AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and the Intel Core 3 201E occupy very different positions in the processor landscape, and the recorded benchmark data reflects that clearly. The AMD part, a mobile-focused 8-core processor from the 8000 series, holds a dominant lead across every single measured test, while the Intel chip, a desktop-oriented 4-core part from the Bartlett Lake family, trails by substantial margins in nearly all workloads. The data shows a sweep: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons, with the Intel Core 3 201E recording zero victories.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic gaps appear in the PassMark suite, where the AMD processor’s extra cores and threads translate into massive percentage leads. In data encryption, the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 21,820 against the Core 3 201E’s 8,931, a delta of 144.3%. Extended instructions show a 151.1% advantage, with scores of 27,714 versus 11,035. Random string sorting, a test that often scales with memory bandwidth and cache efficiency, also shows a 151.2% delta, as the AMD part posts 44,668 compared to Intel’s 17,783. Integer math, a strong indicator of raw compute throughput, favors the AMD chip by 135.5%, with 103,390 against 43,894.

The Cinebench tests, which are widely used for rendering and CPU stress, paint a similar picture. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 25,165, while the Core 3 201E manages 12,613, a 99.5% delta. The single-core R23 result is closer in relative terms but still decisive: 3,552 versus 1,780, a 99.6% delta. The pattern holds across older Cinebench versions as well. R20 multi-core shows 10,569 against 5,297 (99.5% delta), and R15 multi-core shows 2,536 versus 1,271 (99.5% delta). Single-core results in R20 and R15 follow the same trend, with deltas of 99.6% and 99.4%, respectively.

The smallest relative gap in the entire dataset appears in PassMark single-thread performance, where the AMD part scores 3,920 and the Intel part scores 3,482, a 12.6% delta. This is the only test where the Intel chip comes within shouting distance, suggesting that its single-core architecture is somewhat competitive even with fewer resources. However, the gap widens again in PassMark physics, where the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS leads by 25.3%, scoring 1,430 against 1,141. Floating point math shows a 90.9% delta, with 63,490 versus 33,260, and data compression shows a 124.7% delta, with 368,884 versus 164,160. The prime number test, which can be sensitive to clock speed and cache, still favors AMD by 59.6%, with 91 versus 57.

What the data implies is that the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS does not just outperform the Core 3 201E; it roughly doubles the Intel part’s output in most multi-threaded scenarios. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 41,963, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel processor averages 19,056, landing in the 73rd percentile. The nearest rivals for the AMD part include the Intel Core i7-14700T with an average score of 41,914 (0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 with 42,055 (-0.2% delta), showing it sits in a competitive mid-range tier. The Intel Core 3 201E, by contrast, sits near the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with 19,047 (0% delta) and the Intel Core i5-12400F with 19,039 (0.1% delta), placing it in a much lower performance bracket.

FAQ

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and the Intel Core 3 201E?

A: The largest delta is recorded in PassMark random string sorting, where the AMD processor leads by 151.2%, scoring 44,668 against Intel’s 17,783. PassMark extended instructions shows a nearly identical gap at 151.1%, with 27,714 versus 11,035.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the Intel Core 3 201E comes close to the AMD processor?

A: The closest result is in PassMark single-thread performance, where the AMD part scores 3,920 and the Intel part scores 3,482, a delta of 12.6%. This is the only test with a single-digit or low-double-digit gap; all other tests show at least a 25.3% difference.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 25,165, while the Intel Core 3 201E scores 12,613, giving the AMD part a 99.5% advantage. The single-core R23 result is 3,552 versus 1,780, a 99.6% delta.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores and percentiles for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has an average benchmark score of 41,963 and sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 201E has an average score of 19,056 and sits in the 73rd percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock, and does that matter in the results?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 201E boosts to 4.80 GHz. The higher boost clock on the AMD part contributes to its single-thread lead, though the core count difference plays a larger role in multi-threaded tests.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201E win any head-to-head test?

A: No. The recorded data shows the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons, with the Intel Core 3 201E recording 0 wins.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS wins in every measured category, making the use-case split rather one-sided. For users running heavily multi-threaded workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, or software compilation, the AMD part’s advantage is overwhelming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,165 versus 12,613 suggests it can handle roughly twice the rendering throughput. PassMark integer math, floating point math, and data compression all show leads above 90%, indicating strong all-around compute capability.

