AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 315

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 6 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.5 Base / 4.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Wildcat Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
402,831
146,143
passmark_data_encryption
18,937
11,119
passmark_extended_instructions
28,223
13,143
passmark_find_prime_numbers
87
112
passmark_floating_point_math
63,683
42,441
passmark_integer_math
99,732
31,690
passmark_multithread
30,422
15,272
passmark_physics
1,440
1,163
passmark_random_string_sorting
42,663
17,551
passmark_single_thread
4,309
4,021
passmark_singlethread
4,309
4,021
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,308
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
184
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
5,452
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
769
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
12,981
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
1,832

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 5 315

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive overall margin for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, which wins 10 of the 11 shared benchmark comparisons. The most striking result is in integer math, where the AMD part scores 99,732 against Intel’s 31,690, a 214.7% advantage. This is the largest single-test gap in the dataset and reflects a fundamental difference in parallel throughput capability.

Data compression follows a similar pattern. The Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 402,831 versus 146,143 for the Core 5 315, a 175.6% lead. Random string sorting shows a 143.1% gap, with 42,663 versus 17,551. Extended instruction workloads favor AMD by 114.7%, at 28,223 versus 13,143. These four tests all involve heavy multi-threaded workloads, and the pattern is consistent: the AMD processor delivers more than double the throughput in several cases.

Multithreaded performance overall lands at 30,422 for the Ryzen AI 7 450G, nearly double the Intel part’s 15,272, a 99.2% difference. Floating point math shows a 50.1% lead, 63,683 versus 42,441. Data encryption is closer but still firmly in AMD’s favor, 18,937 versus 11,119, a 70.3% margin. Physics simulation scores 1,440 versus 1,163, a 23.8% advantage for AMD.

The single-thread comparison is much tighter. The Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4,309, while the Core 5 315 scores 4,021, a 7.2% difference. This indicates that while AMD holds the lead in single-core performance, it is not overwhelming. The Intel part’s single-thread score is competitive, which matters for lightly threaded applications.

The Intel Core 5 315 does claim one win. In the find prime numbers test, it scores 112 against AMD’s 87, a 22.3% margin in Intel’s favor. This is an isolated result, but it is a genuine victory and suggests that the Intel architecture handles this specific workload more efficiently. Across all other shared tests, AMD’s lead ranges from modest to massive.

The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is 63,331, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all recorded CPUs. The Intel Core 5 315 averages 18,188, at the 72nd percentile. This places the two processors in entirely different performance tiers, with AMD’s average score being roughly 3.5 times higher. The nearest rivals for the AMD part include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, which scores 63,173 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 at 63,765 (0.7% higher). The Intel Core 5 315 sits alongside the AMD EPYC 9274F at 18,189 and the Intel Core i7-9700 at 18,180, effectively matching both within 0.1%.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the stronger compute processor in nearly every measurable way. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide substantial multi-threaded headroom, and the 99.2% lead in the multithread PassMark test confirms that. The 214.7% advantage in integer math and 175.6% lead in data compression are not marginal gains; they represent a different class of throughput. Anyone running CPU-bound parallel workloads, content creation tasks, or heavy data processing should favor the AMD part based solely on these numbers.

The Intel Core 5 315 has a narrower role. Its single-thread score of 4,021 is within 7.2% of the AMD part, and its win in the prime number test shows that it can outperform in specific algorithmic patterns. The Intel processor also carries a 15 W TDP versus AMD’s 65 W, which makes it the more power-efficient choice for constrained thermal environments. The data does not show the Intel part as competitive in raw performance, but it does indicate a viable option for systems where power draw is the primary constraint.

