AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core 5 130HL Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and the Intel Core 5 130HL represent two distinct approaches to mobile and desktop processing. The Ryzen AI 7 345 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Krackan Point architecture, built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 5 130HL is a 12-core, 16-thread processor from the Raptor Lake-PS family, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The data in the database provides a clear picture of their respective capabilities, though the comparison is limited by the fact that the Intel Core 5 130HL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a substantial set of measured results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and the Intel Core 5 130HL. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, meaning there are no paired test results where both processors ran the same workload under identical conditions. This absence of direct comparison data means that any analysis of relative performance must rely on the existing recorded scores for the AMD processor and the architectural specifications of the Intel processor.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a complete set of benchmark scores recorded in the database. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 1712, and in Cinebench R15 singlecore, it scores 271. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the score is 11461, while the singlecore score is 1818. These Cinebench results indicate a processor that delivers solid multi-threaded and single-threaded rendering performance for a 28 W mobile part. The PassMark suite adds further detail: data compression scores 237484, data encryption scores 11814, extended instructions score 17003, find prime numbers scores 62, floating point math scores 42621, integer math scores 63475, multithread scores 19927, physics scores 1089, random string sorting scores 25435, and single thread scores 3875. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 29461, and it holds an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database.

The Intel Core 5 130HL has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile ranking is 50. This means the database contains no measured performance data for the Intel processor. The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 7 3800X has an average score of 29447, which is essentially identical to the Ryzen AI 7 345's 29461, indicating parity within a rounding margin. The AMD EPYC 9654 scores 29409, about 0.2% behind, and the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, about 0.7% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29656, about 0.7% ahead. These figures show that the Ryzen AI 7 345 sits within a narrow band of performance around these established processors, despite having fewer cores than some of them. The 12-core Intel Core 5 130HL, by contrast, has no nearest rivals listed in the database because no performance data exists to anchor such comparisons.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, the recorded data shows strengths across a range of workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 19927 indicates robust parallel processing capability. The integer math score of 63475 and floating point math score of 42621 show strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 237484 and random string sorting at 25435 suggest efficient handling of data manipulation tasks. Data encryption at 11814 and extended instructions at 17003 point to capable cryptographic and SIMD workloads. The single thread score of 3875 confirms that the processor also handles lightly threaded tasks well. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 11461 and singlecore score of 1818 reinforce this pattern: the processor delivers both multi-threaded rendering and single-threaded responsiveness.

The Intel Core 5 130HL has no benchmark wins in the database because it has no recorded scores. Its architectural configuration, however, suggests a different performance profile. With 12 cores and 16 threads, it offers more physical cores than the AMD processor. The higher base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz, compared to the AMD's 2.00 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost, indicate higher clock ceilings. The larger L3 cache of 18 MB shared, versus the AMD's 4 MB, implies more capacity for frequently accessed data. These specifications, while not backed by measured scores, point to a processor that could excel in heavily multi-threaded workloads where core count and cache size matter. The AMD processor, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, relies on simultaneous multithreading to reach 12 threads, whereas the Intel processor has 12 physical cores and 16 threads. The Intel part also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD processor has a higher memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth value in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the Krackan Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 5 130HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, part of the Core 5 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which typically indicates a more advanced manufacturing process for the AMD part, potentially offering better power efficiency per transistor.

The core configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel processor has 12 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD processor's L1 cache is 80 KB per core, and its L2 cache is 1 MB per core, with an L3 cache of 4 MB. The Intel processor's L1 cache is also 80 KB per core, but its L2 cache is 2 MB per core, and its L3 cache is 18 MB shared. This gives the Intel processor a significantly larger last-level cache, which can benefit workloads with large working sets.

The thermal design power differs: the AMD processor has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 45 W. This indicates the Intel processor is designed for a higher power envelope, which could support its higher clock speeds but also implies greater cooling requirements. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses the Intel Socket 1700. The market segments differ as well: the AMD processor is classified as Mobile, while the Intel processor is classified as Desktop. The AMD processor's integrated graphics is the Radeon 840M, while the Intel processor uses the Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. The AMD processor supports dual-channel memory with DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth in the database. The AMD processor has PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor has PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD processor was released on 2025-01-14, while the Intel processor was released on 2024-04-07. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. The AMD processor has a part number of 100-000002122, while the Intel processor's part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 130HL have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 130HL has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 15 recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 29461 and an 81st percentile ranking.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345's average benchmark score of 29461 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X at 29447. It is about 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9654 at 29409, about 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500HX at 29270, and about 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE at 29656.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 5 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel processor also has a higher base clock of 2.60 GHz and a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz, compared to the AMD's 2.00 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost.

Q: What are the cache differences between the two processors?

A: Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 130HL has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 5 130HL has a TDP of 45 W. The AMD processor is classified as a mobile part, while the Intel processor is classified as a desktop part.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 130HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth value is recorded in the database.

The Verdict

The database provides a clear performance picture only for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345. Its 81st percentile ranking, average benchmark score of 29461, and complete set of Cinebench and PassMark scores establish it as a capable mobile processor. The nearest rival data shows it performing on par with desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500HX in average score. The Intel Core 5 130HL lacks any measured performance data, so the database cannot confirm its actual performance level. Its specifications indicate a higher core count, higher clock speeds, and a larger L3 cache, but these are unverified by benchmark results. The AMD processor's lower TDP of 28 W and advanced 4 nm process suggest higher efficiency, while the Intel processor's 45 W TDP and 10 nm process suggest a higher power budget. For users relying on measured performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is the only one of the two with recorded data to support a decision. The Intel Core 5 130HL's desktop classification, Socket 1700, and support for DDR4 and DDR5 make it architecturally distinct, but without benchmark scores, its relative performance remains unquantified in the database. The data supports selecting the AMD processor for verified performance in multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks, while the Intel processor's actual standing cannot be assessed from recorded measurements.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is 2.00 GHz for the AMD and 2.60 GHz for the Intel. The boost clock is 4.60 GHz for the AMD and 4.80 GHz for the Intel. The TDP is 28 W for the AMD and 45 W for the Intel. The socket is AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD and Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel. The AMD processor uses the Krackan Point codename from the Ryzen AI 300 generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), while the Intel processor uses the Raptor Lake-PS codename from the Core 5 generation (Raptor Lake). The process node is 4 nm with TSMC as the foundry for the AMD, and 10 nm with Intel as the foundry for the Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for the AMD and 2 MB per core for the Intel. The L3 cache is 4 MB for the AMD and 18 MB shared for the Intel. Memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X for the AMD, and DDR4 and DDR5 for the Intel. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the AMD, with no recorded value for the Intel. PCIe is Gen 4 with 14 lanes for the AMD and Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Intel. The integrated graphics are Radeon 840M for the AMD and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU for the Intel. The market segment is Mobile for the AMD and Desktop for the Intel. The release date is 2025-01-14 for the AMD and 2024-04-07 for the Intel. The production status is Active for both. Neither has a launch MSRP, neither supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.