AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the only processor in this comparison with benchmark results. The Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded scores in any of the database's test suites, leaving the comparison one-sided. The AMD processor's average benchmark score of 29461 places it at the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero due to missing measurements.

Focusing on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345's absolute results provides the clearest picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 11461 in multi-core and 1818 in single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 1712 multi-core and 271 single-core. These numbers establish a baseline for a 6-core, 12-thread mobile chip with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

The PassMark suite reveals more specific strengths. The data compression test yields a score of 237484, which is the highest single result across all recorded tests. Integer math scores 63475, floating point math reaches 42621, and extended instructions hit 17003. Random string sorting produces 25435, data encryption manages 11814, and the find prime numbers test returns 62. The multithread score is 19927, physics comes in at 1089, and single-thread performance is measured at 3875.

Because the Intel Core 7 150UL has no benchmark entries, there are no head-to-head deltas to report. The nearest rivals for the AMD chip offer context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X holds an average score of 29447, essentially matching the Ryzen AI 7 345 with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409, putting the Ryzen AI 7 345 0.2 percent ahead. The Intel Core i5-13500HX reaches 29270, meaning the Ryzen AI 7 345 leads by 0.7 percent. Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE posts 29656, which is 0.7 percent better than the Ryzen AI 7 345. These narrow margins indicate the Ryzen AI 7 345 performs in a tight cluster with desktop processors from older generations, despite being a low-power mobile part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has recorded benchmark scores?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has benchmark data in the database. The Intel Core 7 150UL has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 345 averages 29461 across all tests. It matches the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (29447, 0 percent delta), leads the AMD EPYC 9654 (29409) by 0.2 percent, leads the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29270) by 0.7 percent, and trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656) by 0.7 percent.

Q: What is the core count difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads. Both processors support 12 threads, but the Intel part has 4 additional physical cores.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Core 7 150UL has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Do these processors use the same socket?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses Intel Socket 1700. They are not interchangeable.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts, making it the lower-power part.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is built on the Krackan Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which uses a hybrid Zen 5 and Zen 5c design. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its cache layout consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. The integrated graphics are handled by the Radeon 840M. The chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes available for the CPU. It was released on January 14, 2025, and carries the part number 100-000002122.

The Intel Core 7 150UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename and belongs to the Core 7 generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The cache organization differs significantly: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, though the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for this chip. ECC memory is not supported. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the CPU. The release date is April 7, 2024, and the part number is listed as unknown.

The process node gap is substantial. The AMD part uses TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel part uses Intel's 10 nm process. The cache strategy also diverges: AMD allocates more L2 per core but less L3 total, whereas Intel provides a larger shared L3 pool. The Intel chip also supports DDR4 memory, which the AMD chip does not, giving it flexibility for older memory platforms. The AMD chip supports LPDDR5X, which the Intel chip does not list.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores. Both have 12 threads. Clock speeds diverge in both directions: the AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz versus 1.70 GHz for Intel, but the Intel boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz for AMD. TDP differs, with the AMD part rated at 28 watts and the Intel part at 15 watts. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 for the Ryzen AI 7 345 and Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 7 150UL.

The manufacturing process differs: 4 nm at TSMC for AMD versus 10 nm at Intel for the Core 7 150UL. Cache allocations differ across L2 and L3: the AMD chip uses 1 MB L2 per core and 4 MB L3, while the Intel chip uses 1.25 MB L2 per core and 12 MB L3. Both share 80 KB L1 per core. Memory support differs, with AMD offering DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and Intel offering DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for AMD at 89.6 GB/s. PCIe lane counts differ: 14 lanes for AMD versus 8 lanes for Intel, both at Gen 4. The integrated graphics differ, with the Radeon 840M on the AMD side and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the Intel side. Market segments differ: the AMD chip is listed as mobile, while the Intel chip is listed as desktop. Release dates differ, with the AMD chip launching on January 14, 2025, and the Intel chip on April 7, 2024.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins in every category where data exists, because the Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmarks. The AMD chip demonstrates strong multi-core throughput with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11461 and a PassMark multithread score of 19927. Its single-thread capability is represented by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1818 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3875. The data compression result of 237484 indicates a strong showing in workloads that rely on compression algorithms. Integer math at 63475 and floating point math at 42621 suggest balanced performance across arithmetic-heavy tasks.

The Intel Core 7 150UL cannot be positioned as a winner in any benchmark category due to the absence of measurements. However, its specifications suggest different design priorities. The higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz could benefit single-threaded workloads, though no test confirms this. The larger 12 MB L3 cache and 10 core count indicate a design aimed at cache-sensitive and multi-threaded tasks, but the database provides no scores to validate this. The lower TDP of 15 watts positions it as a more power-efficient part on paper, but again, no performance-per-watt data exists.

The AMD chip's nearest rivals provide additional context for use cases. Matching the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, a desktop processor, suggests the Ryzen AI 7 345 can deliver desktop-class throughput in a mobile package. Leading the Intel Core i5-13500HX by 0.7 percent shows it competes with high-performance mobile chips. Trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE by only 0.7 percent keeps it within striking distance of workstation-oriented parts.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the measured performer in this comparison. Its average benchmark score of 29461, 81st percentile ranking, and complete suite of tests across Cinebench R15, Cinebench R23, and PassMark provide a full picture of its capabilities. The Intel Core 7 150UL has no benchmark entries, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking, which means it cannot be evaluated against the AMD chip on measured performance.

The AMD processor shows strength in multi-core and single-core workloads, with its Cinebench R23 scores of 11461 and 1818 respectively. Its PassMark results confirm competence across compression, encryption, and math operations. The near-parity with desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 7 3800X and the 0.7 percent lead over the Core i5-13500HX indicate that the Ryzen AI 7 345 punches above its 28 watt TDP.

The Intel Core 7 150UL offers a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz, more cores at 10, a larger 12 MB L3 cache, and lower power consumption at 15 watts. These specifications could appeal to workloads that favor core count and cache capacity, but the database contains no evidence of actual performance. Users requiring verified results would rely on the AMD processor's recorded scores. Users prioritizing the Intel part's specifications would do so without benchmark confirmation. Based strictly on the available data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the only processor with demonstrated performance, and it sits comfortably in the 81st percentile of all CPUs.