AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 223PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
402,831
346,623
passmark_data_encryption
18,937
18,448
passmark_extended_instructions
28,223
24,672
passmark_find_prime_numbers
87
159
passmark_floating_point_math
63,683
76,468
passmark_integer_math
99,732
99,819
passmark_multithread
30,422
31,124
passmark_physics
1,440
2,493
passmark_random_string_sorting
42,663
35,798
passmark_single_thread
4,309
4,219
passmark_singlethread
4,309
4,219
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,666
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
376
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
11,111
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,568
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
26,455
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,734

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 5 223PE

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and Intel Core 5 223PE both present 8-core, 16-thread configurations for desktop use, but the recorded benchmark data separates them into distinct performance profiles. The AMD part secures 6 head-to-head wins, focusing on data integrity, compression, and single-thread tasks, while the Intel part takes 5 wins, dominating in physics simulation and prime number computation. The overall average benchmark scores diverge significantly, with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G recording an average of 63331 against the Intel Core 5 223PE's 40585, a gap that places the AMD chip in the 93rd percentile versus the Intel chip's 87th percentile among all CPUs.

Where Each One Wins

The use-case split is clear from the benchmark results. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G delivers its strongest advantages in tasks that stress memory bandwidth and data manipulation. In data compression, it scores 402831, a 16.2% lead over the Intel part's 346623. Random string sorting shows an even larger margin, with the AMD chip at 42663 versus 35798, a 19.2% advantage. These two workloads benefit from the AMD part's memory subsystem and cache architecture. The extended instructions test also favors AMD, with a score of 28223 against 24672, a 14.4% lead, indicating better throughput on specialized instruction sets.

The Intel Core 5 223PE, on the other hand, wins decisively in physics and prime number workloads. The physics test shows a massive 42.2% advantage for Intel, scoring 2493 versus AMD's 1440. Find prime numbers reveals an even larger relative gap, with Intel scoring 159 against AMD's 87, a 45.3% lead. These tests often rely on integer throughput and branch prediction, where the Intel architecture shows clear superiority. Floating point math also goes to Intel, with a score of 76468 versus 63683, a 16.7% advantage. The overall multithread score slightly favors Intel at 31124 versus 30422, a 2.3% lead, while integer math is essentially tied at 99819 for Intel versus 99732 for AMD, a 0.1% difference.

Single-thread performance goes to AMD, with a score of 4309 versus Intel's 4219, a 2.1% lead. Data encryption also tips toward AMD, 18937 versus 18448, a 2.7% margin. For workloads involving compression, sorting, encryption, and single-thread responsiveness, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the stronger choice. For physics simulation, prime number searches, and floating point heavy calculations, the Intel Core 5 223PE delivers better results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC and uses the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 223PE uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with the Bartlett Lake codename and Core 5 generation branding. The die size for AMD is recorded at 195 mm², while no die size is listed for Intel.

Cache layouts differ notably. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core for AMD versus 2 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is where the bigger disparity appears: AMD has 8 MB of L3, while Intel has 24 MB shared. This larger L3 on the Intel part likely contributes to its strong performance in physics and floating point tests, where larger working sets can stay resident on-chip.

Memory support shows a split: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both run dual-channel memory with identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 860M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD chip uses the AM5 socket, Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of $232, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the Intel part.

The Verdict

The data points to distinct purchasing decisions based on workload priorities. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G offers a higher overall average benchmark score of 63331, placing it in the 93rd percentile, which is 6 points higher than the Intel part's 87th percentile. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX with an average score of 63173 (0.2% delta), the Intel Core i7-13790F at 63080 (0.4% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 at 63765 (-0.7% delta). This places the AMD chip in a performance tier that competes with higher-end desktop and mobile parts.

The Intel Core 5 223PE, with an average score of 40585, sits in a different tier. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core 7 253PE at 40557 (0.1% delta), the Intel Xeon 6357P at 40630 (-0.1% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H at 40518 (0.2% delta). The average score gap between the two reviewed parts is substantial, around 36%, but the Intel chip still holds specific workload advantages.

For users prioritizing compression workloads, encryption, random string sorting, or single-thread performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the clear choice from the data. It also wins on overall average score and percentile ranking. For users running physics simulations, prime number computations, or floating point heavy applications, the Intel Core 5 223PE delivers superior results. The multithread score slightly favors Intel, suggesting that general multi-threaded workloads without specific data-handling patterns may see a small benefit from the Intel part. The AMD part's higher average score and better single-thread performance make it the more balanced option, while the Intel part is specialized for certain computational tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4309 in the single-thread test, which is 2.1% higher than the Intel Core 5 223PE's score of 4219.

Q: How do the two processors compare in data compression?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 402831 in data compression, a 16.2% advantage over the Intel Core 5 223PE's 346623.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the find prime numbers test, where the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 159 against the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G's 87, a 45.3% difference in favor of Intel.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and the Intel Core 5 223PE support ECC memory.

Q: What are the overall average benchmark scores for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has an average benchmark score of 63331, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has an average score of 40585.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive AMD wins come in memory-heavy and data-processing tasks. Random string sorting shows the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G at 42663 versus the Intel Core 5 223PE at 35798, a 19.2% lead. Data compression follows with AMD at 402831 versus 346623, a 16.2% advantage. Extended instructions show AMD at 28223 versus 24672, a 14.4% lead. These three tests indicate that the AMD part handles data movement and instruction set extensions more effectively.

The encryption test is closer, with AMD at 18937 versus Intel at 18448, a 2.7% margin. Single-thread performance also goes to AMD by a narrow margin, 4309 versus 4219, a 2.1% lead. This suggests that for latency-sensitive single-threaded applications, the AMD chip holds a slight edge.

The Intel wins are concentrated in compute-heavy workloads. The physics test shows Intel at 2493 versus AMD at 1440, a 42.2% advantage. The find prime numbers test is even more lopsided, with Intel at 159 versus AMD at 87, a 45.3% lead. Floating point math also favors Intel significantly, 76468 versus 63683, a 16.7% margin. The multithread score goes to Intel at 31124 versus 30422, a 2.3% lead, and integer math is essentially a tie at 99819 versus 99732, a 0.1% difference.

The overall win count stands at 6 for AMD and 5 for Intel. The AMD wins tend to be in throughput-oriented tasks with larger performance gaps, while the Intel wins include the two largest individual margins of the comparison. The average benchmark score favors AMD heavily, but the Intel part demonstrates that it has specific computational strengths that the AMD chip cannot match.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 450G
5 223PE
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.9 +45.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.2 +2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.9 +45.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.2 +2.0%
Multiplier
20
29 +45.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
65 0.0%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 12 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$232
Part Number
100-000001917
SA4QF
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 7 450G Details View Core 5 223PE Details