AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
Core i5-14400
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core i5-14400
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and the Intel Core i5-14400 is decisively lopsided, with Intel claiming 13 of the 15 recorded tests. The largest margin appears in Cinebench R23 multicore, where the Intel Core i5-14400 scores 21,315 against the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345's 11,461, a delta of 46.2 percent. That is the single biggest gap in the entire dataset, indicating a substantial difference in sustained multi-threaded throughput. Cinebench R15 multicore tells a similar story, with Intel ahead by 20.3 percent (2,148 versus 1,712), while PassMark multithread shows a 20.5 percent advantage for Intel (25,080 versus 19,927).
Single-core results are mixed. In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel leads by 10.6 percent (303 versus 271), and in Cinebench R23 single-core the gap widens to 39.6 percent (3,009 versus 1,818). However, PassMark single-thread flips the outcome: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 3,875, which is 3.6 percent higher than Intel's 3,741. This split suggests the two processors handle single-threaded workloads differently depending on the benchmark methodology. The AMD part wins both PassMark single-thread entries (the database lists the same result twice under slightly different test names), giving it exactly two wins total.
The remaining PassMark suite is uniformly favorable to Intel. Data compression shows Intel ahead by 24.6 percent (314,995 versus 237,484). Data encryption favors Intel by 29.4 percent (16,731 versus 11,814). Floating point math, often a good indicator of raw compute capability, gives Intel a 30.8 percent edge (61,549 versus 42,621). Integer math is closer but still Intel-favored at 22.6 percent (82,017 versus 63,475). Extended instructions show a 14.2 percent Intel lead (19,816 versus 17,003), which is the narrowest margin outside the single-thread PassMark result. Prime number finding, physics, and random string sorting all land in a tight band of Intel advantages between 21.4 and 22.5 percent.
The overall averages reflect this dominance. The Intel Core i5-14400 posts an average benchmark score of 32,115, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 averages 29,461. The percentile rankings are nearly identical, with Intel at the 82nd percentile and AMD at the 81st, meaning both processors sit close to each other in the broader database distribution despite the Intel lead in most individual tests. The nearest rivals for the AMD part include the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (average score 29,447, delta 0 percent) and the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29,270, delta 0.7 percent). The Intel Core i5-14400 sits near the Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121, delta 0 percent) and the Intel Core i7-13705H (32,076, delta 0.1 percent).
The Verdict
The data points to a straightforward conclusion for raw throughput: the Intel Core i5-14400 is the stronger processor in nearly every measured category. Its 46.2 percent lead in Cinebench R23 multicore is the standout result, and its consistent advantages across compression, encryption, math, and physics workloads indicate a processor that simply sustains higher output under load. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 does not win any multi-threaded test in the database. Its only recorded wins are the two PassMark single-thread entries, and even there the margin is modest at 3.6 percent.
The Intel part also wins both Cinebench single-core tests, including a 39.6 percent margin in R23 single-core. That is a large gap for a workload that typically favors architectural efficiency. The AMD processor's PassMark single-thread win suggests it has competitive per-thread capability in some conditions, but the Cinebench results undercut that narrative. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is a 28-watt mobile part, while the Intel Core i5-14400 is a 65-watt desktop processor. That power class difference explains much of the performance split, but the database records only the benchmark outcomes, not power-normalized efficiency.
For a user prioritizing multi-threaded compute, the Intel Core i5-14400 is the clear choice. For a user prioritizing a single PassMark single-thread metric, the AMD part has a narrow edge. The overall average benchmark score also favors Intel by roughly 9 percent (32,115 versus 29,461). The AMD processor's position near the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and Intel Core i5-13500HX in its nearest rival list suggests it competes at a lower performance tier, while the Intel part aligns with the Intel Core i7-12800H and Intel Core i9-11900.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins only in PassMark single-thread performance, with a score of 3,875 against Intel's 3,741. This indicates that in at least one single-threaded test methodology, the AMD architecture delivers slightly higher per-core performance. The win is small, just 3.6 percent, but it is consistent across both recorded entries for that test. No other benchmark in the database favors the AMD processor.
The Intel Core i5-14400 wins every other recorded test. Its advantages cluster in three groups. First, heavy multi-threaded synthesis: Cinebench R15 multicore (20.3 percent), Cinebench R23 multicore (46.2 percent), and PassMark multithread (20.5 percent). Second, computational math: floating point (30.8 percent), integer (22.6 percent), and prime number finding (22.5 percent). Third, data manipulation: compression (24.6 percent), encryption (29.4 percent), and random string sorting (21.4 percent). The Intel part also wins the Cinebench single-core tests, with margins of 10.6 percent in R15 and 39.6 percent in R23.
The pattern suggests the Intel Core i5-14400 is the more versatile processor across the benchmark suite. Its wins span every category except the single PassMark single-thread test. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, by contrast, shows a narrow single-thread strength but does not translate that into victories in any other workload.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400 averages 32,115, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 averages 29,461.
Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?
A: Cinebench R23 multicore shows the biggest difference, with the Intel Core i5-14400 ahead by 46.2 percent (21,315 versus 11,461).
Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 win any benchmark?
A: Yes, it wins PassMark single-thread with a score of 3,875 versus 3,741 for Intel, a 3.6 percent margin. The database lists this result twice.
Q: How do the processors rank among all CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400 sits at the 82nd percentile, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 sits at the 81st percentile.
Q: What are the nearest rivals for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is nearest to the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (29,447 average, 0 percent delta) and the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29,270, 0.7 percent). The Intel Core i5-14400 is nearest to the Intel Core i7-12800H (32,121, 0 percent) and the Intel Core i7-13705H (32,076, 0.1 percent).
Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head tests?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400 wins 13 of the 15 recorded head-to-head benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins 2.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC and uses the Krackan Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14400, in contrast, uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with the Raptor Lake architecture and the Raptor Lake-R codename. It is part of the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.
The core configurations differ sharply. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both have an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major split, with AMD offering 4 MB and Intel offering 20 MB shared. The AMD processor integrates Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 730.
The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. The AMD part does not support ECC memory, while the Intel part does. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8 and 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). The Intel die size is recorded as 215 mm², while the AMD die size is not listed.
Specification Differences
The base clock of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is 2.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14400 has a base clock of 2.50 GHz. The boost clocks are closer: 4.60 GHz for AMD and 4.70 GHz for Intel. The thermal design power differs substantially, with AMD at 28 watts and Intel at 65 watts. The AMD processor is classified as a mobile part, while the Intel processor is a desktop part.
The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, versus 10 cores and 16 threads for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 4 MB for AMD and 20 MB shared for Intel. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP recorded, while the Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $221. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel processor has a recorded die size of 215 mm², and the AMD processor does not have a listed die size.
The release dates differ by about a year: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 was released on January 14, 2025, and the Intel Core i5-14400 was released on January 7, 2024. Both are marked as active in production. The AMD part number is 100-000002122, and the Intel part number is SRN3QSRN46. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor has 14 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and the Intel processor has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.