AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs Intel Core i7-13705H Comparison

The benchmark data splits this mobile CPU duel nearly down the middle: the Intel Core i7-13705H takes 8 wins, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS takes 7. However, the margin of victory in those wins matters more than the count. The Intel chip delivers decisive, often massive, advantages in heavy multi-core and single-core workloads, while the AMD counters with a broader, if narrower, set of wins in specialized tasks. The result is a clear split: Intel for raw compute power, AMD for specific data-processing efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation occurs in the Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core i7-13705H scores 15998 against the AMD's 11515, a commanding 38.9% lead. The single-core result is even more lopsided: Intel's 2258 beats AMD's 1514 by 49.1%. This is the single largest performance gap in the entire comparison. The older Cinebench R15 test, however, tells a different story. There, AMD wins both multi-core (1913 vs 1612, a 15.7% lead) and single-core (239 vs 227, a 5% lead). The data suggests that as the Cinebench workload scales in complexity from R15 to R23, the Intel architecture's advantage grows exponentially.

Outside of Cinebench, the Intel chip continues to dominate in raw compute. In PassMark's floating-point math test, Intel scores 63064, a 31.1% advantage over AMD's 48096. The physics test shows an even wider gulf, with Intel's 1854 outpacing AMD's 1043 by 77.8%. Prime number finding is the most extreme outlier: Intel's score of 116 is more than double AMD's 56, a 107.1% delta that points to a massive architectural edge in this specific integer workload. In the more general PassMark multi-thread test, Intel wins 24460 to 22775, a solid 7.4% margin.

AMD's wins are concentrated in data-centric tasks. The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS leads in data compression (282624 vs 273720, a 3.2% margin) and data encryption (17837 vs 16324, an 8.5% margin). Its largest victory comes in extended instructions, where it scores 18897 to Intel's 15810, a 16.3% lead. AMD also edges out Intel in integer math (88124 vs 85927, a 2.5% lead) and random string sorting (29350 vs 29285, a marginal 0.2% lead). In single-threaded PassMark, Intel wins narrowly, 3483 to 3400, a 2.4% difference. The overall average benchmark scores are nearly identical — Intel's 32076 vs AMD's 31850 — confirming these are closely matched processors with very different strengths.

Architecture Differences

The divergence in performance traces directly to fundamentally different designs. The Intel Core i7-13705H is built on Raptor Lake architecture, using a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It packs 14 cores and 20 threads, a hybrid configuration that leverages both performance and efficiency cores. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Zen 3+ architecture (codenamed Rembrandt), fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads, all based on a monolithic design.

Cache configurations also differ sharply. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a large 24 MB shared L3 cache. AMD counters with 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache and per-core L2 allocation support its multi-core dominance. Process technology favors AMD, with the smaller 6 nm node versus Intel's 10 nm, and AMD's die size is smaller at 208 mm² versus Intel's 257 mm². Both support dual-channel memory, but AMD exclusively supports DDR5 with a stated bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 without a bandwidth figure.

PCIe connectivity is another key differentiator. Intel offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). This means AMD has more total lanes for peripherals, though Intel's are faster per lane. Integrated graphics also differ: Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while AMD uses Radeon 680M. Both are mobile parts with active production status. The Intel chip has a 45W TDP and launches on Intel BGA 1744 socket, while AMD runs at a lower 35W TDP on AMD Socket FP7. Intel's launch date is January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $502; AMD's release date is April 18, 2022, with no MSRP listed.

The Verdict

Choose the Intel Core i7-13705H if your priority is raw computational throughput. The data is unambiguous: it delivers a 38.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a 49.1% lead in single-core, and a 31.1% lead in floating-point math. Its 107.1% advantage in prime number finding and 77.8% lead in physics tests make it the clear choice for workloads that stress the CPU's arithmetic and simulation capabilities. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration provides a structural advantage in heavily parallel tasks, supported by a larger 24MB L3 cache.

Choose the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS for data manipulation and security-focused workloads. It wins in data compression, data encryption, and extended instructions, with leads of 3.2%, 8.5%, and 16.3% respectively. Its higher base clock of 3.30 GHz (versus Intel's 2.40 GHz) and lower 35W TDP suggest better efficiency for sustained data processing. The 6 nm process node and support for faster DDR5 memory with a specified bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s also point to a design optimized for memory-intensive tasks rather than raw core count.

Both processors sit at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores differ by less than 1%. This is not a case of one being objectively superior. It is a fork in the road: Intel for compute-heavy applications like rendering, simulation, and scientific computing; AMD for data pipelines, encryption, and compression tasks where its architectural efficiency shines.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H wins decisively with a score of 15998 compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 11515, a 38.9% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS win any benchmark by a significant margin?

A: Yes, it leads by 16.3% in PassMark extended instructions (18897 vs 15810) and by 15.7% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (1913 vs 1612), though these margins are far smaller than Intel's largest wins.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do their TDP ratings compare?

A: The Intel chip has a 45W TDP, while the AMD chip has a lower 35W TDP, indicating AMD may be more power-efficient under sustained loads.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry, while AMD uses a smaller 6 nm process fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which chip has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-13705H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 16 MB on the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13705H is the clear winner in compute-intensive parallel workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core lead of 38.9% and floating-point math advantage of 31.1% make it ideal for 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific simulations. The physics test win of 77.8% further reinforces its strength in collision detection and rigid body dynamics. The prime number finding result, more than double AMD's score, indicates a massive edge in integer-heavy algorithms. For users running multi-threaded productivity suites, the 7.4% PassMark multi-thread lead (24460 vs 22775) confirms Intel's general-purpose muscle.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS wins where data is the primary input. Its data compression lead of 3.2% and encryption lead of 8.5% make it suitable for database management, file archiving, and VPN or secure communication tasks. The 16.3% advantage in extended instructions suggests better support for specialized instruction sets like AES and AVX, which are common in cryptography and multimedia codecs. Its narrow wins in integer math (2.5%) and random string sorting (0.2%) indicate a more efficient data pipeline for in-memory operations. The higher base clock of 3.30 GHz also suggests better responsiveness in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive tasks.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every core specification. Intel offers 14 cores and 20 threads versus AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel's base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost of 5.00 GHz; AMD's base is 3.30 GHz with a boost of 4.90 GHz. TDP differs at 45W for Intel and 35W for AMD. Sockets are incompatible: Intel BGA 1744 versus AMD Socket FP7. Architecture is Raptor Lake for Intel versus Zen 3+ for AMD. Process node is 10 nm at Intel versus 6 nm at TSMC. Die size is 257 mm² for Intel versus 208 mm² for AMD.

Cache hierarchies are distinct: Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3; AMD has 64 KB L1, 512 KB L2, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support shows Intel accepting both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD only supports DDR5 with a specified bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. PCIe versions differ: Intel uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes, AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel versus Radeon 680M for AMD. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and both are locked (multiplier unlocked: false). Intel has a launch MSRP of $502; AMD has none listed.