AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G
Core 7 150U
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 7 150U
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and Intel Core 7 150U occupy different corners of the processor market, with the former aimed at desktop systems and the latter designed for mobile platforms. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap, with the AMD part winning all 11 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The Ryzen AI 7 450G posts an average benchmark score of 63331, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 150U averages 17395, landing in the 71st percentile. This positions the AMD chip among high-end desktop processors, whereas the Intel part sits closer to mainstream mobile offerings.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The most striking result appears in extended instructions, where the Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 28223 against the Core 7 150U's 8748, a 222.6% advantage. This indicates a massive lead in workloads that leverage advanced CPU instruction sets, such as encryption, compression, and certain scientific calculations. The data compression test follows a similar pattern: the AMD processor records 402831 compared to Intel's 158622, a 154% delta. For users handling large datasets or archiving files, the Ryzen part delivers more than double the throughput.
Multi-threaded performance reinforces the AMD dominance. The passmark_multithread score for the Ryzen AI 7 450G is 30422, while the Core 7 150U manages 14700, yielding a 107% difference. The integer math test shows a 95.3% gap (99732 vs 51057), and floating point math favors AMD by 85.1% (63683 vs 34405). These results suggest the Ryzen processor sustains higher throughput across both integer and floating-point operations, making it the stronger choice for rendering, simulation, and content creation tasks that scale with core count and instruction efficiency.
Even in single-threaded performance, where Intel traditionally competes closely, the Ryzen AI 7 450G leads. The passmark_single_thread score is 4309 for AMD versus 3508 for Intel, a 22.8% margin. This is notable because the Core 7 150U has a higher boost clock (5.40 GHz versus 5.10 GHz), yet the AMD architecture still extracts more work per cycle. The physics test shows a 42.3% advantage for AMD (1440 vs 1012), and the prime number finding test, which stresses branch prediction and integer recursion, favors AMD by 50% (87 vs 58). Random string sorting, a memory-latency sensitive workload, goes to AMD with 42663 versus 18269, a 133.5% difference.
The Intel Core 7 150U does not win any of the 11 recorded head-to-head tests. Its closest relative performance comes in the single-thread tests, where the 22.8% deficit is the smallest gap. However, the overall pattern is clear: the Ryzen AI 7 450G outperforms the Core 7 150U by margins ranging from roughly 23% to over 220% depending on the workload. The nearest rivals to the Ryzen AI 7 450G, based on average score, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i7-13790F (0.4% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (0.7% behind). For the Core 7 150U, its closest competitors are the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 (0.4% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 3 210 (0.4% ahead), confirming that the Intel mobile chip competes in a far lower performance tier.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G wins across every measured category, but the magnitude of its advantage varies by workload type. The largest deltas appear in extended instructions (222.6%), data compression (154%), and random string sorting (133.5%). These are workloads that benefit from high memory bandwidth, large caches, and efficient data movement. The Ryzen part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which likely contributes to these results. The Core 7 150U also supports DDR5 and DDR4, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for it, making direct comparison impossible.
For integer and floating-point math, the Ryzen AI 7 450G leads by roughly 85% to 95%. These scores reflect raw arithmetic throughput, where the 8-core, 16-thread AMD processor with its Zen 5 architecture outperforms the 10-core, 12-thread Intel part. Despite having fewer cores, the AMD chip benefits from simultaneous multithreading, which doubles its thread count to 16, while the Intel part has 10 physical cores but only 12 threads, indicating a hybrid configuration with some cores lacking hyper-threading.
The single-thread advantage of 22.8% for AMD suggests better per-core efficiency, which matters for lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software. The physics score (42.3% lead) points to advantages in simulation workloads that rely on both integer and floating-point operations. The encryption test (88.9% lead) and prime number finding (50% lead) round out a comprehensive sweep. The Intel Core 7 150U, with no wins, serves best in scenarios where its lower 15 W TDP is prioritized over raw performance, such as fanless or ultra-thin laptops where thermal limits are strict.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different manufacturing nodes and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 150U uses Intel's 10 nm node. This node advantage gives AMD a density and efficiency edge, though the desktop part operates at a 65 W TDP compared to Intel's 15 W mobile part. The Ryzen processor is built on the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-U codename, targeting the Core 7 generation.
Cache configurations differ significantly. The Ryzen AI 7 450G has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 150U also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 is 1.25 MB per core, and it has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger Intel L3 cache may help in some workloads, but the benchmark data shows the AMD part still dominates in cache-sensitive tests like random string sorting. The AMD processor supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel chip, which matters for reliability in workstation or server-like environments.
Memory support shows another split: the Ryzen part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; no figure is recorded for Intel. PCIe connectivity also differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only) versus Intel's Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses the Radeon 860M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The Ryzen processor features an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, whereas the Intel part has a locked multiplier. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM5, while Intel uses the BGA 1744 socket, reflecting their desktop and mobile market segments respectively.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G records an average benchmark score of 63331, while the Intel Core 7 150U averages 17395. The AMD part sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 71st percentile for Intel.
Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4309 in the passmark single-thread test, which is 22.8% higher than the Intel Core 7 150U's 3508. This holds despite Intel's higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus AMD's 5.10 GHz.
Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150U win any head-to-head benchmark?
A: No. The recorded data shows the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G winning all 11 head-to-head tests, with deltas ranging from 22.8% in single-thread tests to 222.6% in extended instructions.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads. Despite fewer cores, the AMD processor delivers higher multithread performance, scoring 30422 versus 14700 in the passmark multithread test.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 150U does not support ECC memory.
Q: How do the manufacturing processes compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150U uses Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD part has a TDP of 65 W, while the Intel part has a TDP of 15 W.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.80 GHz for Intel; boost clocks are 5.10 GHz and 5.40 GHz respectively. The TDP is 65 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket AM5 for the Ryzen part and Intel BGA 1744 for the Core part. The process node is 4 nm (TSMC) for AMD and 10 nm (Intel) for Intel. Codenames are Gorgon Point for AMD and Raptor Lake-U for Intel, with generations listed as Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) and Core 7 (Raptor Lake-U).
Cache layouts differ: AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 8 MB L3, while Intel has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 12 MB shared L3. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. The AMD chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; Intel has none recorded. ECC memory is supported only on AMD. PCIe lanes are 12 for AMD and 8 for Intel, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics are Radeon 860M for AMD and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel. The market segment is Desktop for AMD and Mobile for Intel. The multiplier is unlocked on AMD and locked on Intel. Release dates are 2026-02-28 for AMD and 2024-01-07 for Intel. The AMD part has a die size of 195 mm², while Intel has no recorded die size. The AMD part number is 100-000001917, and the Intel part number is SRMYP.