AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and Intel Processor 300 occupy different market segments entirely, and the benchmark data reflects that split. The AMD chip is a mobile processor with 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part is a desktop processor with 2 cores and 4 threads. The recorded benchmarks for the AMD chip cover a wide range of workloads, from Cinebench rendering to PassMark math and encryption tests. The Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its wins cannot be quantified directly.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 shows its strength in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 11461 points. Its single-core score in the same test is 1818. The PassMark multi-thread score is 19927, with a single-thread score of 3875. Data compression in PassMark reaches 237484, while integer math scores 63475 and floating-point math scores 42621. These numbers indicate a processor that handles both parallel rendering tasks and sustained compute workloads.

The Intel Processor 300, with no benchmark entries in the database, cannot be placed in the same workload categories. Its hardware profile suggests different usage: a 2-core, 4-thread desktop chip with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no boost clock listed. The data does not include any performance measurements for this part, so any performance comparison must rely on the architectural and specification differences alone.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the Krackan Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference alone, 4 nm versus 10 nm, indicates a significant generational gap in manufacturing technology.

The core configurations differ sharply. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip has 2 cores and 4 threads. Clock behavior also differs: AMD lists a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Intel lists a base clock of 3.90 GHz but no boost clock in the data. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 46 watts, meaning the mobile AMD part draws less power despite having more cores.

Cache layouts are distinct as well. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 per core and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has a die size of 163 mm², while no die size is recorded for the AMD chip.

Memory support diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 14 CPU-only lanes. The Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 710. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 for the mobile chip, Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop chip.

Release timing is close. The Intel Processor 300 launched on 2024-01-07. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 launched on 2025-01-14. Both are listed as active in production. The AMD chip has a part number of 100-000002122, while the Intel chip has a part number of SRN3J.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no boost clock listed in the database.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Processor 300 supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU-only lanes.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. Neither processor supports ECC memory, according to the recorded data.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300 is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor has the higher TDP?

A: The Intel Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 watts. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a TDP of 28 watts.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field. Core count: AMD has 6, Intel has 2. Thread count: AMD has 12, Intel has 4. Base clock: AMD at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 3.90 GHz. Boost clock: AMD at 4.60 GHz, Intel has none listed. TDP: AMD at 28 watts, Intel at 46 watts. Socket: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: AMD at 4 nm from TSMC, Intel at 10 nm from Intel. Die size: Intel at 163 mm², AMD has no recorded die size. L2 cache per core: AMD at 1 MB, Intel at 1.25 MB. L3 cache: AMD at 4 MB, Intel at 6 MB shared. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD at 89.6 GB/s, Intel has no recorded bandwidth.

PCIe generation and lanes: AMD uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon 840M versus Intel UHD Graphics 710. Market segment: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. Part number: AMD 100-000002122, Intel SRN3J. Launch date: AMD on 2025-01-14, Intel on 2024-01-07. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $82, while the AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded. Both have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports unlocked overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database is empty, and the Intel Processor 300 has no individual benchmark scores recorded. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, however, has a full set of measurements. In Cinebench R23, the AMD chip scores 11461 in multi-core and 1818 in single-core. In the older Cinebench R15, it scores 1712 multi-core and 271 single-core. These are the only rendering scores available.

The PassMark results for the AMD chip show a broad compute profile. Data compression scores 237484, which is the highest single score in the AMD benchmark set. Integer math scores 63475, floating-point math scores 42621, and extended instructions score 17003. Random string sorting scores 25435. Data encryption scores 11814. Find prime numbers scores 62, which is a low absolute number but reflects the specific workload. Physics scores 1089. The multithread score is 19927, and the single-thread score is 3875. The average benchmark score for the AMD chip is 29461, placing it at the 81st percentile among all CPUs in the database.

The nearest rivals for the AMD chip provide context. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has an average score of 29447, which is essentially identical with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409, a 0.2 percent difference. The Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, putting the Ryzen AI 7 345 ahead by 0.7 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656, which is 0.7 percent ahead of the Ryzen AI 7 345. These deltas are small, indicating that the Ryzen AI 7 345 sits in a tight performance cluster around the 29400 to 29650 average score range.

Because the Intel Processor 300 has no measured scores and no rivals listed, a direct numerical comparison between the two products is impossible from the database. The data does not contain a single shared benchmark result. What can be said is that the AMD chip delivers a substantial multi-threaded workload capability with a 81st percentile ranking, while the Intel chip has no recorded performance data at all.

The Verdict

The database presents two processors with different intended roles. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is a mobile chip with 6 cores, 12 threads, a 28 watt TDP, and a complete benchmark record. It ranks at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29461. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, scores 29447, a 0 percent delta. The Intel Core i5-13500HX trails by 0.7 percent.

The Intel Processor 300 is a desktop chip with 2 cores, 4 threads, a 46 watt TDP, and no recorded benchmarks. Its percentile ranking is 50, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. It has no nearest rivals in the database. The only quantitative facts available for this part are its specifications and its launch MSRP of $82.

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the only one of the two with measurable performance. It delivers multi-core scores that place it alongside desktop processors like the Ryzen 7 3800X and ahead of the Core i5-13500HX in average score. The Intel Processor 300 cannot be compared on performance because no measurements exist. A buyer choosing between these two parts would be selecting between a mobile processor with proven benchmark results and a desktop processor whose performance is entirely unrecorded in the database. The AMD chip uses a smaller process node, supports LPDDR5X memory, and carries a lower TDP. The Intel chip offers PCIe Gen 5, a higher base clock, and a larger L3 cache. Without Intel benchmark data, the performance verdict falls to the AMD part by default.