AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 5 225T represent two distinct interpretations of modern x86 processing, one designed for mobility and the other for desktop deployment. The data reveals a fascinating split: the AMD part dominates in integer-heavy and data-shuffling workloads, while the Intel chip asserts clear superiority in floating-point, physics, and single-threaded tasks. The overall win tally of 10 for Intel versus 5 for AMD, however, does not tell the complete story, as the magnitude of the victories differs sharply between the two contenders.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T boosts to 4.90 GHz. Despite the higher boost capability on the AMD side, the Intel part wins the single-threaded benchmark comparisons.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD processor uses simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count, whereas the Intel chip does not.

Q: Which processor leads in the PassMark integer math test?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 85,651 in the integer math test, which is 43.8% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T's score of 59,543. This is the largest percentage win for the AMD processor in any head-to-head benchmark.

Q: How do the two processors compare in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 21,971 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 27.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350's score of 16,014.5. This is the largest multi-core victory for the Intel processor.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 34,222, which places it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has an average score of 30,468, placing it at the 82nd percentile.

Q: Which processor has the higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T supports a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350's 89.6 GB/s. Both processors use dual-channel memory buses, but the Intel chip has a wider bandwidth path.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is the stronger all-round performer for desktop workloads. It wins 10 of the 15 recorded head-to-head benchmarks, including decisive victories in Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core, floating-point math, and physics simulations. Its 82nd percentile ranking against all CPUs, while lower than the AMD part's 84th percentile, reflects a different benchmark composition that favors its strengths.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, despite losing the overall tally, holds specific and significant advantages. It is the better choice for data compression, integer math, random string sorting, and extended instruction workloads, where its 16 threads provide a clear edge. The AMD processor is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, making it suitable for systems where power efficiency is paramount, while the Intel chip's 65 W TDP and desktop socket indicate a different intended use case.

For users prioritizing raw single-thread speed and floating-point performance, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is the clear selection based on benchmark results. For workloads that involve heavy data manipulation, sorting, and integer calculations, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 delivers superior results. The choice hinges entirely on the specific application profile rather than a universal best performer.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking difference emerges in the Cinebench R23 tests. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 21,971 in multi-core, a 27.1% lead over the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350's 16,014.5. The single-core margin is even larger, with the Intel chip scoring 3,101 against the AMD's 1,958, a 36.9% advantage. These results show a fundamental difference in single-thread execution capability that carries into many other tests.

The AMD processor fights back in the PassMark integer math test with a score of 85,651, beating the Intel's 59,543 by 43.8%. This is the largest single-benchmark delta in the entire comparison. In data compression, the AMD part scores 304,089 versus 233,998, a 30% win. The AMD chip also leads in random string sorting with 33,266 against 28,774, a 15.6% margin, and in extended instructions with 21,678 versus 20,083, a 7.9% advantage.

The Intel processor dominates the floating-point arena, scoring 82,751 in floating-point math compared to the AMD's 53,230, a 35.7% lead. In the physics test, Intel scores 2,053 against 1,349, a 34.3% margin. The find prime numbers test shows the largest percentage gap, with Intel at 284 versus AMD at 80, a 71.8% difference. Intel also wins data encryption with 18,289 versus 15,244, a 16.6% lead, and the Cinebench R15 multi-core test by a narrower 11.9% margin (2,477 versus 2,214). The single-thread PassMark test favors Intel at 4,348 versus 3,834, an 11.8% difference, and the multithread test is nearly even, with Intel's 25,358 just 1.7% ahead of AMD's 24,935.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ significantly: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads. Base clocks also differ, with the AMD at 2.00 GHz and the Intel at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with AMD at 5.00 GHz and Intel at 4.90 GHz.

Thermal design power presents a major divergence. The AMD part is rated at 28 W, while the Intel chip carries a 65 W TDP. The market segments are also opposite: the AMD processor is a mobile part, and the Intel is a desktop part. The sockets are incompatible, with AMD using Socket FP8 and Intel using Socket 1851.

Memory support differs, with the AMD chip supporting both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR5 only. Memory bandwidth favors Intel at 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The integrated graphics are distinct, with AMD using Radeon 860M and Intel using Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU. The Intel part has a larger die size at 243 mm² versus 195 mm² for AMD.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Krackan Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which incorporates both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation. The transistor count is listed at 17,800 million. The cache configuration is substantially different, with 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

The L3 cache difference is notable: Intel provides 20 MB shared, while AMD offers only 8 MB. The L2 cache per core also differs, with Intel at 3 MB versus AMD at 1 MB. The process node favors Intel at 3 nm versus AMD's 4 nm, though both are manufactured by TSMC. The Intel chip has a larger die at 243 mm² and a higher transistor count, while the AMD chip is smaller at 195 mm² with no transistor count listed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 wins in data compression, integer math, random string sorting, and extended instructions. The data compression score of 304,089 and the integer math score of 85,651 indicate that this processor is well-suited for database operations, file archiving, and general productivity tasks that involve heavy data movement. The 16 threads allow for efficient parallel processing of independent data streams, which explains the wins in sorting and compression workloads.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core, floating-point math, physics, prime number finding, data encryption, and single-thread tests. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,101 is particularly impressive, showing a high-frequency, high-IPC design that excels at latency-sensitive tasks. The floating-point math score of 82,751 and physics score of 2,053 point to strengths in scientific computing, 3D rendering, and simulation workloads that rely on heavy mathematical computation.

The multithread PassMark test is essentially a tie, with Intel ahead by only 1.7%. This near-parity in the overall multithread score, despite Intel's substantial wins in most other multi-threaded tests, highlights the AMD processor's efficiency in specific parallel workloads. The Intel part's 10 cores without hyperthreading still manages to outperform the 8-core, 16-thread AMD part in most aggregate tests, which suggests that the Intel architecture's per-core performance is substantially higher. The AMD processor remains the better choice for integer-heavy, data-centric workloads, while the Intel processor is the dominant force for floating-point and single-threaded applications.