AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a substantial performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and the Intel Core 3 100UL. The Ryzen AI 7 450G has a complete set of benchmark results across 11 PassMark tests, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. This absence of data for the Intel part means a direct score-by-score comparison is not possible; instead, the analysis relies on the AMD processor's absolute scores and its positioning against other CPUs in the database.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G delivers an average benchmark score of 63,331. This places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs tracked, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX with an average score of 63,173, which is 0.2% behind the AMD part, and the Intel Core i7-13790F with a score of 63,080, which is 0.4% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 63,765, which is 0.7% ahead of the 450G, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62,839, sitting 0.8% behind. These tight margins around the 63,000 mark show that the Ryzen AI 7 450G is squarely in a competitive performance tier, trading places with high-end desktop and mobile chips.

In specific workloads, the Ryzen AI 7 450G shows notable strengths. Its PassMark data compression score is 402,831, a figure that indicates very high throughput in compression tasks. The integer math score reaches 99,732, while floating point math scores 63,683. Extended instruction scores are 28,223, and data encryption scores 18,937. The multithread score is 30,422, and the single-thread score is 4,309. The physics score is 1,440, and the find prime numbers score is 87. Random string sorting scores 42,663.

Since the Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmarks, the database shows no head-to-head wins for either processor. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero. This means the comparative analysis is one-sided: all available performance data belongs to the AMD part, and the Intel part's performance profile is entirely unmeasured in this database.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G wins every benchmark category where a score exists, simply because it is the only processor with scores. The Intel Core 3 100UL has zero recorded results, so it cannot be credited with a win in any test. The database does not contain any measurement for the Intel part across any of the PassMark tests, including single-thread, multithread, integer math, floating point math, or data encryption.

The Ryzen AI 7 450G's performance distribution suggests particular strengths in parallel workloads. Its multithread score of 30,422 and data compression score of 402,831 indicate strong multi-core throughput, consistent with its 8 cores and 16 threads. The single-thread score of 4,309 is also substantial, showing that the processor does not rely solely on core count; it delivers competitive per-core performance as well. The floating point math score of 63,683 and integer math score of 99,732 further reinforce that the processor handles both arithmetic types with similar efficiency.

For the Intel Core 3 100UL, the absence of benchmark data means no use-case advantages can be identified from the database. The processor has 6 cores and 8 threads, a lower base clock of 1.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz compared to the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost, but without test scores, any assertion about its real-world performance would be speculation. The database simply records no wins for this processor.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G have a higher average benchmark score than the Intel Core 3 100UL?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has an average benchmark score of 63,331. The Intel Core 3 100UL has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it in the database.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. This means it ranks higher than 93% of processors in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has an average score of 63,173, which is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G's score of 63,331. The difference is minimal, placing the two processors in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the single-thread score of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has a single-thread score of 4,309 in the PassMark single-thread test. This is recorded twice in the database under slightly different test names, with the same value of 4,309.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 100UL support ECC memory?

A: No. The database records that the Intel Core 3 100UL does not support ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the multithread score of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G?

A: The multithread score of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is 30,422 in the PassMark multithread test. This is one of the higher absolute scores among the recorded benchmarks for this processor.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, compared to the Intel part's base clock of 1.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) differs substantially: the AMD part is rated at 65 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 15 watts.

The socket types are different. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core 3 100UL uses Intel Socket 1700. The memory support differs as well: the AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a dual-channel memory bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel part also has a dual-channel memory bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

ECC memory support is another point of difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 3 100UL does not. The PCIe configurations differ: the AMD part has Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part has Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD processor uses Radeon 860M, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 64EU.

The multiplier is unlocked on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G, while it is locked on the Intel Core 3 100UL. The release dates are different: the AMD part was released on 2026-02-28, and the Intel part was released on 2024-04-07. The part numbers are different as well: the AMD part is 100-000001917, while the Intel part is listed as unknown.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between the two processors is significant. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses the codename Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 100UL uses the codename Raptor Lake-PS and belongs to the Core 3 generation based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The cache hierarchies differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 8 MB. The Intel Core 3 100UL also has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, but its L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 cache is 10 MB shared. The die size is recorded only for the AMD part at 195 mm²; the Intel part's die size is not recorded.

The AMD processor uses a hybrid architecture with both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, which typically combines high-performance cores with high-efficiency cores. The Intel processor is based on Raptor Lake, which uses a different core design. The AMD part's process node advantage (4 nm versus 10 nm) is notable from the database records, though no direct performance-per-watt measurements are provided. The Intel part's lower TDP of 15 watts compared to the AMD part's 65 watts suggests a different design target, oriented toward lower power consumption, but the database does not include efficiency benchmarks to quantify this.

The Verdict

The data in the database is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the only processor of the two with any recorded performance measurements. Its average benchmark score of 63,331 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmark results, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, which appears to be a default value rather than a measured position.

For users who rely on the database to compare processors, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G offers a complete performance profile across 11 different workloads, from data compression to physics simulations. The Intel Core 3 100UL offers no such profile, making it impossible to validate its performance against any competitor using the recorded data.

The AMD part also leads on specifications that typically correlate with performance: more cores (8 versus 6), more threads (16 versus 8), higher base and boost clocks, a larger L3 cache is not the case here (8 MB versus 10 MB for Intel), but the AMD part has a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm) and higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus unrecorded for Intel). The Intel part has a lower TDP (15 watts versus 65 watts) and supports DDR4 memory, which may appeal to systems with older memory infrastructure, but without benchmark scores, its actual performance cannot be assessed.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the processor with measurable, competitive performance in the database, while the Intel Core 3 100UL is a processor without any benchmark evidence. Buyers seeking a processor with documented performance should consider the AMD part; the Intel part's capabilities remain unverified in this database.