The Intel Core 3 201E does show a relatively smaller deficit in single-threaded tasks. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3,482 trails the AMD part’s 3,920 by only 12.6%, which means for lightly threaded applications like older games or simple office tasks, the Intel chip would not feel dramatically slower. However, even in PassMark physics, which often reflects gaming-related simulation, the AMD part leads by 25.3%. The data does not support a scenario where the Intel processor is the better choice for any workload, except perhaps where its lower power envelope or specific platform features matter more than raw performance.

The AMD processor also holds a clear edge in encryption and compression tasks, with deltas of 144.3% and 124.7%, respectively. For database workloads or file archiving, the Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS would complete tasks in a fraction of the time. The Intel part, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, simply lacks the parallel throughput to match. Users who prioritize any form of compute density should select the AMD part based on the recorded data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201E uses 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 4.00 GHz for AMD and 3.60 GHz for Intel, with boost clocks of 5.20 GHz and 4.80 GHz, respectively. Thermal design power differs as well: the AMD part is rated at 45 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 60 watts, meaning the AMD chip delivers higher performance at a lower rated power draw.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is rated at 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe configuration differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 CPU-only lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The integrated graphics are different as well, with AMD featuring the Radeon 780M and Intel featuring UHD Graphics 730.

The market segments are distinct: the AMD part is listed as Mobile, while the Intel part is listed as Desktop. Sockets also differ, with AMD using Socket FP7 and Intel using Socket 1700. The AMD processor has a larger die size at 178 mm² compared to Intel’s 163 mm², and it uses a different transistor count, with AMD listing 25,000 million transistors while Intel does not provide a figure. The release dates differ as well, with AMD launching on 2024-04-15 and Intel launching on 2025-01-12. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134, which can be stated once for reference, though no pricing analysis is offered here.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is substantial. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is built on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, and manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. This is a modern, high-density node that allows for high clock speeds at relatively low power. The Intel Core 3 201E uses Bartlett Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. The node difference explains some of the performance gap, as the smaller process node typically enables better power efficiency and higher transistor density, though the Intel part’s larger process node is offset by its lower core count.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The AMD part allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. While Intel’s per-core cache amounts are larger, the AMD part’s total L3 cache is higher at 16 MB versus 12 MB, which helps in multi-threaded workloads that share data. The transistor count of 25,000 million on the AMD part, compared to no listed figure for Intel, suggests a more complex design overall.

The integrated graphics also represent an architectural difference. The AMD Radeon 780M is a more powerful iGPU solution, likely benefiting from the Zen 4 platform’s unified memory architecture, while the Intel UHD Graphics 730 is a more basic implementation. The PCIe generation difference, Gen 4 for AMD and Gen 5 for Intel, is notable: Intel’s newer PCIe standard offers higher potential bandwidth for compatible devices, but the benchmark data does not include tests that would isolate this advantage. The memory bandwidth difference, 89.6 GB/s for AMD versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel, is a direct architectural consequence of the memory controller designs.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the superior processor in every measured test. Its 17 wins out of 17 comparisons, with an average benchmark score of 41,963 against 19,056, places it in a different performance class. The Intel Core 3 201E sits in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part reaches the 88th percentile, and the nearest rivals for each confirm the gap: the AMD processor trades blows with the Intel Core i7-14700T, while the Intel part matches the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS.

Users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, such as content creators, data analysts, or developers, should choose the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,165 is nearly double the Intel part’s 12,613, and its PassMark multi-thread score of 30,378 versus 14,839 confirms the trend. The AMD part also wins decisively in single-core performance, with a 12.6% lead in PassMark single-thread, meaning there is no scenario where the Intel chip offers a performance advantage.

The Intel Core 3 201E does have some attributes worth noting for specific use cases. Its lower core count and higher TDP of 60 watts suggest it may be aimed at simpler desktop tasks, and its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives platform flexibility. Its PCIe Gen 5 interface, with 16 lanes, could be relevant for users with Gen 5 storage or expansion cards, though the benchmarks do not capture that benefit. The launch MSRP of $134 indicates a budget-oriented positioning, but the data shows that in pure performance terms, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is the clear winner across every recorded workload.