AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE
Core i5-14490F
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE vs Intel Core i5-14490F
AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE and Intel Core i5-14490F are two very different desktop processors, with the Intel part holding a significant performance advantage across all recorded benchmark metrics. The data shows the Core i5-14490F outperforms the Ryzen AI 5 435GE in every single measured test, making the Intel chip the clear choice for users prioritizing raw compute performance. The Ryzen AI 5 435GE, however, offers a much lower thermal design power (TDP) of 35 watts compared to the Intel chip's 65 watts, alongside a more modern 4nm process node and integrated graphics, positioning it as an efficiency-focused alternative for compact or low-power builds.
The Verdict
Based strictly on the benchmark database, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the dominant performer in this comparison. It wins all 17 recorded benchmark tests, with its multi-threaded scores being particularly impressive. The Core i5-14490F posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000, while the Ryzen AI 5 435GE has no recorded benchmarks at all. The Intel chip also holds an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, compared to the AMD chip's 50th percentile, confirming its superior standing in the overall performance hierarchy.
The Ryzen AI 5 435GE, despite lacking benchmark data, targets a different use case entirely. Its 35-watt TDP is nearly half that of the Intel chip's 65-watt TDP, and it is built on a more advanced 4nm TSMC process node. This combination suggests a processor designed for energy-efficient systems where heat output and power consumption are more critical than peak performance. The presence of integrated Radeon 840M graphics also means it can operate without a discrete GPU, something the Intel Core i5-14490F cannot do with its N/A integrated graphics.
For users building a high-performance desktop with a dedicated graphics card, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the obvious choice given its benchmark dominance and higher CPU percentile ranking. For a low-power, compact system that can run on integrated graphics alone, the Ryzen AI 5 435GE presents a viable option, though its actual performance cannot be verified from the database.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE is part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation, using the Gorgon Point codename, and is built on a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It is manufactured on a 4nm process node at TSMC, which is a more advanced node compared to Intel's 10nm process for the Core i5-14490F. The Intel chip is a Raptor Lake-R part, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and has a die size of 215 mm².
Core configuration is a major differentiator. The Ryzen AI 5 435GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. This gives the Intel chip a 4-core and 4-thread advantage, which directly contributes to its higher multi-threaded performance. Cache layouts also differ, with the AMD chip having 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 is larger at 1.25 MB per core, and its L3 is significantly larger at 24 MB shared.
Platform support diverges as well. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory exclusively, with dual-channel memory and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, but does not support ECC. PCIe connectivity is another clear difference: the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 10 lanes (CPU only).
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE's 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE have integrated graphics?
A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE includes integrated Radeon 840M graphics. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not have integrated graphics, listed as N/A.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not support ECC memory.
Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database.
Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has an 86th percentile ranking, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE sits at the 50th percentile.
Q: What is the difference in thermal design power (TDP)?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65 watts.
Specification Differences
The database records several key differences between the two processors. The core and thread counts differ, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE having 6 cores and 12 threads, and the Intel Core i5-14490F having 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds are 2.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 2.50 GHz for the Intel chip, while boost clocks are 4.50 GHz for the AMD chip and 5.00 GHz for the Intel chip. TDP is 35 watts for AMD and 65 watts for Intel.
The process node and foundry are different: AMD uses a 4nm TSMC process, while Intel uses a 10nm Intel process. The Intel chip has a die size of 215 mm², while the AMD chip has no recorded die size. Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3, with the Intel chip having a larger L2 at 1.25 MB per core versus 1 MB per core, and a larger shared L3 at 24 MB versus 4 MB. Memory support differs in that AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, with no figure recorded for Intel. ECC support is present on AMD but not Intel. PCIe lanes are Gen 4 with 10 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are present on AMD (Radeon 840M) but absent on Intel. The multiplier is unlocked on the AMD chip, while it is locked on the Intel chip. Release dates are also different, with AMD releasing on 2026-02-28 and Intel on 2023-12-31.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Intel Core i5-14490F has recorded benchmarks across Cinebench and PassMark suites, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE has no benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison one-sided, but the Intel chip's results are still meaningful for context.
In Cinebench R23, the Intel chip scores 23000 in multi-core and 3247 in single-core. Its Cinebench R20 scores are 9660 multi-core and 1363 single-core, and its Cinebench R15 scores are 2318 multi-core and 327 single-core. These results show a consistent scaling pattern across the Cinebench versions.
PassMark results for the Intel chip show strong integer and floating-point performance. The integer math score is 87844, floating-point math is 66558, and extended instructions score is 21731. Compression and encryption scores are 340026 and 18225, respectively. The multithread score is 28662, and the single-thread score is 3873, which appears twice in the database under both "passmark_single_thread" and "passmark_singlethread" test names. Physics score is 2093, random string sorting is 35608, and finding prime numbers yields a score of 122.
Given the absence of any AMD benchmarks, the data indicates the Intel Core i5-14490F is ahead in every measurable category. Its average benchmark score is 38149, and its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T with an average score of 38194 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-13600KF with 38103 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 with 38221 and a delta of -0.2%, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX with 38261 and a delta of -0.3%. These rivals are all within a 0.3% range of the Core i5-14490F's average score, indicating the Intel chip is competitively positioned in its performance class.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in all recorded performance benchmarks. Its 10-core, 16-thread configuration, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 24 MB of L3 cache, delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and the PassMark multithread score of 28662 demonstrate its capability in heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The single-core score of 3873 in PassMark and 3247 in Cinebench R23 also show solid performance in latency-sensitive applications like gaming, though the absence of a dedicated GPU is a limiting factor since the chip has no integrated graphics.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435GE has no benchmark wins, but its specification sheet points to advantages in other areas. The 35-watt TDP is significantly lower than the Intel chip's 65 watts, making it more suitable for small form factor systems, silent builds, or environments where power efficiency is prioritized. The 4nm TSMC process node is more advanced than Intel's 10nm node, which could contribute to better power efficiency per task. The integrated Radeon 840M graphics provide a built-in display output, eliminating the need for a separate graphics card in basic computing or media playback scenarios. The support for ECC memory also makes it a candidate for certain workstation or server applications where data integrity is critical. The unlocked multiplier on the AMD chip allows for overclocking, though any performance gains from this would need to be measured in real-world testing, which is absent from the database.