AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
Processor 300T
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Processor 300T
The Verdict
The recorded data positions the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 as the substantially stronger processor in almost every measurable category. With 6 cores and 12 threads against the Intel Processor 300T's 2 cores and 4 threads, the Ryzen AI 7 345 delivers a multi-threaded workload advantage that the Intel part cannot counter. The AMD chip's average benchmark score of 29461 places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Processor 300T sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores in the database.
The Ryzen AI 7 345 is the clear choice for any workload that benefits from parallel processing, heavy compute, or integrated graphics capability. The Intel Processor 300T, with its higher 3.40 GHz base clock but no boost clock data, serves a different role entirely: a low-power desktop part with a modest 35 W TDP and a simpler 2-core configuration. The data does not support the Intel part for demanding tasks; it exists in the database as a basic desktop processor with minimal specifications.
Benchmark data indicates the AMD part's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (delta 0%), the AMD EPYC 9654 (delta 0.2%), and the Intel Core i5-13500HX (delta 0.7%). The Ryzen AI 7 345 essentially matches the Ryzen 7 3800X in average score, a desktop chip from a previous generation, which underscores how capable this mobile processor is. The Intel Processor 300T has no nearest rivals listed, no benchmark scores, and no average score, meaning the database contains no performance evidence for it.
Architecture Differences
The architectural gap between these two processors is fundamental. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the Krackan Point codename, belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, and is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference alone, 4 nm versus 10 nm, explains a significant portion of the efficiency and performance disparity.
The core configurations differ sharply. The AMD part provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part provides 2 cores and 4 threads. Both use an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the L2 and L3 caches diverge. The Ryzen AI 7 345 has 1 MB L2 per core and a 4 MB L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300T has 1.25 MB L2 per core and a 6 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part actually holds a cache advantage in L3 capacity, but this does not compensate for the 4-core thread deficit.
Socket and platform support also differ completely. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile socket, while the Intel Processor 300T uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The AMD part is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, and the Intel part is a desktop processor with a 35 W TDP. Memory support shows the AMD chip accepting DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel operation and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip accepts DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel operation, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for it.
Integrated graphics further separate the two. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 includes the Radeon 840M, while the Intel Processor 300T includes UHD Graphics 710. PCIe support differs as well: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), and the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support is a genuine advantage for platform connectivity, but it does not appear in any benchmark results.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database provides no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and the Intel Processor 300T. The Intel Processor 300T has an empty benchmarks array, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals. Consequently, every performance statement about the Intel part must be inferred from its specification sheet rather than measured results.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, by contrast, has a full set of recorded scores. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 11461. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1818. Cinebench R15 multi-core yields 1712, and Cinebench R15 single-core yields 271. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 19927, a single-thread score of 3875, integer math at 63475, floating-point math at 42621, extended instructions at 17003, data compression at 237484, data encryption at 11814, find prime numbers at 62, random string sorting at 25435, and physics at 1089. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 29461, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 81.
Because the Intel Processor 300T has no scores in the database, any comparison is one-sided. The data shows the AMD part's performance envelope in detail, while the Intel part's performance envelope is unmeasured. The nearest rivals to the AMD part provide context: the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X scores 29447 (delta 0%), the AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409 (delta 0.2%), the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270 (delta 0.7%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656 (delta -0.7%). The Ryzen AI 7 345 sits squarely among these established processors, slightly ahead of the Ryzen 7 3800X and the EPYC 9654, and slightly behind the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every specification field recorded in the database.
Cores and threads: AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.
Clock speeds: The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock listed.
TDP: The AMD part is rated at 28 W. The Intel part is rated at 35 W.
Socket: The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.
Process node and foundry: The AMD part is 4 nm at TSMC. The Intel part is 10 nm at Intel.
Die size: The AMD part has no die size recorded. The Intel part is 163 mm².
Cache: Both have 80 KB L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB L2 per core and 4 MB L3. The Intel part has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 6 MB shared L3.
Memory support: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel. The AMD part records 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth; the Intel part has no bandwidth figure.
PCIe: The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Integrated graphics: The AMD part uses Radeon 840M. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 710.
Market segment: The AMD part is mobile. The Intel part is desktop.
Release date: The AMD part released on 2025-01-14. The Intel part released on 2024-01-07.
Launch MSRP: The Intel Processor 300T has a launch MSRP of $82. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has no launch MSRP recorded.
ECC memory: Both are listed as false.
Multiplier unlocked: Both are listed as false.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has an average benchmark score of 29461. The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0.
Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 29461 on average, which is 0% different from the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (29447), 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9654 (29409), 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29270), and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656).
Q: What are the TDP ratings for the two processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 W.
Q: What process nodes are used by each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T uses a 10 nm process at Intel.
Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors include?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 includes the Radeon 840M. The Intel Processor 300T includes the UHD Graphics 710.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins in every benchmark category for which the database has recorded results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11461 and PassMark multi-thread score of 19927 reflect a processor built for substantial parallel workloads. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration, combined with the 4 nm process and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, makes it suitable for mobile compute tasks that require sustained throughput. Its single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1818 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3875. The Radeon 840M integrated graphics provides a level of graphical capability that the Intel UHD Graphics 710 does not match in the recorded data.
The Intel Processor 300T wins only in areas that do not involve measured performance. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz is higher than the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base clock, which may indicate faster single-thread responsiveness at low load, but no boost clock is recorded to confirm peak behavior. Its L3 cache of 6 MB shared is larger than the AMD part's 4 MB L3. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes exceeds the AMD part's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Its die size of 163 mm² is recorded, while the AMD part's die size is not. Its launch MSRP of $82 is the only price data in the database, and the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.
The market segment split is clear: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, and the Intel Processor 300T is a desktop processor with a 35 W TDP. The AMD part's release date of 2025-01-14 is roughly one year after the Intel part's release date of 2024-01-07. The database contains no benchmark evidence for the Intel Processor 300T, so its strengths remain speculative and limited to its specification sheet. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, by contrast, delivers a complete, measured performance profile that places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Ryzen 7 3800X and the Core i5-13500HX. Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the performance winner, and the Intel Processor 300T is a basic desktop part with no measured performance to justify selection for compute-intensive tasks.