AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and Intel Core 7 253PE are two very different processors that land in a similar performance bracket. The AMD chip is a mobile-focused 8-core part built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel chip is a desktop-oriented 10-core part on Intel's 10 nm node. Despite their differences, the recorded data shows they trade blows across the benchmark suite, with the AMD winning 11 of the 17 head-to-head tests and the Intel taking 6. The overall average benchmark score for the AMD is 41963, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel averages 40557, sitting in the 87th percentile. This is a close matchup that comes down to workload specifics rather than a clear overall victor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the clear winner in memory-sensitive and encryption-heavy tasks. Its biggest margin comes in random string sorting, where it scores 44668 against the Intel's 32777, a 36.3% advantage. Data compression also favors the AMD heavily, with a score of 368884 versus 339133, an 8.8% lead. The encryption workload shows an even larger gap: the AMD scores 21820 while the Intel manages only 18385, a 18.7% difference. Extended instructions also go to the AMD, with a score of 27714 compared to 21806, a 27.1% margin. These results indicate the AMD's architecture handles data manipulation and security-related workloads with significantly more efficiency.

The Intel Core 7 253PE, on the other hand, dominates raw compute and physics simulations. The most dramatic difference is in the find prime numbers test, where the Intel scores 138 against the AMD's 91, a 34.1% advantage. Floating point math also goes decisively to the Intel, with a score of 80870 versus 63490, a 21.5% lead. The physics benchmark shows the Intel at 1845 compared to the AMD's 1430, a 22.5% gap. Integer math is closer but still favors the Intel, with a score of 114158 versus 103390, a 9.4% edge. These numbers suggest the Intel's higher core count and different execution resources give it an edge in sustained mathematical throughput.

In the Cinebench suite, the AMD wins every single test, but by very narrow margins. The multicore results show the AMD ahead by 1.2% in R15 (2536 vs 2507), 1.1% in R20 (10569 vs 10449), and 1.1% in R23 (25165 vs 24880). Single-core results follow the same pattern, with the AMD ahead by 0.8% in R15 (357 vs 354) and 1.1% in both R20 (1491 vs 1475) and R23 (3552 vs 3512). The overall PassMark multithread test also goes to the AMD, with a score of 30378 versus 29271, a 3.8% edge. The single-thread PassMark test goes the other way, with the Intel scoring 3955 versus 3920, a 0.9% difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 25,000 million transistors into a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

Core configurations differ significantly. The AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel has 10 cores and 20 threads. This gives the Intel a 25% advantage in core count and thread count. The cache hierarchy also diverges. The AMD has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 33 MB of shared L3. The larger L3 on the Intel could help in certain workloads, though the benchmark data shows the AMD still wins in most memory-intensive tests.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The AMD has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel has a lower base clock of 2.50 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The AMD's higher base clock likely helps in sustained workloads, while the Intel's higher boost clock gives it a peak advantage. Power consumption also differs, with the AMD rated at 45W TDP and the Intel at 65W TDP.

Memory support and platform connectivity are additional differentiators. The AMD supports DDR5 only with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with the same 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe implementation differs: the AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD uses the FP7 socket, while the Intel uses Socket 1700. The integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD featuring the Radeon 780M and the Intel using UHD Graphics 730.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The AMD scores 25165 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is 1.1% ahead of the Intel's 24880.

Q: Which processor is better for encryption workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is significantly better, scoring 21820 in the data encryption test compared to the Intel's 18385, an 18.7% advantage.

Q: Does the Intel chip have a larger cache?

A: Yes, the Intel has 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 per core, while the AMD has 16 MB of shared L3 and 1 MB of L2 per core.

Q: What is the production status of both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and the Intel Core 7 253PE are listed as Active in production.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS | Intel Core 7 253PE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 45W | 65W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest win for the AMD comes in random string sorting, where it scores 44668 versus the Intel's 32777, a massive 36.3% delta. This workload involves frequent memory access and pointer chasing, and the AMD's architecture handles it far more efficiently. Data encryption shows an 18.7% gap in the AMD's favor, with scores of 21820 and 18385. Extended instructions, which test SIMD and specialized instruction sets, go to the AMD by 27.1%, with scores of 27714 and 21806. The PassMark multithread test also favors the AMD, with a score of 30378 against 29271, a 3.8% margin.

The Intel's largest victory is in the find prime numbers test, where it scores 138 against the AMD's 91, a 34.1% advantage. This test is heavily dependent on integer division and loop performance, which the Intel's higher core count and different execution units handle better. Floating point math goes to the Intel by 21.5%, with scores of 80870 and 63490. The physics benchmark, which simulates rigid body dynamics, favors the Intel at 1845 versus 1430, a 22.5% delta. Integer math is closer, with the Intel at 114158 versus 103390, a 9.4% advantage. The single-thread PassMark test shows the Intel ahead by a slim 0.9%, with scores of 3955 and 3920.

The Cinebench results are uniformly close, with the AMD winning every test by roughly 1%. The R15 multicore test shows a 1.2% gap (2536 vs 2507), while R20 and R23 multicore show 1.1% gaps (10569 vs 10449 and 25165 vs 24880 respectively). Single-core Cinebench results follow the same pattern, with the AMD ahead by 0.8% in R15 and 1.1% in both R20 and R23. These margins are small enough to be within run-to-run variance, but the consistency across all six Cinebench tests suggests a slight architectural advantage for the AMD in this rendering workload.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the better choice for data-centric workloads, while the Intel Core 7 253PE excels in raw computational tasks. The AMD's wins in data compression, encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting make it the stronger option for database work, file archiving, and security-related applications. Its 36.3% lead in random string sorting is particularly notable, as this workload is common in sorting algorithms and data processing pipelines.

The Intel Core 7 253PE, with its 10 cores and 20 threads, is the better pick for physics simulations, prime number calculations, and floating-point-heavy scientific computing. Its 34.1% advantage in prime finding and 21.5% lead in floating point math demonstrate a clear edge in number-crunching tasks. The higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz also gives it a slight edge in single-threaded PassMark performance, though by only 0.9%.

For users who prioritize rendering performance, the AMD wins every Cinebench test, but the margins are so small that they are unlikely to be noticeable in real-world use. The AMD's lower power consumption, at 45W versus 65W, makes it a more efficient choice for sustained workloads, especially in mobile platforms. The Intel, being a desktop part, has a launch MSRP of $384 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which could be relevant for platform compatibility.

Ultimately, the choice depends on the workload mix. The AMD is the better all-around performer in the majority of tested scenarios, winning 11 out of 17 benchmarks. The Intel is the specialist for compute-heavy tasks that benefit from more cores and higher peak clocks. Neither processor is a clear winner for general use, but the AMD's broader set of wins and higher average benchmark score of 41963 make it the safer recommendation for a mixed workload environment.