AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and the Intel Core 3 304 occupy different ends of the performance spectrum, and the benchmark data confirms a decisive advantage for the AMD part. Across all eleven recorded head-to-head tests, the Ryzen AI 7 450G wins every single one, with margins ranging from 19.2% to a massive 304.8%. The Intel Core 3 304, while a capable mobile processor in its own right, is outclassed in raw compute, multithreaded workloads, and even single-threaded performance. The database shows the AMD chip sitting at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel chip lands at the 68th percentile, a gap that mirrors the average benchmark score difference of 63,331 versus 13,745.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single victory for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 99,732 against the Intel Core 3 304's 24,640. That is a 304.8% delta, meaning the AMD processor delivers more than four times the integer throughput. This is not a marginal edge; it is a fundamental difference in processing capability, driven by the AMD part's 8 cores and 16 threads versus the Intel part's 5 cores and 5 threads. The data shows that integer-heavy workloads, such as compilation or spreadsheet calculations, will be dramatically faster on the AMD chip.

Data compression tells a similar story. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G posts a score of 402,831, while the Intel Core 3 304 manages 114,775. The delta of 251% places the AMD part at roughly 3.5 times the compression throughput. Random string sorting, another memory-sensitive test, shows a 212.3% advantage for AMD, with scores of 42,663 against 13,659. These results indicate that the AMD chip's dual-channel memory bus, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, provides a substantial edge over the Intel chip's single-channel bus at 59.7 GB/s.

Extended instructions also favor AMD heavily. The Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 28,223, versus the Core 3 304's 9,686, a 191.4% delta. This test typically reflects SIMD and vectorized workload performance, and the AMD chip's Zen 5 architecture clearly handles these operations more efficiently. Floating-point math follows suit: AMD scores 63,683 against Intel's 29,722, a 114.3% advantage. The Intel Core 3 304 does not win a single floating-point test, and its best relative showing comes in the prime number search, where it trails by only 27.9% (87 versus 68).

The multithreaded PassMark score is a strong overall indicator of parallel performance. Here, AMD leads with 30,422 against Intel's 11,625, a 161.7% delta. Physics simulation, which often scales with core count, shows AMD at 1,440 versus Intel's 868, a 65.9% advantage. Even in data encryption, a test that can be sensitive to instruction set features, AMD leads by 122.8%, scoring 18,937 versus 8,501.

The closest contest is in single-threaded performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4,309, while the Intel Core 3 304 scores 3,614. That is a 19.2% delta, which is still a clear win for AMD, but the smaller margin suggests that the Intel chip's 4.30 GHz boost clock partially compensates for its lower core count and older architecture. However, the AMD part's 5.10 GHz boost clock and higher IPC from the Zen 5 design keep it ahead even in lightly threaded tasks.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G wins in every measurable category. There is no benchmark in the head-to-head table where the Intel Core 3 304 takes the lead. The AMD chip dominates CPU-intensive tasks, memory bandwidth-bound operations, and multithreaded workloads. Its 8 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel memory, and 16 threads make it suitable for content creation, software compilation, and any workload that scales across cores.

The Intel Core 3 304, however, has its own strengths that are not captured in the benchmark deltas but are visible in its specifications. Its 15 W TDP is dramatically lower than the AMD chip's 65 W TDP, which makes it more suitable for fanless or passively cooled mobile designs. The Intel part also uses a 3 nm process node from Intel's own foundry, which may offer power efficiency advantages in specific low-load scenarios. Additionally, the Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $309, a figure that can be stated once as per the database record.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, the wins are all computational. It is a desktop processor on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The Intel Core 3 304 is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 1516, with no unlocked multiplier. This means the AMD chip is designed for performance-first systems, while the Intel chip targets ultra-portable devices where battery life and thermals take priority over raw throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-threaded benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4,309 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 19.2% higher than the Intel Core 3 304's score of 3,614.

Q: How large is the multithreaded performance gap between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 30,422 in PassMark multithread, while the Intel Core 3 304 scores 11,625. This represents a 161.7% advantage for the AMD part.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 304 win any benchmark in the head-to-head comparison?

A: No. The database records 11 head-to-head benchmarks, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G wins all 11. The Intel Core 3 304 records zero wins.

Q: What is the difference in CPU core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads, meaning it does not support simultaneous multithreading.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s with a dual-channel bus. The Intel Core 3 304 has a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Intel chip support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core 3 304 does not support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G does support ECC memory.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.10 GHz for AMD and 4.30 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 65 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel, a fourfold difference that reflects their different market segments.

The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1516. This means the AMD part is socketed and replaceable, while the Intel part is soldered to the motherboard. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel chip is locked. The process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, and Intel uses 3 nm from its own foundry. The AMD chip has a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel chip's die size is not recorded in the database.

Memory support is similar in type (both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X), but the memory bus differs: AMD uses dual-channel, Intel uses single-channel. Caches differ as well: AMD has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. Intel has 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 860M, Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe).

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is built on the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which uses a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This architecture is designed for high performance per watt on a 4 nm TSMC process. The Intel Core 3 304 is based on the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 generation. It uses a 3 nm process from Intel's own fabs, which is more advanced in node size but does not translate into a performance advantage in the recorded benchmarks.

The AMD chip includes 8 MB of L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 per core, which is larger than the Intel chip's 6 MB of shared L3 and 2.5 MB of total L2. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel part. The Intel chip's integrated graphics, Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core, is a newer generation than the AMD Radeon 860M, but the database does not include graphics benchmarks, so no performance comparison can be made here.

The AMD chip's dual-channel memory architecture provides 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, versus Intel's 59.7 GB/s from single-channel memory. This affects any memory-bound workload, as shown in the compression and sorting benchmarks. The AMD chip also has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Intel chip does not. The production status for both is Active, and both are recent releases, with AMD dated 2026-02-28 and Intel dated 2026-04-15.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G outperforms the Intel Core 3 304 in every recorded test, with the smallest margin being 19.2% in single-threaded performance and the largest being 304.8% in integer math. The AMD chip's 93rd percentile ranking versus Intel's 68th percentile confirms that these are not competitors in the same class. The average benchmark score of 63,331 for AMD is more than four times the Intel chip's 13,745.

For workloads that demand CPU throughput, multithreading, or high memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the clear choice. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.10 GHz boost clock, and dual-channel memory make it suited for desktop systems where performance is the priority. For ultra-low-power mobile designs, the Intel Core 3 304 offers a 15 W TDP, a 3 nm process, and a newer integrated graphics architecture, but the recorded data shows no CPU benchmark where it leads. Users who prioritize raw compute should select the AMD chip; users who prioritize power efficiency and compact mobile form factors may consider the Intel chip, but they must accept a significant reduction in processing capability.