AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 5 130UL Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G
Core 5 130UL
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 5 130UL
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data splits these two desktop processors into clearly different performance classes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G holds an average benchmark score of 63331, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 5 130UL, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark entries, an average score of zero, and sits at the 50th percentile. On raw performance, the AMD part is the decisive winner across every measurable workload category present in the database.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G dominates in multithreaded throughput. Its PassMark multithread score of 30422 reflects the advantage of 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 5 130UL offers 10 cores but only 12 threads, and with no benchmark data recorded, the database shows no comparable workload results for the Intel part. The AMD chip also leads in single-thread performance with a score of 4309, a figure that indicates strong per-core efficiency from its Zen 5 architecture. The Intel part has no single-thread score recorded, so no direct comparison is possible in the database.
The AMD processor wins in every specialized compute category listed. For integer math, it scores 99732. For floating point math, it scores 63683. Extended instruction workloads produce a score of 28223. Data compression scores 402831. Data encryption scores 18937. Random string sorting scores 42663. Physics simulation scores 1440. Prime number finding scores 87. Each of these represents a workload category where the AMD part has verifiable recorded results and the Intel part has none.
The Intel Core 5 130UL does win in one structural category: core count. It has 10 cores versus the AMD part's 8 cores. However, the Intel chip has fewer threads (12 versus 16), indicating a hybrid core arrangement where only some cores support simultaneous multithreading. In the database, the Intel part's only recorded advantages are its lower 15 W TDP, its support for DDR4 memory, its larger 12 MB shared L3 cache, and its Intel Socket 1700 compatibility. For users prioritizing pure compute throughput, the AMD part is the only one with recorded evidence of capability.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 130UL uses a 10 nm node from Intel's own fabs. The AMD part belongs to the Gorgon Point codename family within the Ryzen AI 400 generation, built on a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part belongs to the Raptor Lake-PS codename family, using the Raptor Lake architecture. The AMD chip's die size is 195 mm²; the Intel chip's die size is not recorded in the database.
Cache layouts differ substantially. Both parts list 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 allocation differs: the AMD chip has 1 MB per core, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major differentiator. AMD provides 8 MB of L3 cache, while Intel provides 12 MB shared across the chip. This larger shared pool may help the Intel part in certain cache-sensitive workloads, though no benchmark data exists to confirm such an effect.
Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. AMD also enables ECC memory support, while the Intel part does not. This makes the AMD chip more suitable for error-sensitive compute environments.
PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD chip thus offers more direct CPU-attached lanes for expansion devices. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 860M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. Neither GPU has recorded benchmark scores in the database, so performance claims cannot be made.
The Intel part has a lower TDP of 15 W compared to the AMD part's 65 W. This indicates a much lower power envelope, likely targeting compact or power-constrained desktop systems. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, while the Intel part's multiplier is locked. The AMD chip was released later: its release date is recorded as 2026-02-28, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-04-07. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and the Intel Core 5 130UL. The head-to-head array is empty, and the win counts for both parts are zero. This absence of paired testing means all comparisons must rely on the AMD part's standalone benchmark scores and the Intel part's lack of any recorded scores.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. Its average benchmark score of 63331 sits within 0.8% of several comparable processors. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63173, placing it 0.2% below the AMD part. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63080, also 0.4% below. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 63765, which is 0.7% above the 450G. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62839, 0.8% below. These margins are all within one percentage point, indicating that the 450G performs at the same tier as these established desktop and mobile processors. The Intel Core 5 130UL does not appear in any rival list, reinforcing its position outside this performance class.
The AMD part's percentile ranking of 93 against all CPUs in the database places it among high-performing processors. The Intel part's percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all recorded CPUs. The gap in average benchmark scores (63331 versus 0) reflects the complete absence of recorded benchmark results for the Intel part, not necessarily a hardware failure. The database simply contains no measured data for the Intel Core 5 130UL.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core 5 130UL has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores. However, the AMD part has more threads: 16 versus the Intel part's 12.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has an average benchmark score of 63331. The Intel Core 5 130UL has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries in the database.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 130UL does not.
Q: What are the TDP values for these CPUs?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has a TDP of 65 W. The Intel Core 5 130UL has a TDP of 15 W, indicating a substantially lower power envelope.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core 5 130UL has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.
Q: How does the AMD processor compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is within 0.8% of all four nearest rivals listed in the database. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13790F, 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 130UL uses 10 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 1.60 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks differ: 5.10 GHz for AMD versus 4.70 GHz for Intel. TDP differs significantly: 65 W for AMD versus 15 W for Intel. Sockets differ: AMD Socket AM5 versus Intel Socket 1700.
Process technology differs: AMD uses a 4 nm node from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm node from its own foundry. Die size is recorded for AMD at 195 mm², with no die size recorded for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s for AMD, with no bandwidth recorded for Intel. ECC memory is supported by AMD but not by Intel. PCIe lanes differ: 12 lanes for AMD versus 8 lanes for Intel, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 860M for AMD versus Iris Xe Graphics 80EU for Intel. The multiplier is unlocked for AMD and locked for Intel. Release dates differ: 2026-02-28 for AMD versus 2024-04-07 for Intel. The part number is recorded for AMD (100-000001917) but unknown for Intel. The AMD part's generation is Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), while the Intel part's generation is Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS). The codenames differ: Gorgon Point for AMD, Raptor Lake-PS for Intel.
The Verdict
The data directs a clear conclusion. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results, and those results place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 63331 matches the performance tier of processors like the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, both of which sit within one percentage point. The Intel Core 5 130UL has no recorded benchmark data, leaving its performance unverified in the database.
For workloads that depend on multithreaded throughput, integer and floating point math, encryption, compression, or single-thread speed, the AMD part delivers measured evidence of capability. Its 16 threads, 5.10 GHz boost clock, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support a high-performance desktop profile. The Intel part's 15 W TDP and support for DDR4 memory suggest a low-power or legacy-compatible design, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm any performance advantage.
The only areas where the Intel Core 5 130UL holds a recorded edge are core count (10 versus 8), L3 cache size (12 MB versus 8 MB), and power draw (15 W versus 65 W). These are structural specifications, not measured performance outcomes. Users prioritizing raw compute results should select the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G. Users constrained by power limits or requiring DDR4 memory compatibility may consider the Intel Core 5 130UL, but they should be aware that the database contains no performance measurements to validate that choice.