AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Intel Core i5-13420H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 and Intel Core i5-13420H are both mobile processors aimed at thin-and-light laptops, but benchmark data reveals two very different performance profiles. The Intel part wins the majority of head-to-head tests by significant margins, leveraging a higher core count and higher power envelope, while the AMD chip counters with a narrower but consistent lead in single-threaded workloads. The data shows a clear division: Intel dominates heavily threaded tasks, while AMD claims the single-core crown with notable efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-13420H takes an overwhelming 12 of the 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, with its largest victories coming in multi-threaded and math-heavy workloads. In Cinebench R23 multicore, Intel scores 11084 against AMD’s 7840, a 29.3% advantage. The gap widens further in PassMark’s floating-point math test, where Intel’s 42806 result tops AMD’s 26196 by 38.8%. Integer math tells a similar story: Intel’s 58156 beats AMD’s 37771 by 35.1%. Data encryption also favors Intel decisively, with a score of 11559 versus 7251, a 37.3% margin.

The older Cinebench R15 test shows an even larger spread. Intel’s multicore score of 1738 is 31.5% ahead of AMD’s 1191, while the single-core score of 238 beats AMD’s 199.9 by 16%. PassMark’s multithread test reinforces the pattern: Intel scores 17475 against AMD’s 12797, a 26.8% lead. Physics simulation, often indicative of gaming and rendering performance, also goes to Intel by 30.3% (1012 vs 705). Data compression and random string sorting follow suit, with Intel ahead by 27.4% and 26.6%, respectively.

AMD’s wins are fewer but meaningful. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD’s 1812 beats Intel’s 1689 by 7.3%. PassMark’s single-thread test shows AMD ahead by 3.5%, scoring 3515 versus 3396. Both of these are the only bright spots in an otherwise Intel-dominated chart. The data suggests AMD’s Zen 5 architecture delivers superior instructions-per-clock, but the Intel chip’s two extra cores and higher thread count overwhelm that advantage in almost every parallel workload.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 uses TSMC’s 4 nm process node with a Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Krackan Point 2, and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation. It features 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel Core i5-13420H, by contrast, is a Raptor Lake-H part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, featuring 8 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel chip has a higher TDP of 45 watts versus AMD’s 28 watts, explaining its sustained multi-threaded performance advantage.

Cache configurations differ substantially. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 per core, but Intel doubles the L2 cache to 2 MB per core versus AMD’s 1 MB. The L3 cache is a more significant divergence: Intel provides 12 MB shared L3, while AMD offers only 4 MB. This larger cache pool likely contributes to Intel’s strength in data-heavy workloads like compression and encryption. Memory support also diverges: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus delivering 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 without a stated bandwidth figure.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are another differentiator: AMD pairs the CPU with a Radeon 820M, while Intel includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. Both are mobile parts, with AMD using the FP8 socket and Intel using BGA 1744. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both lack ECC memory support. Production status is active for both, with Intel releasing earlier on 2023-01-03 and AMD following on 2025-07-15.

Where Each One Wins

Intel’s strengths are unmistakable in multi-threaded productivity. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11084 makes it the clear choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, and batch processing. PassMark’s multithread score of 17475 reinforces this, suggesting strong performance in compilation, scientific computing, and virtual machines. The 35.1% lead in integer math and 38.8% lead in floating-point math point to advantages in financial modeling, simulation, and engineering software. Data encryption results (11559 vs 7251) indicate Intel is better suited for security-focused tasks like VPNs or disk encryption. The 30.3% physics score lead also suggests better gaming performance in CPU-bound scenarios.

AMD’s wins are concentrated in single-threaded tasks. The 7.3% Cinebench R23 single-core lead and 3.5% PassMark single-thread lead mean faster response in everyday applications like web browsing, office documents, and lightweight coding. The Zen 5 architecture’s efficiency at lower power (28W TDP) also makes it attractive for fanless or passively cooled designs. For users who prioritize burst performance over sustained multi-core output, the Ryzen AI 5 330 delivers competitive responsiveness with less heat generation. The single-thread wins also translate to faster legacy application performance that relies on one or two cores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-13420H wins decisively. It scores 11084 in Cinebench R23 multicore versus AMD’s 7840, a 29.3% advantage. PassMark multithread shows 17475 versus 12797, a 26.8% lead.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins three tests. It leads by 7.3% in Cinebench R23 single-core (1812 vs 1689) and by 3.5% in PassMark single-thread (3515 vs 3396), with the third win being a duplicate of that single-thread result.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel part has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD part has 4 cores and 8 threads. Intel’s higher core and thread count is the primary driver of its multi-threaded dominance.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: Intel’s TDP is 45 watts, while AMD’s is 28 watts. This 17-watt gap explains why Intel can sustain higher multi-core clocks, while AMD operates more efficiently.

Q: Which processor has better integrated graphics?

A: Intel includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while AMD uses a Radeon 820M. The data does not include benchmark scores for either iGPU, so direct comparison is not possible from this dataset.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both have an active production status. Intel released on 2023-01-03, and AMD followed on 2025-07-15.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 | Intel Core i5-13420H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 8 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Krackan Point 2 | Raptor Lake-H |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake-H) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not specified |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 820M | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |

| Part Number | 100-000001897 | SRMHX |