AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Processor U301L Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and the Intel Processor U301L occupy different tiers of the mobile processor market, and the recorded data reflects that separation clearly. The AMD part, built on a 4 nm TSMC process with a Krackan Point design, delivers a substantial performance profile across every measured benchmark. The Intel Processor U301L, a Raptor Lake-PS part on Intel’s 10 nm node, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which makes direct numerical comparison impossible. The analysis below relies on the available specifications, the AMD processor’s benchmark results, and its position within the broader CPU landscape.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a full set of measured scores, while the Intel Processor U301L lists no benchmark results at all. This absence of data is itself informative. The AMD part’s average benchmark score is 29461, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Processor U301L sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, indicating that no performance measurements have been recorded for it.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, the Cinebench results show a multi-core score of 1712 in Cinebench R15 and 11461 in Cinebench R23. The single-core scores are 271 and 1818 for R15 and R23 respectively. PassMark tests further detail the processor’s capabilities. The multi-thread score is 19927, and the single-thread score is 3875. Integer math reaches 63475, floating point math reaches 42621, and extended instructions score 17003. Data compression scores 237484, data encryption scores 11814, and random string sorting scores 25435. The physics test yields 1089, and the find prime numbers test yields 62.

Without any Intel Processor U301L benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison cannot be quantified. The data shows that the AMD processor is an active, measured part with a strong performance footprint. The Intel part is also marked as active in production, but its performance characteristics remain unmeasured in this database. This means any claim about which processor wins a specific workload cannot be supported by recorded numbers. The only factual statement available is that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 delivers the scores listed above, and the Intel Processor U301L has none listed.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 offer context for its performance level. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has an average score of 29447, a delta of 0 percent from the Ryzen AI 7 345’s 29461. The AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409, which is 0.2 percent lower. The Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, 0.7 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656, which is 0.7 percent ahead of the Ryzen AI 7 345. These deltas show the Ryzen AI 7 345 operating in a tight cluster with these established desktop and mobile parts, all within roughly one percent of each other in average benchmark score.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345: it is a measured, competitive mobile processor that holds its own against several well-known desktop and high-end mobile CPUs. Its 81st percentile ranking and average score of 29461 indicate strong overall performance. The nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and Intel Core i5-13500HX, are all within one percent of its average score, which suggests that the Ryzen AI 7 345 delivers performance in the same class as those parts despite being a 28 watt mobile chip.

The Intel Processor U301L presents a different situation. With no benchmark scores in the database, there is no performance evidence to analyze. Its 50th percentile ranking and average score of 0 reflect the absence of measurements, not a performance verdict. The specifications show a 5 core, 6 thread processor with a 1.20 GHz base clock and 2.20 GHz boost clock, a 15 watt TDP, and Intel UHD Graphics 64EU. These figures indicate a lower-power, lower-clock design compared to the AMD part, but without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm how that translates into real-world performance.

From the data alone, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the processor with demonstrated performance. It has measured scores across Cinebench and PassMark suites, a high percentile ranking, and a competitive position against known rivals. The Intel Processor U301L is a processor that exists in the database with specifications but no measured output. Users seeking a processor with verified performance data would find it only in the AMD part. The Intel part’s 15 watt TDP and lower clock speeds suggest a focus on efficiency, but the database does not provide scores to evaluate that efficiency.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: Yes. It has scores for Cinebench R15 multi-core (1712), Cinebench R15 single-core (271), Cinebench R23 multi-core (11461), Cinebench R23 single-core (1818), and multiple PassMark tests including multi-thread (19927), single-thread (3875), integer math (63475), and floating point math (42621).

Q: Does the Intel Processor U301L have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark results for the Intel Processor U301L. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 29461. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X scores 29447 (0 percent delta), the AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409 (0.2 percent lower), the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270 (0.7 percent lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656 (0.7 percent higher).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Processor U301L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Processor U301L has a TDP of 15 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor U301L uses 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.20 GHz. TDP differs significantly: 28 watts for the AMD part versus 15 watts for the Intel part.

The sockets are different. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Processor U301L uses Intel Socket 1700. The manufacturing process also differs, with the AMD part on a 4 nm node from TSMC and the Intel part on a 10 nm node from Intel. Cache configurations vary. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. PCI Express support differs as well. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 64EU.

The release dates are different. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 was released on 2025-01-14, while the Intel Processor U301L was released on 2024-04-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $107. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000002122, and the Intel part number is SRPKFQ5CW.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is built on the Krackan Point architecture, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation that uses both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor U301L uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS variant, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. These architectural choices have direct implications for the measured data. The AMD part’s higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz and larger thread count of 12 contribute to its strong multi-threaded scores, such as the 11461 in Cinebench R23. The Intel part’s lower clock speeds and fewer threads suggest a design aimed at lower power consumption, consistent with its 15 watt TDP, but no benchmark data confirms this.

Cache architecture also differs. The AMD part allocates 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part allocates 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger shared L3 on the Intel part could benefit certain workloads, but again, no measured scores exist to verify this. The AMD part’s memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, a figure that reflects its DDR5 and LPDDR5X support. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 but has no recorded bandwidth figure.

The integrated graphics differ in name and likely capability. The AMD Radeon 840M is paired with the Krackan Point design, while the Intel UHD Graphics 64EU is standard for Raptor Lake-PS. The database does not include graphics benchmarks for either processor, so no performance comparison is possible. The AMD part’s PCIe configuration offers 14 Gen 4 lanes, while the Intel part offers 8 Gen 4 lanes. This difference could affect expandability in systems that rely on CPU-attached devices.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins in every measurable category because it is the only processor with recorded benchmark scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11461 and PassMark multi-thread score of 19927 indicate strong multi-threaded performance. Its single-core scores, 1818 in Cinebench R23 and 3875 in PassMark, show solid single-thread capability. The AMD part’s 81st percentile ranking places it above the majority of CPUs in the database, and its average score of 29461 is within one percent of several established desktop and mobile parts.

The Intel Processor U301L has no recorded wins in the database. Its specifications suggest areas where it might excel, such as lower power consumption with a 15 watt TDP, but no measured data supports a performance claim. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on its specification profile, not on benchmark results. The Intel part’s support for DDR4 memory could be an advantage in systems where DDR4 is preferred, and its 8 MB of shared L3 cache is larger than the AMD part’s 4 MB, but these are specification differences, not demonstrated wins.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 also wins in the comparison of production status and measurement completeness. It is an active part with a full benchmark profile, a launch date of 2025-01-14, and a clear position among its nearest rivals. The Intel Processor U301L is also active, with a launch date of 2024-04-07 and a launch MSRP of $107, but it lacks any performance measurements. For any workload that relies on CPU compute, the database only supports the AMD part. The data confirms that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is a capable mobile processor with verified performance across a range of tests, while the Intel Processor U301L remains an unmeasured specification sheet.