For buyers prioritizing raw benchmark performance, the Ryzen AI 7 450G wins decisively. For buyers prioritizing low power consumption in a mobile form factor, the Core 5 315 is the logical pick. Neither processor is a substitute for the other based on the recorded scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different process nodes. AMD uses TSMC’s 4 nm process for the Ryzen AI 7 450G, while Intel uses its own 3 nm process for the Core 5 315. The AMD part is built on the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel’s part uses the Wildcat Lake codename, from the Core 5 generation. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel offers 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no simultaneous multi-threading on the Intel side.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD processor provides 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of L3. The Intel part lists 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The per-core L2 allocation on AMD is larger, which contributes to its multi-threaded performance advantage.

Memory architecture also diverges. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but AMD uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while Intel uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s. This 33% bandwidth difference likely plays a role in the large gaps seen in memory-sensitive benchmarks like data compression and integer math. AMD also supports ECC memory, which Intel does not.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD part offers Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are also different: AMD uses the Radeon 860M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD processor is unlocked for overclocking, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD socket is AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel socket is BGA 1516, reflecting the desktop versus mobile market positioning.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 5 315 has 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyper-threading support.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4,309 in the PassMark single-thread test, versus 4,021 for the Intel Core 5 315. That is a 7.2% advantage for AMD.

Q: Which processor is more power-efficient based on the data?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 has a 15 W TDP, compared to 65 W for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G. The Intel part also targets the mobile segment, while AMD targets desktop.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any benchmark?

A: Yes. The Intel Core 5 315 wins the find prime numbers test, scoring 112 versus 87 for AMD, a 22.3% margin.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 315 uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G averages 63,331, placing at the 93rd percentile. The Intel Core 5 315 averages 18,188, at the 72nd percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G wins in every category that demands parallel execution. Data compression and decompression workloads show a 175.6% lead, making it the clear choice for archive handling, backup software, and database operations. Integer math performance, with a 214.7% advantage, points to strong performance in general computation, financial modeling, and scientific simulation. The 99.2% multithread score gap indicates that rendering, video encoding, and compiler workloads will complete significantly faster on the AMD part. The 50.1% floating point advantage further supports use cases like 3D rendering and physics calculations. The 70.3% encryption lead makes the AMD processor preferable for file encryption, VPN traffic handling, and secure data processing.

The Intel Core 5 315 wins in a narrower set of conditions. Its prime number test victory suggests efficiency in specific integer algorithms, particularly those that rely on small data sets and low latency rather than raw throughput. Its 15 W TDP makes it the better fit for passively cooled systems, thin-and-light laptops, and battery-powered devices where sustained performance is secondary to power draw. The single-channel memory bus and 6 PCIe lanes indicate a simpler platform design, which can be an advantage in compact motherboards where space and thermal limits are tight. The Intel part also offers a mobile form factor with BGA 1516, making it suitable for soldered, low-profile builds.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G runs at a 2.00 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Intel Core 5 315 runs at 1.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. The AMD part has a 65 W TDP, while Intel lists 15 W. AMD uses Socket AM5, Intel uses BGA 1516. The AMD processor is built on TSMC’s 4 nm node, Intel on its own 3 nm node. AMD’s cache totals 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3. Intel has 192 KB L1 total, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3. AMD supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth; Intel uses single-channel with 59.7 GB/s. AMD supports ECC memory, Intel does not. AMD offers 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, Intel offers 6. AMD’s integrated GPU is the Radeon 860M, Intel’s is Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. AMD is unlocked for overclocking, Intel is locked. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $340.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 450G
5 315
Core Specs
Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Threads
16
6 -62.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.5 -25.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.4 -13.7%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.5 -25.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.4 -13.7%
Multiplier
20
15 -25.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB
L3 Cache
8 MB
6 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
15 -76.9%
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Codename
Gorgon Point
Wildcat Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Single-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
59.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR5 Speed
—
6400 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel BGA 1516
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
—
PCIe
Gen 4, 12 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 6 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
1400 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Yes / 15 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$340
Part Number
100-000001917
SAEFC
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-BGA
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 7 450G Details View Core 5 315 Details