AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 225T

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 10 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,536
2,214
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
357
312
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
10,569
9,227
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,491
1,302
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
25,165
21,971
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,552
3,101
passmark_data_compression
368,884
233,998
passmark_data_encryption
21,820
18,289
passmark_extended_instructions
27,714
20,083
passmark_find_prime_numbers
91
284
passmark_floating_point_math
63,490
82,751
passmark_integer_math
103,390
59,543
passmark_multithread
30,378
25,358
passmark_physics
1,430
2,053
passmark_random_string_sorting
44,668
28,774
passmark_single_thread
3,920
4,348
passmark_singlethread
3,920
4,348

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive overall victory for the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T. The AMD processor's most dominant margin comes in the PassMark integer math test, where it scores 103,390 against Intel's 59,543, a 73.6% advantage. This is followed closely by data compression, where AMD's 368,884 score is 57.6% higher than Intel's 233,998. The AMD chip also shows a 55.2% lead in random string sorting, with 44,668 versus 28,774.

In the Cinebench suite, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS demonstrates consistent superiority across every version. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, AMD scores 25,165 versus Intel's 21,971, a 14.5% lead. The same 14.5% delta appears in Cinebench R20 multi-core (10,569 vs 9,227) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (2,536 vs 2,214). Single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern: R23 single-core shows 3,552 versus 3,101 (14.5%), R20 single-core shows 1,491 versus 1,302 (14.5%), and R15 single-core shows 357 versus 312 (14.4%).

The AMD processor also wins PassMark multi-thread with 30,378 versus 25,358 (19.8%), data encryption with 21,820 versus 18,289 (19.3%), and extended instructions with 27,714 versus 20,083 (38.0%).

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T claims five wins, and its largest margin is in prime number finding, where it scores 284 versus AMD's 91, a 68% advantage. Intel also leads in floating point math with 82,751 versus 63,490 (23.3% ahead) and in physics with 2,053 versus 1,430 (30.3% ahead). In single-thread performance, Intel shows 4,348 versus AMD's 3,920, a 9.8% lead, which is the closest margin among the Intel victories.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, leveraging simultaneous multithreading. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake architecture with the Arrow Lake-S codename, built on a 3 nm process also at TSMC, but it offers 10 cores and 10 threads with no multithreading.

The transistor counts diverge significantly. AMD's chip contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, while Intel's contains 17,800 million transistors on a larger 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchies also differ. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel allocates 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3.

Clock speeds show AMD with the higher peak. The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Core Ultra 5 225T has a base of 2.50 GHz and a boost of 4.90 GHz. The TDP figures move in the opposite direction: AMD is rated at 45 W, while Intel is rated at 65 W.

Memory and I/O capabilities differ as well. Both support DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, but AMD offers 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth and ECC memory support, while Intel offers 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth and no ECC support. For PCIe, AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are the Radeon 780M for AMD and the Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU for Intel.

The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket FP7, while Intel uses Socket 1851. AMD's market segment is mobile, while Intel's is desktop. AMD released on 2024-04-15, while Intel's release date is 2024-12-31.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the clear choice for workloads that rely on integer arithmetic and data manipulation. Its 73.6% lead in integer math indicates strong general-purpose compute throughput. The 57.6% advantage in data compression and 55.2% lead in random string sorting suggest it handles memory-intensive data processing tasks with greater efficiency. The 19.8% multi-thread win and 19.3% encryption win reinforce this pattern. The Cinebench results, all showing approximately 14.5% advantages, indicate that AMD has a consistent edge in rendering and CPU-bound content creation with its 16 threads versus Intel's 10.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins in specific compute patterns. The 68% lead in prime number finding points to superior branch prediction and single-thread integer loops. The 30.3% win in physics tests suggests its architecture handles certain simulation workloads better. The 23.3% lead in floating point math shows Intel's advantage in scientific and engineering calculations. The 9.8% single-thread lead, while modest, indicates that Intel has the faster individual core for lightly threaded applications.

The percentile rankings place AMD at 88 percent versus all CPUs, while Intel sits at 82 percent. The average benchmark scores confirm the gap: AMD's average is 41,963, while Intel's is 30,468. The nearest rivals for AMD include the Intel Core i7-14700T with an average score of 41,914 (0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 at 42,055 (-0.2% delta). For Intel, the nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-11980HK at 30,422 (0.2% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS at 30,390 (0.3% delta).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T boosts to 4.90 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T does not support ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS does.

Q: How many threads does each processor handle?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 16 MB on the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T provides 102.4 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS provides 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has an average benchmark score of 41,963, compared to 30,468 for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads. AMD's base clock is 4.00 GHz versus Intel's 2.50 GHz, and AMD's boost clock is 5.20 GHz versus Intel's 4.90 GHz. The TDP is 45 W for AMD and 65 W for Intel.

The process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 3 nm. Transistor counts are 25,000 million for AMD and 17,800 million for Intel. Die sizes are 178 mm² for AMD and 243 mm² for Intel. The cache layouts differ in every level: L1 is 64 KB per core for AMD versus 192 KB per core for Intel, L2 is 1 MB per core for AMD versus 3 MB per core for Intel, and L3 is 16 MB shared for AMD versus 20 MB shared for Intel.

Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 102.4 GB/s for Intel. ECC support is present on AMD but absent on Intel. PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for AMD, Gen 5 for Intel, both with 20 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 780M for AMD and Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU for Intel. The market segment is Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1851. Release dates are 2024-04-15 for AMD and 2024-12-31 for Intel.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 PRO 8945HS
Ultra 5 225T
Core Specs
Cores
8
10 +25.0%
Threads
16
10 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
4
2.5 -37.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.9 -5.8%
Frequency (GHz)
4
2.5 -37.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.9 -5.8%
Multiplier
40
25 -37.5%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
65 +44.4%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
114 W
Configurable TDP
35-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Arrow Lake
Codename
Hawk Point
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Transistors
25,000 million
17,800 million
Die Size
178 mm²
243 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
—
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
—
1900 MHz up to 4.4 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 16 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 780M
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001314(FP7r2),100-000001386(FP7)
unknown
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS Details View Core Ultra 5 225T Details