AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear divide between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G and the Intel Core 7 350. The Intel Core 7 350 holds a decisive advantage in every measured benchmark category, with no recorded wins for the AMD part. This outcome is largely predictable from their respective specifications, but the magnitude of the differences is substantial.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 7 350 scores 8030 points. This places it 31.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G, which records no score in this database. The single-core Cinebench R23 result shows a similar story: Intel scores 2046, while AMD has no recorded score. The pattern continues across the Cinebench R20 suite, where Intel posts 5373 multi-core and 758 single-core, and Cinebench R15, where Intel posts 1220 multi-core and 292 single-core. In every one of these tests, the AMD chip has no benchmark entry, meaning the Intel part wins all six head-to-head comparisons.

The Passmark suite reinforces this trend. The Intel Core 7 350 delivers 15170 in multithreaded tests and 4100 in single-threaded tests. For data compression, it scores 143123; for data encryption, 10933. Extended instructions yield 12045, floating point math scores 42809, integer math scores 33734, and physics tests produce 1173. Random string sorting reaches 17238, while finding prime numbers scores 107. Again, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G shows no benchmark results in any of these categories.

Because the AMD processor lacks recorded scores, the database indicates zero wins for it against the Intel part. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 17779 places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, whereas the AMD chip sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero. The Intel Core 7 350 also outperforms several nearby rivals, including the AMD EPYC 9374F by 0.5%, the Intel Core 5 221TE by 0.5%, and the Intel Core 5 120U by 0.7%. It trails only the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT by 0.6%, a margin that falls within typical run-to-run variance. These relative positions give context to the Intel chip's performance: it is not merely beating the AMD 435G, it is also competitive with server-class and previous-generation desktop parts, while the AMD chip's absence from the benchmark log leaves it without a comparable reference point.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 350, codenamed Wildcat Lake, belongs to the Core 5 generation and uses a 3 nm process fabricated by Intel itself. This node advantage for Intel is one factor behind its higher boost clock.

Core counts are identical at 6 physical cores, but thread counts diverge sharply. The AMD chip supports 12 threads through simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel chip offers only 6 threads, one per core. Despite this apparent disadvantage, the Intel part still wins all multi-threaded benchmarks because its per-core efficiency and clock speeds offset the lack of SMT. Base clocks differ as well: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.50 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the order, with Intel reaching 4.80 GHz versus AMD's 4.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies show distinct strategies. The AMD chip allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3. The Intel chip provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. Intel's larger L2 and L3 caches likely contribute to its superior single-thread performance, as more data can reside closer to the execution units. The AMD chip's smaller L3 means it relies more on SMT to fill execution slots, a tactic that fails to close the gap.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, plus ECC memory. Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth and no ECC. This is surprising: the AMD chip has nearly 50% more memory bandwidth, yet still loses all memory-sensitive benchmarks. The explanation lies in the Intel chip's higher boost clock and larger caches, which reduce reliance on main memory. PCIe connectivity favors AMD with Gen 4 and 10 lanes, versus Intel's Gen 4 and 6 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD chip targets the desktop segment with an AM5 socket, while Intel targets mobile with a BGA 1516 socket. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, whereas Intel locks the multiplier. Production status for both is active, with AMD releasing on February 28, 2026, and Intel on April 15, 2026. The Intel chip carries a launch MSRP of $469.

The Verdict

The data dictates a straightforward conclusion. The Intel Core 7 350 wins every recorded benchmark category against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G, and the AMD chip has no benchmark scores at all in the database. The Intel chip's 71st percentile ranking, average score of 17779, and competitive position against the AMD EPYC 9374F and Ryzen 5 3600XT indicate a well-rounded performer. The AMD chip's 50th percentile ranking with zero average score means it cannot be recommended for any workload where benchmark scores matter.

For users seeking maximum multi-threaded throughput, the Intel Core 7 350 delivers. For users prioritizing single-thread responsiveness, the Intel Core 7 350 delivers again. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G does offer advantages in memory bandwidth, PCIe lanes, ECC support, and an unlocked multiplier, but these features do not translate into any recorded performance wins. The Intel part's superior process node, larger caches, and higher boost clock prove more impactful in the measured results.

One caveat exists: the AMD chip's absence from benchmarks could reflect incomplete data collection rather than actual performance. However, based on what the database contains, the Intel Core 7 350 is the only defensible choice.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G | Intel Core 7 350 |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 12 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 10 Lanes | Gen 4, 6 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2026-04-15 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G has 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 350 have a higher boost clock than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G?

A: Yes. The Intel chip boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the AMD chip boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 350 does not.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 350 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It scores 0.5% above the AMD EPYC 9374F, 0.5% above the Intel Core 5 221TE, 0.7% above the Intel Core 5 120U, and 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT.

Q: Which chip has more memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G has 89.6 GB/s, compared to 59.7 GB/s for the Intel Core 7 350.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in all benchmark categories with recorded scores. This includes multi-core workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core (8030), R20 multi-core (5373), and R15 multi-core (1220). It also wins single-core tests: Cinebench R23 single-core (2046), R20 single-core (758), and R15 single-core (292). The Passmark suite shows Intel wins in multithread (15170), single-thread (4100), data compression (143123), data encryption (10933), extended instructions (12045), floating point math (42809), integer math (33734), physics (1173), random string sorting (17238), and prime number finding (107).

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. Its theoretical advantages include dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, ECC support, 10 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The Intel chip's advantages include a smaller 3 nm process, larger L1 and L2 caches, more L3 cache, a higher boost clock, and a much lower TDP of 15 W versus 65 W. For any workload measured in this database, the Intel Core 7 350 is the superior choice. The AMD chip's features may appeal to users who require ECC memory or extensive PCIe connectivity, but no benchmark evidence supports a performance win in any category.