AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a complete set of recorded scores for the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark entries. This absence of data for the Intel part shapes the entire comparison. The AMD processor's average benchmark score of 41,963 places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, a strong position that reflects consistent performance across the tested workloads.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,165 and a single-core score of 3,552. In Cinebench R20, the same processor records 10,569 multi-core and 1,491 single-core. The R15 results show 2,536 multi-core and 357 single-core. These scores represent the full extent of the head-to-head data available; no comparable Intel figures exist in the database.

The PassMark suite adds further detail for the AMD part. The multi-thread score of 30,378 and single-thread score of 3,920 indicate strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. Integer math reaches 103,390, while floating-point math hits 63,490. The extended instructions score of 27,714 suggests solid SIMD performance, and the data compression score of 368,884 shows efficient handling of compression workloads. Data encryption records 21,820, random string sorting 44,668, and physics 1,430. Prime number finding scores 91.

Without any Intel Core 3 201TE benchmark scores, the database cannot compute win counts for either processor. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both winsA and winsB stand at zero. The comparison therefore rests on architectural specifications and what the AMD data implies about relative capability given the Intel part's known position in the overall distribution.

The Intel Core 3 201TE does carry a percentile ranking of 50, placing it at the median of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS sits at the 88th percentile, a gap of 38 percentile points. This percentile differential suggests a substantial performance advantage for the AMD part, though the absence of direct benchmark scores for the Intel processor prevents precise quantification.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference alone, 4 nm versus 10 nm, indicates a significant manufacturing advantage for AMD in terms of density and potential efficiency.

Core counts differ sharply. The AMD part provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part offers 4 cores and 8 threads. This doubles the parallel execution capacity of the AMD processor in both core and thread counts. Clock speeds follow a similar pattern: the AMD base clock is 4.00 GHz with a boost of 5.20 GHz, whereas the Intel base clock is 2.90 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz. The AMD part holds a 1.10 GHz advantage at base and a 0.60 GHz advantage at boost.

Cache hierarchies reflect the different core configurations. The AMD processor allocates 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Per-core L1 and L2 allocations are larger on the Intel side, but the total L3 pool is smaller by 4 MB. The AMD die measures 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors; the Intel die measures 163 mm² with no transistor count recorded in the database.

Memory support separates the two as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with a bandwidth rating of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The AMD memory bandwidth exceeds the Intel figure by 12.8 GB/s. PCIe connectivity differs by generation: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ substantially. The AMD processor includes the Radeon 780M, a high-end integrated GPU. The Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 730, a more modest solution. The market segments also differ: AMD targets mobile with an FP7 socket, while Intel targets desktop with Socket 1700. Release dates show the AMD part launching on 2024-04-15 and the Intel part on 2025-01-12, a gap of roughly nine months.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, with its 88th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 41,963, occupies a performance tier far above the Intel Core 3 201TE's 50th percentile median position. The nearest rivals to the AMD part in the database confirm its competitive standing: the Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41,914 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42,055 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41,779 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41,650 (0.8% behind). These deltas are all within one percent, indicating the AMD processor competes directly with strong mid-range desktop and mobile parts.

For users selecting between these two processors, the choice depends on workload requirements. The AMD part doubles the core count, offers higher clocks, faster memory bandwidth, a more advanced process node, and a newer generation of integrated graphics. The Intel part counters with newer PCIe Gen 5 support, dual memory type compatibility, and a smaller die size. The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $134, which the database records without further pricing analysis.

Benchmark results indicate the AMD processor excels in multi-threaded and single-threaded performance alike, given its Cinebench and PassMark scores. The Intel processor, lacking recorded benchmarks, cannot demonstrate any performance advantage in the database. The 88th versus 50th percentile gap strongly implies the AMD part is the higher-performance choice across most workloads.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS | Intel Core 3 201TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 4.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Not recorded |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 12 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $134 |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare?

A: The AMD processor has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 only. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has the higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD processor ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel processor ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the database contain any benchmark scores for the Intel Core 3 201TE?

A: No, the Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD processor has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS wins in every workload category represented in the benchmark database, though this conclusion follows from the absence of Intel data rather than direct comparison. The recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,165 and single-core score of 3,552 place the AMD part well above the median CPU. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30,378 and single-thread score of 3,920 reinforce this position.

For multi-core rendering, video encoding, and compilation workloads, the AMD processor's 8 cores and 16 threads provide clear structural advantages. The 5.20 GHz boost clock supports responsive single-threaded performance in applications that rely on one or two threads. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics handle graphical workloads without a discrete GPU, a capability the Intel UHD Graphics 730 cannot match based on the specification data.

The Intel Core 3 201TE holds advantages in areas unrelated to raw benchmark performance. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes offers newer connectivity for compatible devices. Dual memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility in platform design. The smaller die size of 163 mm² compares favorably to the AMD's 178 mm². The desktop market segment and Socket 1700 platform target a different usage context than the AMD mobile part.

The 50th percentile ranking for the Intel processor indicates it performs at the median level of all CPUs, which suggests adequate capability for typical desktop tasks. However, the database contains no direct measurements to confirm specific workload performance. The AMD processor's 88th percentile and complete benchmark set demonstrate verified high performance across compression, encryption, math, sorting, and rendering workloads.