AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the Intel Core 3 201TE. The AMD processor has a complete benchmark profile, while the Intel part has no recorded scores in any test suite. This makes a traditional side-by-side comparison of individual workloads impossible, but the available data still allows for meaningful analysis through the AMD chip's performance metrics and its position relative to other processors.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 records an average benchmark score of 34222, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4244P with an average score of 34220 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X at 34260 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-13450HX at 34333 with a delta of -0.3 percent, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H at 34083 with a delta of 0.4 percent. These deltas are remarkably tight, within a 0.7 percentage point spread, indicating the Ryzen AI 7 350 sits in a densely packed performance tier.

Looking at specific workload scores for the AMD processor, Cinebench R23 multicore yields 16014.5 points, while single-core reaches 1958 points. Geekbench results show 11676 multicore and 2164 single-core. PassMark tests reveal strengths in integer math with 85651 points, floating point math with 53230 points, and multithread performance at 24935 points. The data compression test records 304089 points, and extended instructions score 21678 points. Random string sorting produces 33266 points, while data encryption records 15244 points. Physics tests show 1349 points, and the find prime numbers test yields 80 points. The single-thread PassMark score is 3834 points.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has zero recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile ranking of 50th place among all CPUs is present in the database, but without measured workloads, its actual performance characteristics in these specific tests remain unknown. The absence of data does not indicate poor performance; it simply means the database has not yet captured results for this processor.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, the recorded data shows wins across every measured category because it is the only one of the two with benchmark results. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2477 and single-core score of 294 provide older-generation reference points. The R23 figures of 16014.5 multicore and 1958 single-core demonstrate strong scaling from the 8-core, 16-thread configuration.

The PassMark suite offers the most granular picture. Integer math at 85651 points suggests strong general-purpose computation, while floating point math at 53230 points indicates solid scientific and engineering workload capability. The multithread score of 24935 reflects good parallel efficiency. Data compression at 304089 points is particularly notable, nearly double the integer math score, showing excellent memory subsystem behavior for compression workloads. Extended instructions at 21678 points confirms robust SIMD processing.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has no wins recorded because no benchmark data exists for it. The processor's specifications suggest it targets a different segment entirely: 4 cores, 8 threads, a 2.90 GHz base clock, and a 4.60 GHz boost clock. The AMD part uses 8 cores and 16 threads with a 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The core count difference alone implies the AMD processor should dominate multithreaded workloads, while the Intel chip's higher base clock might favor lightly threaded tasks, but this remains speculative without benchmark confirmation.

The AMD processor's 84th percentile ranking versus the Intel part's 50th percentile ranking provides the only direct comparative signal. The 34 percentile point gap suggests the AMD processor sits substantially higher in overall CPU hierarchy, though this ranking is based on the Intel part's position without measured scores, so it likely reflects specification-based estimation rather than tested results.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 benchmark higher than the Intel Core 3 201TE?

A: The database contains no head-to-head scores between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has 17 recorded benchmark results, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has none. The AMD processor ranks in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the Intel part's 50th percentile.

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350's best performing workload?

A: The highest score in the AMD processor's benchmark profile is PassMark data compression at 304089 points. The next highest is integer math at 85651 points, followed by floating point math at 53230 points.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 34222 is essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 4244P at 34220. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X by 0.1 percent and the Intel Core i5-13450HX by 0.3 percent, while leading the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H by 0.4 percent.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Radeon 860M. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz, a difference of 0.40 GHz in favor of the AMD processor.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 2.90 GHz for the Intel chip. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz and 4.60 GHz respectively.

Thermal design power differs substantially: the AMD processor is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 45 watts. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes are 4 nm for AMD (fabricated by TSMC) and 10 nm for Intel (fabricated by Intel). Die sizes are 195 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel.

Cache configurations differ as well. Both share 80 KB of L1 cache per core. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 12 MB shared for Intel. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. The AMD processor does not support ECC memory, while the Intel processor does.

PCIe support differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Market segments are Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Release dates are January 5, 2025 for AMD and January 12, 2025 for Intel. The Intel processor has a recorded launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD processor has no launch MSRP listed. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Krackan Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename within the Core 3 generation. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry.

The AMD chip integrates the Radeon 860M graphics solution. The Intel chip integrates UHD Graphics 730. These represent different graphics architectures and performance classes, though neither has dedicated graphics benchmark data in the database.

Memory controller differences are evident. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip achieves 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC support exists only on the Intel part, which matters for certain workstation and server-adjacent scenarios. The AMD processor's dual-channel memory bus matches the Intel part's dual-channel layout.

PCIe generation is a notable architectural split. The Intel processor provides Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes, doubling the per-lane bandwidth of the AMD processor's Gen 4 implementation. This could benefit certain high-throughput peripheral scenarios, though the AMD part's mobile positioning may not require the same bandwidth envelope.

The core topology differs meaningfully. AMD's 8-core, 16-thread configuration with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores suggests a hybrid arrangement where some cores prioritize performance and others prioritize efficiency. Intel's 4-core, 8-thread Bartlett Lake design uses a more conventional homogeneous layout, with the higher base clock of 2.90 GHz suggesting a focus on sustained single-thread throughput.

The Verdict

The data supports different conclusions for different user profiles. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 demonstrates strong measured performance across the board, with an 84th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 34222. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth position it as a capable mobile processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16014.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 11676 indicate solid multithreaded capability. The PassMark data compression score of 304089 is exceptional and suggests strong memory subsystem performance.

The Intel Core 3 201TE presents a different value proposition based on specifications alone. Its 4-core, 8-thread design with a 2.90 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost clock targets desktop users who may prioritize lower core counts with higher base frequencies. The 45 watt TDP indicates a more power-hungry design than the AMD part's 28 watts. Support for DDR4 memory gives it flexibility for older platforms, and ECC support adds reliability features absent from the AMD chip. The Gen 5 PCIe implementation offers future-proofing for high-bandwidth devices. Its 50th percentile ranking, while based on no measured benchmarks, places it in the middle of the CPU distribution.

For multithreaded workloads, the recorded data favors the AMD processor decisively. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides double the parallel execution resources of the Intel part. For workloads that depend on single-thread performance, the Intel processor's higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz suggests an advantage, though the AMD processor's higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz could close that gap under boost conditions.

The AMD processor suits users who need proven, measured performance in a mobile form factor with lower power consumption. The Intel processor suits desktop users who require ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, or DDR4 compatibility, and who are willing to accept a lower core count. The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means its actual performance remains unverified, while the AMD part's 17 recorded scores provide concrete evidence of its capabilities. Users requiring immediate, tested performance should favor the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. Users with specific platform requirements that the Intel processor uniquely satisfies should evaluate the Intel Core 3 201TE based on its specification sheet, recognizing that its performance has not yet been measured in the database.