AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core 5 330 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and Intel Core 5 330 are both mobile processors aimed at thin-and-light systems, but the benchmark data reveals two very different performance profiles. The AMD part wins 8 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel part wins 7, yet the margins are lopsided in opposite directions. AMD’s victories are often decisive, with several deltas above 30%, while Intel’s wins are mostly narrow, with one notable exception in prime number computation. The average benchmark scores reinforce this split: the Ryzen AI 7 345 sits at 29,461, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 5 330 averages 18,345, landing in the 72nd percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 63,475 against Intel’s 33,258, a delta of 90.9% in AMD’s favor. This is the most pronounced gap in the entire comparison and suggests that the AMD architecture handles integer-heavy workloads with far greater efficiency. Data compression shows a similarly emphatic result: AMD scores 237,484 versus Intel’s 145,287, a 63.5% advantage. Random string sorting also swings heavily toward AMD, with a score of 25,435 compared to 17,771, a 43.1% delta. Extended instructions follow the same pattern, with AMD at 17,003 and Intel at 12,808, a 32.8% lead.

The Cinebench R15 results are also strongly in AMD’s favor. In the multicore test, AMD scores 1,712 against Intel’s 1,325, a 29.2% advantage. The single-core R15 result is even more lopsided: AMD scores 271 versus Intel’s 186, a 45.7% delta. These R15 numbers indicate that AMD’s Zen 5 cores deliver substantially higher throughput in this older benchmark suite. The PassMark multithread test aligns with this trend, with AMD at 19,927 and Intel at 15,471, a 28.8% win. Data encryption is a closer affair, but AMD still takes it with 11,814 versus 11,076, a 6.7% edge.

Intel’s wins are concentrated in different areas. The largest Intel victory is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where Intel scores 114 against AMD’s 62, a 45.6% margin in Intel’s favor. This is an unusual result, as prime number computation is typically a single-threaded integer workload, and it suggests that Intel’s core design has a specific advantage in this particular algorithm. The Cinebench R23 multicore test also goes to Intel, with a score of 13,150 versus AMD’s 11,461, a 12.8% lead. This is notable because it contradicts the R15 multicore result, indicating that the newer Cinebench version scales differently across these two architectures.

The remaining Intel wins are narrow. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 1,856 against AMD’s 1,818, a marginal 2% delta. PassMark floating point math goes to Intel with 43,885 versus 42,621, a 2.9% edge. The PassMark physics test shows Intel ahead at 1,201 versus 1,089, a 9.3% margin. Finally, in PassMark single-thread, Intel scores 4,088 against AMD’s 3,875, a 5.2% advantage. These results show that Intel holds a consistent, albeit modest, lead in single-threaded and floating-point workloads, while AMD dominates in integer and multi-threaded tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has an average benchmark score of 29,461, compared to 18,345 for the Intel Core 5 330. AMD also sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while Intel is in the 72nd percentile.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core 5 330 wins this test with a score of 13,150, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 11,461. Intel holds a 12.8% advantage in this benchmark.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark integer math, where the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 63,475 versus 33,258 for the Intel Core 5 330, a 90.9% delta.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 330 have any significant wins?

A: Yes, in the PassMark find prime numbers test, Intel scores 114 versus AMD’s 62, a 45.6% lead. Intel also wins Cinebench R23 multicore by 12.8%, but its other wins are all below 10%.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 330 has 6 threads. Both have 6 cores.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth specifications?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 330 has a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is clearly the stronger choice for integer-heavy and multi-threaded workloads. Its 90.9% lead in integer math and 63.5% lead in data compression point to a processor that excels at data processing, database operations, and general productivity tasks that rely on integer arithmetic. The 43.1% advantage in random string sorting reinforces this, as sorting algorithms are often integer-bound. The 28.8% win in PassMark multithread and 29.2% win in Cinebench R15 multicore show that the 12 threads provide a tangible benefit in parallel workloads, even though the Cinebench R23 multicore result goes the other way.

The Intel Core 5 330 wins in several specific scenarios. The 45.6% lead in find prime numbers is a clear signal for mathematical computations that use this specific algorithm. The Cinebench R23 multicore win, despite the processor having only 6 threads, indicates that in newer rendering workloads, Intel’s core efficiency can overcome the thread count disadvantage. The narrow wins in floating point math, physics, and single-thread tests suggest that Intel has a slight edge in scientific computing and single-threaded applications. The 5.2% single-thread lead, while small, is consistent across both PassMark single-thread entries.

For users who prioritize multi-threaded productivity, data compression, and integer-heavy tasks, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the clear winner. For those who run workloads that are single-threaded, floating-point heavy, or specifically involve prime number computation, the Intel Core 5 330 offers measurable advantages. The Cinebench R23 multicore result complicates the picture slightly, but the overall trend is that AMD dominates in throughput, while Intel wins in specific algorithmic niches.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several fundamental specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 330 has 6 cores and 6 threads. AMD’s base clock is 2.00 GHz, and its boost clock is 4.60 GHz. Intel’s base clock is lower at 1.50 GHz, but its boost clock matches at 4.60 GHz. The thermal design power differs significantly: AMD is rated at 28 W, while Intel is at 15 W.

The cache structures are different. AMD uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. Intel uses 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. The process nodes also differ: AMD uses TSMC’s 4 nm process, while Intel uses its own 3 nm process. Memory support is the same in terms of types (DDR5 and LPDDR5X), but AMD’s memory bus is dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel’s is single-channel with 59.7 GB/s.

The sockets are different: AMD uses Socket FP8, and Intel uses BGA 1516. PCIe support also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The integrated graphics are different: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, and Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The release dates are distinct, with AMD launching on 2025-01-14 and Intel on 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $309, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither supports ECC memory.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the higher-performing processor overall, with an average benchmark score of 29,461 compared to 18,345 for the Intel Core 5 330. AMD wins 8 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, and its wins are often by large margins, including the 90.9% integer math advantage and the 63.5% data compression lead. The 12 threads and dual-channel memory bus give AMD a substantial throughput advantage in multi-threaded and memory-sensitive workloads.

The Intel Core 5 330, however, has its own strengths. Its 45.6% win in find prime numbers is the single largest Intel victory, and its 12.8% win in Cinebench R23 multicore shows that it can outperform AMD in at least one modern rendering benchmark. The narrow single-thread and floating-point wins, while small, are consistent. Intel also operates at a lower 15 W TDP, which may be relevant for systems where thermal and power constraints are a priority, though the data does not include power efficiency measurements.

The choice between the two depends on the workload profile. For general productivity, data processing, and multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the stronger option, as indicated by its higher average score and dominant integer performance. For single-threaded tasks, floating-point math, and specific algorithms like prime number computation, the Intel Core 5 330 is the better fit. The Cinebench R23 multicore result suggests that Intel’s architecture can be competitive in certain rendering workloads, but the overall weight of evidence favors AMD in most measured scenarios.