AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 and Intel Core i3-14100F are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, but they target fundamentally different platforms. The benchmark data shows a clear split: the Intel part dominates nearly every performance metric, while the AMD chip counters with a significant single-core win in one test and a far more power-efficient design. The Core i3-14100F is the performance pick for desktop builds, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 is the mobile-focused alternative with a superior architectural foundation and integrated graphics.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive victory for the Intel Core i3-14100F in raw performance. Out of 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, the Intel chip wins 14, with margins ranging from a narrow 1.9% in Cinebench R23 single-core to a massive 40.1% in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The Core i3-14100F also holds a slight edge in the average benchmark score, posting 18,519 versus the Ryzen AI 5 330's 18,811, though the AMD chip actually has a marginally higher percentile ranking (73rd vs 72nd). This suggests the AMD part is slightly more competitive against the broader CPU landscape, but the Intel chip is simply faster in these direct comparisons.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is the logical choice for systems where power consumption and platform features matter more than peak throughput. Its 28W TDP is less than half of the Intel's 58W, making it far better suited for thin-and-light laptops. It also includes a Radeon 820M integrated GPU, whereas the Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics at all, meaning it requires a discrete GPU to output video. The AMD chip wins only one head-to-head test — Cinebench R15 single-core, with a 7.5% advantage — but that single win highlights its architectural efficiency in legacy single-threaded workloads.

The Intel Core i3-14100F is the straightforward recommendation for budget desktop builders who already have a discrete GPU and prioritize multi-core performance. Its 40.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 17% lead in PassMark multithread are too large to ignore. However, the Ryzen AI 5 330 is the better choice for mobile users or anyone seeking an energy-efficient platform with built-in graphics, provided they can accept lower multi-core scores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 18,519, compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330's 18,811. The difference is small, but the Intel chip edges ahead in this aggregate metric.

Q: What is the most significant performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel Core i3-14100F scores 13,084 versus the AMD's 7,840, a 40.1% difference. This is the biggest margin in any test.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any advantages in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 wins Cinebench R15 single-core with a score of 199.9, beating the Intel's 186 by 7.5%. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel chip wins by 1.9%, so the AMD advantage is not consistent across all single-threaded tests.

Q: Which processor is more power-efficient?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 has a TDP of 28W, which is significantly lower than the Intel Core i3-14100F's 58W. This indicates the AMD chip is designed for much lower power consumption.

Q: Do these processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes for the AMD, no for the Intel. The Ryzen AI 5 330 includes a Radeon 820M integrated GPU, while the Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics (N/A), requiring a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F was released on January 7, 2024, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 arrived later, on July 15, 2025.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is built on TSMC's 4nm process node, utilizing the Zen 5 architecture under the codename "Krackan Point 2." It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which notably uses a hybrid design of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i3-14100F, by contrast, uses Intel's 10nm process node (often referred to as Intel 7) and is based on the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename "Raptor Lake-R," part of the Core 14th Gen series.

Both chips have 4 cores and 8 threads, but their cache hierarchies differ. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core but a larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache is where the difference becomes stark: the AMD has only 4 MB of L3 cache, whereas the Intel has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This threefold L3 advantage is a major contributor to the Intel's superior multi-core performance.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is listed. The AMD chip does not support ECC memory, while the Intel chip does. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD offers Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Intel offers the newer Gen 5 standard with 16 CPU lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 | Intel Core i3-14100F |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28W | 58W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Support | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 820M | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-07-15 | 2024-01-07 |

| Die Size | Not listed | 163 mm² |

The Intel chip has higher base and boost clocks, a larger L3 cache, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC. The AMD chip counters with a much lower TDP, a smaller process node, integrated graphics, and a higher memory bandwidth. The Intel chip also has a die size of 163 mm², while the AMD's die size is not listed. The AMD's launch MSRP is not available, while the Intel's is $109.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-14100F wins the vast majority of tests, often by substantial margins. The most dramatic victory is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel scores 13,084 versus the AMD's 7,840, a 40.1% lead. This is a massive gap that indicates the Intel chip is far more capable in heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark physics test shows a similar trend, with the Intel scoring 1,077 against the AMD's 705, a 34.5% advantage. Prime number finding also heavily favors Intel, with a score of 61 versus 42, a 31.1% lead.

In floating-point math, the Intel chip scores 35,370 compared to the AMD's 26,196, a 25.9% difference. Data encryption shows an 18.7% lead for Intel (8,922 vs 7,251), and integer math favors Intel by 16.7% (45,357 vs 37,771). The PassMark multithread test shows a 17% advantage for Intel (15,420 vs 12,797). Data compression, random string sorting, and extended instructions all show Intel leads of 13.7%, 8%, and 7.2%, respectively.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330's sole victory comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 199.9 against the Intel's 186, a 7.5% win. This is an interesting result because the newer Cinebench R23 single-core test shows the Intel chip winning by 1.9% (1,847 vs 1,812). The PassMark single-thread test also favors Intel, with a score of 3,778 versus the AMD's 3,515, a 7% difference. This inconsistency suggests the AMD chip's architectural efficiency shines in older, less demanding single-threaded tests, but the Intel chip's higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz (versus 4.50 GHz) gives it the edge in more modern workloads.

The data leaves no ambiguity about which processor is faster overall. The Intel Core i3-14100F is the performance leader, winning 14 of 15 benchmarks with an average score of 18,519. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is the efficiency and feature leader, with a 28W TDP, integrated graphics, and a 7.5% single-core win in Cinebench R15. The choice comes down to whether raw performance or platform efficiency is the priority.