² for AMD, with no value for Intel.