AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins 10 of the 15 recorded comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS wins 5.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 20445 versus 11515 for the AMD, a 43.7% advantage for Intel in that test.

Q: In which areas does the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS outperform the Intel?

A: The AMD wins in data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, integer math, and random string sorting, with its largest margin being 25.1% in data encryption.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Do both processors use the same memory type?

A: No. The AMD supports DDR5 only, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD is built on a 6 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design approaches and platform targets. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is a mobile part from the 6000 series, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt. It uses an 8-core, 16-thread configuration and is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PTE, by contrast, is a desktop processor with the codename Bartlett Lake, using a 12-core, 24-thread layout and a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, a much larger 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel more than double the total L3 capacity, which can benefit workloads with large working sets.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The AMD supports only DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s. The Intel also supports ECC memory, while the AMD does not.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD pairs its CPU with a Radeon 680M graphics solution, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. PCIe connectivity also diverges: the AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, whereas the Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel's socket is LGA 1700, and its market segment is desktop; the AMD uses AMD Socket FP7 and targets mobile.

Both processors are currently listed as active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD's base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost of 4.90 GHz, while the Intel's base clock is much lower at 1.40 GHz but boosts to 5.50 GHz. The Intel's TDP is 45 watts, versus 35 watts for the AMD.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE dominates in raw compute throughput and single-threaded responsiveness. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20445 is nearly double the AMD's 11515, making it the clear choice for CPU-bound rendering, video encoding, and other heavily threaded production workloads. Its single-core advantage is equally pronounced: 2886 versus 1514 in Cinebench R23 single-core, a 47.5% lead. This translates to snappier application launches and better performance in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office suites, and legacy software.

The Intel also excels in physics calculations, scoring 1917 in Passmark physics versus 1043 for the AMD, a 45.6% lead. Prime number finding is another Intel strength, with a score of 142 versus just 56, a 60.6% advantage. Floating-point math also favors Intel, with 60673 versus 48096, a 20.7% edge. For users running scientific simulations, financial modeling, or any workload that stresses FPU throughput, the Intel is the stronger option.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, despite losing the overall benchmark count, wins in several specific workloads that matter for security and data handling. Its data encryption score of 17837 beats the Intel's 14253 by 25.1%, making it the better choice for VPNs, disk encryption, and secure communications. Extended instructions also favor the AMD, with 18897 versus 15952, an 18.5% lead, which benefits multimedia codecs and certain cryptographic algorithms. Data compression is an AMD win at 282624 versus 258704, a 9.2% margin. Integer math also goes to the AMD, 88124 versus 82411, a 6.9% advantage. Random string sorting is a narrow AMD win as well, 29350 versus 28973.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights only the fields where the two processors differ.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS | Intel Core 9 273PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Not specified |

| Codename | Rembrandt | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L1 Cache (per core) | 64 KB | 80 KB |

| L2 Cache (per core) | 512 KB | 2 MB |

| L3 Cache (shared) | 16 MB | 36 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2022-04-18 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $549 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows the starkest separation between the two. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel's 20445 score dwarfs the AMD's 11515, a 43.7% delta. Cinebench R23 single-core is even more lopsided in percentage terms: 2886 versus 1514, a 47.5% lead for Intel. Cinebench R15 tells the same story: Intel wins multi-core 2060 to 1913 (7.1% ahead) and single-core 290 to 239 (17.6% ahead). The Intel also holds a 20.7% edge in Passmark floating-point math, scoring 60673 versus 48096.

The Passmark multithread test is closer, with Intel at 24054 and AMD at 22775, a 5.3% margin. The single-thread Passmark test is nearly tied: Intel scores 3433, AMD scores 3400, a 1% difference. This suggests that in everyday lightly threaded tasks, the two are almost indistinguishable despite the Intel's higher boost clock.

The AMD's wins are concentrated in data-centric workloads. Passmark data encryption is its biggest victory: 17837 versus 14253, a 25.1% lead. Extended instructions follow at 18.5% (18897 versus 15952). Data compression shows a 9.2% AMD edge (282624 versus 258704). Integer math is 6.9% in AMD's favor (88124 versus 82411). Random string sorting is a narrow 1.3% win for AMD (29350 versus 28973). The Intel's wins in prime number finding (60.6%) and physics (45.6%) are the largest margins in either direction across the entire benchmark set.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split based on workload and platform. The Intel Core 9 273PTE is the superior processor for multi-core rendering, physics simulation, and single-threaded performance. Its 43.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 47.5% lead in single-core make it the obvious pick for content creators, engineers, and anyone running CPU-intensive desktop applications. The 45.6% advantage in physics and 60.6% edge in prime number finding reinforce this conclusion.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, despite being a mobile chip with fewer cores, wins decisively in encryption (25.1%) and extended instructions (18.5%), making it a compelling option for security-focused tasks, data compression, and integer-heavy workloads. Its 9.2% data compression win and 6.9% integer math advantage show that not all multi-threaded work favors Intel. The AMD also offers a lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts, which matters for thermal-constrained environments.

For desktop users seeking maximum compute throughput, the Intel Core 9 273PTE is the data-backed choice. For mobile users or workloads centered on encryption and data handling, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS holds specific advantages that cannot be ignored. The Intel's launch MSRP is $549, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD. Both processors sit at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating comparable overall standing despite their different strengths.