AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a full set of benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This creates a one-sided analysis where every measurable performance indicator comes from the AMD processor. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29461. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X at 29447 (0% delta), the AMD EPYC 9654 at 29409 (0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13500HX at 29270 (0.7% delta). The Intel Core 7 150HL holds a 50th percentile ranking, but with no average benchmark score recorded, the database cannot establish a direct performance comparison.

The data suggests that for users selecting between these two processors, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 delivers measurable performance across all tested workloads, while the Intel Core 7 150HL remains unquantified in the database. The AMD part uses 6 cores and 12 threads, operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz, and carries a 28 W TDP. The Intel part uses 14 cores and 20 threads, operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and carries a 45 W TDP. These specifications indicate the Intel processor has more cores and higher clock speeds, but without benchmark data, those specifications cannot be translated into actual performance scores.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 targets the mobile market segment with an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 7 150HL targets the desktop segment with an Intel Socket 1700. This distinction matters for system builders: the AMD processor belongs in mobile platforms, the Intel processor belongs in desktop platforms. The database records no head-to-head benchmark results, no wins for either processor, and no rival comparisons for the Intel part. The verdict rests on what the data shows: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has proven performance across multiple benchmark suites, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has specifications but no measured scores.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins in every recorded benchmark category because it is the only processor with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11461 and single-core score of 1818 demonstrate strong rendering capability. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 19927, a single-thread score of 3875, and specific workload scores including integer math at 63475, floating point math at 42621, and extended instructions at 17003. Data compression scores reach 237484, data encryption reaches 11814, and random string sorting reaches 25435. The find prime numbers score of 62 and physics score of 1089 complete the PassMark picture.

The Intel Core 7 150HL has no wins in the database because no benchmark results exist for it. The processor's specifications suggest potential strengths: 14 cores and 20 threads versus the AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads, plus a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz. The larger L3 cache of 24 MB shared versus 4 MB on the AMD part indicates a different cache architecture. However, the database records no scores to confirm whether these specifications translate into actual performance advantages.

The use-case split based on benchmark wins is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 delivers measurable results across rendering, general computation, and specialized workloads. The Intel Core 7 150HL offers no measured results, so no workload category shows a win for it. The data implies the AMD processor suits users who need verified performance numbers, while the Intel processor remains a specification-only option.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the Krackan Point codename from the Ryzen AI 300 generation, built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm from TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename from the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process from Intel. These process nodes differ significantly: the AMD part uses a 4 nm node, the Intel part uses a 10 nm node.

Core configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel part offers more than double the core count and 8 additional threads. Cache structures also differ: the AMD part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 4 MB L3. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The Intel L2 cache doubles the AMD per-core amount, and the L3 cache is six times larger.

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure. The AMD part enables LPDDR5X, which the Intel part does not list.

PCIe configurations show the AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part offers more PCIe lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD processor uses Radeon 840M, the Intel processor uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both are locked multipliers.

The release dates differ: the AMD processor released on 2025-01-14, the Intel processor released on 2024-04-07. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000002122, while the Intel part number is recorded as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel processor provides 8 additional cores and 8 additional threads.

Q: What benchmark scores exist for the Intel Core 7 150HL?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the Intel Core 7 150HL. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. All benchmark measurements come from the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has an average benchmark score of 29461. It sits 0% above the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (29447), 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 9654 (29409), and 0.7% above the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29270). It sits 0.7% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656).

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150HL uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 7 150HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use dual-channel buses, but only the AMD processor has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What market segments do these processors target?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 targets the mobile market segment with an AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core 7 150HL targets the desktop market segment with an Intel Socket 1700.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and the Intel Core 7 150HL. The wins count stands at 0 for both processors. This absence of direct comparison data means the analysis relies entirely on the AMD processor's measured scores and the Intel processor's specifications.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11461 places it in a competitive position among processors, as its 81st percentile ranking indicates. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1712 and single-core score of 271 provide additional rendering data points. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19927 and single-thread score of 3875 show general computational capability. The integer math score of 63475 and floating point math score of 42621 demonstrate arithmetic processing strength. Data compression at 237484 and random string sorting at 25435 show data handling capabilities. Data encryption at 11814 and extended instructions at 17003 complete the specialized workload picture.

The Intel Core 7 150HL offers no benchmark scores to compare. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it in the middle of all CPUs, but without an average benchmark score, this ranking lacks supporting data. The nearest rivals list is empty, providing no reference points for relative performance. The processor's specifications suggest it could compete in multi-threaded workloads given its 14 cores and 20 threads, but the database cannot confirm this without measurements.

The biggest wins in this comparison are all attributed to the AMD processor by default. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11461 and PassMark multi-thread score of 19927 represent its strongest recorded results. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1818 and PassMark single-thread score of 3875 show its per-thread capability. The data compression score of 237484 stands out as the highest individual measurement. These numbers provide a baseline for what the AMD processor achieves, while the Intel processor's performance remains unquantified.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. Core count: AMD has 6 cores, Intel has 14 cores. Thread count: AMD has 12 threads, Intel has 20 threads. Base clock: AMD operates at 2.00 GHz, Intel operates at 2.40 GHz. Boost clock: AMD reaches 4.60 GHz, Intel reaches 5.00 GHz. TDP: AMD uses 28 W, Intel uses 45 W.

Socket types differ completely: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor uses the Krackan Point codename from the Ryzen AI 300 generation with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel processor uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename from the Raptor Lake architecture. Process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm from Intel.

Cache configurations show differences at the L2 and L3 levels. Both use 80 KB L1 per core. The AMD processor uses 1 MB L2 per core and 4 MB L3. The Intel processor uses 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for AMD at 89.6 GB/s; Intel has no recorded bandwidth.

PCIe lanes differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), Intel provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. Market segments differ: AMD targets mobile, Intel targets desktop. Release dates differ: AMD released on 2025-01-14, Intel released on 2024-04-07. The AMD part number is 100-000002122; the Intel part number is unknown. Both processors lack ECC support, have locked multipliers, and are in active production.