AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a complete set of recorded measurements for the Intel Core 7 150U, but no corresponding benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G. The result is a one-sided comparison where every recorded score belongs to the Intel part. The Intel Core 7 150U achieves an average benchmark score of 17395, placing it at the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Ryzen AI 5 435G, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero, meaning no measured performance data exists for it at present.

The Intel Core 7 150U posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8883 and a single-core score of 1875.5. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 5248, while the single-core result is 740. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 1505.5 and a single-core score of 254. These results indicate a processor that scales well across rendering workloads, with the multi-core advantage growing as thread counts increase.

Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 6234 and a single-core score of 1857. The PassMark suite provides a broader view of workload-specific performance. Integer math scores reach 51057, floating point math reaches 34405, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 8748. Data compression scores 158622, data encryption scores 10025, and random string sorting scores 18269. Find prime numbers scores 58, physics scores 1012, and the multi-thread score is 14700. The single-thread PassMark score is 3508.

The nearest rivals in the database for the Intel Core 7 150U are all AMD parts. The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 scores 17333, which is 0.4% below the Intel chip. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 also scores 17321, another 0.4% gap. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scores 17482, putting it 0.5% above the Intel part, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 17507, 0.6% higher. These are tight margins, suggesting the Intel Core 7 150U sits in a crowded performance band where small percentage differences separate several AMD competitors.

The absence of any recorded benchmarks for the Ryzen AI 5 435G means no head-to-head wins can be awarded. The wins column shows zero for the AMD part and zero for the Intel part, reflecting a database that has not yet populated measurements for the newer AMD processor. The Intel Core 7 150U's scores stand alone, and any direct comparison between the two chips must rely on architectural characteristics rather than measured performance.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150U have a higher multi-core score than its nearest rivals?

A: Yes. The Intel Core 7 150U records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8883 and an average benchmark score of 17395. Its closest AMD rival, the Ryzen 5 4600G, averages 17507, which is 0.6% higher, so the Intel chip is slightly behind that particular rival but ahead of the Ryzen 5 4500 and Ryzen 3 210 by 0.4% each.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150U uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. This represents a significant manufacturing difference, with the AMD part built on a more advanced node.

Q: Which processor has more cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G has 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part also has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core compared to 1 MB per core for the AMD chip, while both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 150U supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel part.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G overclockable?

A: Yes. The multiplier is unlocked on the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G. The Intel Core 7 150U has a locked multiplier, meaning it does not support overclocking in the same manner.

Q: What is the release timing difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U carries a release date of January 2024, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G carries a release date of February 2026. The AMD part is the newer design, built on the Gorgon Point codename with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, while the Intel part uses Raptor Lake-U architecture.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G and Intel Core 7 150U represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD chip uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel chip uses the Raptor Lake codename with Raptor Lake-U architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel's own foundry.

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part has 10 cores and 12 threads. Both processors expose the same thread count, but the Intel chip achieves this with four additional physical cores. The AMD chip instead relies on simultaneous multithreading across fewer cores. This implies different scheduling behavior: the Intel part can dedicate more physical resources to parallel workloads, while the AMD part may rely more on its newer core architecture to compensate for the lower core count.

Clock speeds also diverge. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Intel chip boosts significantly higher, suggesting a performance advantage in lightly threaded scenarios where single-core frequency dominates. The AMD chip has a higher base clock, which could translate to more consistent sustained performance at lower load levels.

Cache hierarchies are markedly different. The AMD part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of total L3 cache. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has three times the L3 capacity, which can improve hit rates for working sets that exceed the smaller AMD cache.

Power characteristics show a stark contrast. The AMD part has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 15 watts. This places the AMD chip in a distinctly higher power envelope, suggesting it is designed for desktop use with active cooling, while the Intel chip targets mobile platforms where thermal constraints are tighter. The AMD chip also uses an AMD Socket AM5, whereas the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1744, a soldered mobile socket.

The AMD part integrates Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel part integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, the Intel chip does not. The AMD chip provides 10 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The AMD chip's memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s for DDR5, while no bandwidth figure exists for the Intel part's dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 support.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear asymmetry: the Intel Core 7 150U has a full set of benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G has none. From the available measurements, the Intel chip performs at the 71st percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 17395. Its nearest rivals, all AMD parts, sit within a 0.6% band, indicating that the Intel chip is competitive with but not dominant over comparable AMD silicon.

For users who need measured performance today, the Intel Core 7 150U is the only option with verified numbers. Its 12 MB of L3 cache, 10 cores, and 5.40 GHz boost clock give it architectural advantages in cache-sensitive and frequency-sensitive workloads. Its 15 watt TDP makes it suitable for power-constrained mobile designs.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G presents a different profile on paper. Its 4 nm process, Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, and 65 watt TDP suggest a desktop-oriented part that prioritizes raw throughput over efficiency. The unlocked multiplier and ECC memory support point toward a workstation or enthusiast positioning. But without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm how these architectural choices translate into measured performance.

The data implies that the Intel chip is the safer choice for any workload where validated scores matter. The AMD chip remains an unknown quantity until its benchmarks populate the database. The percentile gap, 71 versus 50, reflects the absence of AMD measurements rather than a measured performance deficit, and the AMD part could plausibly surpass the Intel chip once tested, given its newer core architecture and higher power envelope.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G | Intel Core 7 150U |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-U |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Raptor Lake-U) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | 10 (Gen 4) | 8 (Gen 4) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | February 2026 | January 2024 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150U wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8883 and single-core score of 1875.5 show strength in rendering workloads. Its PassMark integer math score of 51057 and floating point math score of 34405 indicate solid number-crunching capability. Data compression at 158622 and encryption at 10025 suggest the Intel chip handles data-intensive tasks efficiently. The 3508 single-thread PassMark score, combined with the 5.40 GHz boost clock, points to a processor that excels in lightly threaded applications.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G wins in architectural specifications that have no measured counterpart. Its 4 nm process node is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node, which generally implies better transistor density and power efficiency per operation. Its 65 watt TDP allows for higher sustained power delivery, which could benefit all-core workloads if the newer Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores scale well with additional power. The unlocked multiplier gives overclocking headroom that the Intel chip lacks. ECC memory support makes it suitable for error-sensitive computing environments. The higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s could help memory-bound workloads, assuming the rest of the chip can utilize that bandwidth.

The specification sheet favors the AMD part in process technology, memory bandwidth, ECC support, and overclocking freedom. The Intel part counters with more L3 cache, more cores, a higher boost clock, and a much lower power envelope. The mobile versus desktop market segmentation reinforces the intended use cases: the Intel chip for thin-and-light laptops, the AMD chip for desktop systems where power draw is less constrained. Until the database records benchmarks for the AMD processor, the Intel Core 7 150U remains the only chip in this pairing with quantifiable performance, and its 71st percentile standing shows it competes closely with several AMD alternatives. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435G holds promise on paper, but the data cannot yet confirm whether that promise becomes reality.