AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data splits the two processors across 15 recorded tests, with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 taking 8 wins and the Intel Core 7 360 taking 7. The margins, however, tell a more complex story than the win count suggests.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 dominates in integer-heavy and data-focused workloads. Its most striking victory comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 63475 against Intel's 34238, a 85.4% advantage. Data compression shows a similar gap: AMD delivers 237484 versus 142877, a 66.2% lead. Random string sorting also favors AMD by 44.2% (25435 vs 17636), and extended instructions go AMD's way by 37.2% (17003 vs 12390). These are not marginal differences; they represent substantial throughput advantages in workloads that rely on parallel integer execution.

The AMD chip also wins the older Cinebench R15 tests decisively. In R15 single-core, AMD scores 271 versus Intel's 193, a 40.4% margin. In R15 multi-core, AMD posts 1712 against 1374, a 24.6% lead. The PassMark multithread result reinforces this pattern: AMD scores 19927, which is 28.2% ahead of Intel's 15544. Data encryption is closer, with AMD at 11814 versus 11164, a 5.8% edge.

The Intel Core 7 360 counters with wins in the newer Cinebench R23 tests. In R23 multi-core, Intel scores 13634 against AMD's 11461, a 15.9% advantage. In R23 single-core, Intel leads 1924 to 1818, a 5.5% margin. The single-thread PassMark results also favor Intel: 4274 versus 3875, a 9.3% lead.

Intel's other wins come in specific math and physics workloads. PassMark find prime numbers shows Intel at 120 versus AMD's 62, a 48.3% lead. Floating-point math goes Intel's way by 5.2% (44963 vs 42621). PassMark physics favors Intel by 10.2% (1213 vs 1089).

The overall average benchmark score reflects these differences. AMD's average of 29461 places it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while Intel's average of 18374 lands in the 72nd percentile. AMD's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X at 29447 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 9654 at 29409 (0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13500HX at 29270 (0.7% delta). Intel's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i3-13100 at 18380 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 330 at 18345 (0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i3-14100 at 18318 (0.3% delta).

The pattern is clear: AMD wins heavily in integer, compression, and older multi-threaded tests, while Intel wins in newer Cinebench releases, prime number calculation, floating-point math, and single-thread performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. AMD builds the Ryzen AI 7 345 on a 4 nm process at TSMC, using the Krackan Point codename from the Ryzen AI 300 generation with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel builds the Core 7 360 on a 3 nm process at Intel, using the Wildcat Lake codename from the Core 5 generation.

Core and thread configurations differ significantly. Both have 6 physical cores, but AMD supports 12 threads through simultaneous multithreading, while Intel has 6 threads with no SMT. This explains AMD's large margins in multithreaded integer workloads.

Cache layouts diverge substantially. AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. Intel allocates 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. Intel's larger per-core caches and larger shared L3 likely contribute to its single-thread and floating-point strengths, while AMD's SMT support drives its multi-thread advantages.

Clock speeds also differ. AMD has a 2.00 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost clock. Intel has a 1.50 GHz base clock but a higher 4.80 GHz boost clock. Intel's higher boost clock aligns with its single-thread wins in Cinebench R23 and PassMark.

Power envelopes are not identical. AMD is rated at 28 W TDP, while Intel is rated at 15 W TDP. Intel achieves its single-thread wins within a lower power envelope.

Memory architecture is a major differentiator. AMD supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. AMD's memory bandwidth advantage likely contributes to its data compression and integer math leads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics are distinct. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, and neither supports ECC memory.

Release timing separates the pair. AMD launched on 2025-01-14, while Intel launched on 2026-04-15. Both are active production parts with locked multipliers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 12 threads from 6 cores, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 threads from 6 cores. AMD's SMT support doubles thread count.

Q: Which processor wins in single-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 wins single-thread tests. It leads in Cinebench R23 single-core by 5.5% (1924 vs 1818) and in PassMark single-thread by 9.3% (4274 vs 3875). It also has a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor wins in multi-thread performance?

A: The results are split. AMD wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 24.6% (1712 vs 1374) and PassMark multithread by 28.2% (19927 vs 15544). Intel wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 15.9% (13634 vs 11461).

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: AMD supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. AMD's bandwidth is roughly 50% higher.

Q: Which processor is in a higher performance percentile?

A: AMD ranks in the 81st percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 29461. Intel ranks in the 72nd percentile with an average score of 18374.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. Intel uses a 3 nm process at Intel. Intel's node is smaller, but AMD's design still wins most benchmark categories.

Q: How do the L3 caches compare?

A: Intel has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD has 4 MB of L3 cache. Intel also has larger L1 and L2 allocations per core.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 | Intel Core 7 360 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 6 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Krackan Point | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Release date | 2025-01-14 | 2026-04-15 |

| Part number | 100-000002122 | SAE3E |

The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 7 360 is $426. No launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins in workloads that exploit its 12 threads and dual-channel memory bandwidth. Integer math is its strongest category, with an 85.4% lead over Intel. Data compression follows at 66.2%, random string sorting at 44.2%, and extended instructions at 37.2%. The PassMark multithread result shows a 28.2% advantage. Cinebench R15 multi-core and single-core also favor AMD by 24.6% and 40.4%, respectively. Data encryption is a narrower AMD win at 5.8%. These results indicate AMD is better suited for parallel integer processing, data transformation, and compression workloads. The 89.6 GB/s dual-channel memory bandwidth supports this profile.

The Intel Core 7 360 wins in single-thread-bound tasks and specific math workloads. PassMark single-thread shows a 9.3% lead, and Cinebench R23 single-core is 5.5% ahead. The prime number test is Intel's largest win at 48.3%, followed by physics at 10.2% and floating-point math at 5.2%. Cinebench R23 multi-core also goes to Intel by 15.9%, which is notable given Intel's lack of SMT. The 192 KB L1 and 2.5 MB L2 per core, combined with the 4.80 GHz boost clock, support Intel's single-thread efficiency. The 15 W TDP means Intel delivers these wins within a lower power envelope.

The overall average benchmark score favors AMD by a wide margin: 29461 versus 18374, a difference of over 60%. AMD's percentile ranking of 81st versus Intel's 72nd reflects this gap. However, the choice between the two depends on workload. For integer-heavy data work, compression, and multithreaded throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the stronger part. For single-thread responsiveness, prime number calculation, floating-point math, and physics simulations, the Intel Core 7 360 takes the lead. The two processors also target different memory configurations: AMD's dual-channel support versus Intel's single-channel support, and different PCIe lane counts at 14 versus 6.