AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Intel Core i3-13100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 1812 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is 7.1% ahead of the Intel Core i3-13100's 1692. The AMD also leads in Cinebench R15 single-core with a 17.6% margin (199.9 versus 170).

Q: How does the Intel chip dominate in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100 wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by a substantial 34.6%, scoring 11986 versus 7840. It also edges out the AMD in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 1208 to 1191, a 1.4% difference.

Q: What is the overall benchmark win count between the two?

A: The Intel Core i3-13100 wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 wins 6. The Intel's victories are often by larger margins, particularly in multi-threaded tests.

Q: How do they compare in the PassMark single-thread test?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 records a score of 3515, which is 1.6% above the Intel Core i3-13100's 3460. This is a narrow but consistent lead for the AMD in single-threaded PassMark tasks.

Q: What is the difference in their TDP ratings?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i3-13100 has a TDP of 60 watts. This indicates a significant difference in power envelope between the two.

Q: Which processor has the higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 sits at the 73rd percentile, while the Intel Core i3-13100 is at the 72nd percentile. The AMD also has a higher average benchmark score of 18811 compared to the Intel's 18380.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 and Intel Core i3-13100 represent fundamentally different design philosophies and target markets. The AMD chip is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node using the Zen 5 architecture, with the codename "Krackan Point 2" and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation. The Intel part uses Intel's 10 nm process with the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, and is part of the Core 13th Gen series.

Both processors have 4 cores and 8 threads, but their cache hierarchies diverge. The AMD chip features 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a total of 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core but a larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core and a substantially larger 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This difference in L3 cache capacity can influence performance in workloads that benefit from larger shared pools of data.

The memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-13100 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for it. This makes the AMD more flexible for lower-power mobile implementations, while the Intel retains backwards compatibility with DDR4.

PCIe connectivity shows a generation gap. The AMD processor offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel's newer PCIe generation allows for higher potential bandwidth to compatible devices.

The integrated graphics are also distinct: the AMD uses a Radeon 820M, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The physical sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip is a mobile-market part, whereas the Intel is a desktop-market part. The AMD has a TDP of 28 watts, reflecting its mobile focus, compared to the Intel's 60 watts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split between single-thread and multi-thread performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 takes the single-core crowns, while the Intel Core i3-13100 flexes its muscle in multi-core and math-heavy tests.

The most dramatic difference appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the Intel leads by 34.6%, scoring 11986 against the AMD's 7840. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test tells a different story, with the Intel winning by only 1.4% (1208 versus 1191), a much tighter margin.

In single-core tests, the AMD is consistently ahead. Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 17.6% advantage for the AMD (199.9 versus 170), while Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 7.1% lead (1812 versus 1692). The PassMark single-thread test also favors the AMD, but by a smaller 1.6% margin (3515 versus 3460).

The PassMark suite reveals Intel's strength in compute-heavy tasks. The Intel wins floating-point math by 19% (32325 versus 26196), integer math by 8.6% (41313 versus 37771), and prime number finding by 19.2% (52 versus 42). Data compression also goes to Intel by 5.8% (161424 versus 152012), and data encryption by 9.9% (8049 versus 7251).

The AMD does secure wins in a few PassMark subtests. It leads in extended instructions by 0.6% (11124 versus 11053) and in random string sorting by 1.7% (16188 versus 15925). The PassMark physics test goes to Intel by 19% (870 versus 705), and the multithread test shows an Intel lead of 6.8% (13726 versus 12797).

The overall score distribution shows that the Intel wins more tests and often by wider margins, particularly in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the math workloads. The AMD's wins are concentrated in single-thread and specific memory-oriented tasks like string sorting.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion for different use cases. The Intel Core i3-13100 is the stronger performer in multi-threaded and compute-intensive applications, with a decisive 34.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and consistent wins across PassMark math tests. Its 9 wins out of 15 head-to-head benchmarks, combined with the larger average margins on those wins, make it the better choice for rendering, data processing, and number-crunching workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330, however, holds the edge in single-thread performance, with a 17.6% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core and a 7.1% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core. It also edges out the Intel in PassMark single-thread and random string sorting. This makes it attractive for lightly-threaded applications where single-core speed is paramount.

The power envelope is a major differentiator. The AMD's 28-watt TDP versus the Intel's 60-watt TDP suggests the AMD is designed for efficiency and mobile use, while the Intel targets desktop performance without the same power constraints. The AMD's higher average benchmark score of 18811 versus 18380, and its 73rd percentile ranking versus the Intel's 72nd, indicate that overall the AMD is slightly more competitive in the broader CPU landscape despite losing the head-to-head.

For users prioritizing raw multi-core throughput and desktop compute, the Intel Core i3-13100 is the data-backed winner. For those needing strong single-core performance in a lower-power mobile package, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 is the logical pick.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 | Intel Core i3-13100 |

|---|---|---|

| Series | null | Core 13th Gen |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 60 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Krackan Point 2 | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i3 (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | null | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-07-15 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | null | $134 |

| Part Number | 100-000001897 | SRMBU |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-13100 is the decisive winner in multi-core and math-heavy workloads. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows the largest gap at 34.6%, making the Intel the clear choice for video rendering, 3D modeling, and any application that scales across all cores. The PassMark data reinforces this: floating-point math (19% lead), integer math (8.6% lead), prime number finding (19.2% lead), and physics (19% lead). Data compression and encryption also favor the Intel by 5.8% and 9.9% respectively. For users running heavy productivity suites, scientific simulations, or content creation tools, the Intel's multi-threaded advantage is substantial.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 wins in single-thread and specific memory-oriented tasks. The Cinebench R15 single-core margin of 17.6% is the AMD's largest win, followed by a 7.1% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core. PassMark single-thread shows a 1.6% advantage, and random string sorting goes to the AMD by 1.7%. Extended instructions also favor the AMD, albeit narrowly at 0.6%. These results suggest the AMD is well-suited for older or lightly-threaded applications, spreadsheet tasks, and workloads that rely on rapid single-thread responsiveness. Its lower TDP of 28 watts also makes it the more efficient option for mobile devices where thermal and power budgets are tight.