AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and Intel Core 7 240H are both mobile processors aimed at high-performance laptops, but the benchmark data reveals two very different performance profiles. The Intel Core 7 240H wins the majority of head-to-head tests, taking 10 of 15 comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS secures 5 wins. However, the nature of those victories tells a more nuanced story than the raw win count suggests, with Intel dominating in multi-threaded and single-threaded compute while AMD shows clear strengths in specific data-processing workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive Intel victory comes in the PassMark physics test, where the Core 7 240H scores 1723 against the Ryzen’s 1043, a 39.5% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and indicates a substantial lead in simulated physics calculations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows a similar pattern, with Intel scoring 15764 versus AMD’s 11515, a 27% gap. The Cinebench R15 multi-core result reinforces this trend, with Intel ahead by 18.9% (2360 vs 1913). These are not marginal differences; the Intel part is delivering roughly a quarter to a third more multi-threaded rendering performance.

The single-core picture also favors Intel, though by narrower margins. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel leads 1719 to 1514, an 11.9% difference. The PassMark single-thread test shows a 10.1% Intel advantage (3782 vs 3400), and Cinebench R15 single-core is a closer 4% gap (249 vs 239). The PassMark floating-point math test adds another Intel win, with a score of 58905 versus 48096, an 18.3% lead. Intel also takes the PassMark find-prime-numbers test by a wide 45.1% margin (102 vs 56) and the PassMark multithread test by 5% (23975 vs 22775).

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, despite losing the overall count, wins where it matters for specific workloads. Its largest victory is in PassMark data encryption, where it scores 17837 against Intel’s 15155, a 17.7% advantage. It also leads in PassMark extended instructions by 11.8% (18897 vs 16897) and in PassMark integer math by 9.6% (88124 vs 80396). The data compression test goes to AMD by a modest 4% (282624 vs 271774), and random string sorting is a narrow 1.7% win (29350 vs 28866). Notably, the AMD part does not win a single Cinebench test, indicating that its strengths are concentrated in specific instruction-level and data-manipulation tasks rather than general rendering workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 240H is the clear choice for compute-heavy, multi-threaded applications. Its wins in Cinebench R15 and R23 multi-core tests, alongside the PassMark multithread and physics tests, point to strong performance in rendering, simulation, and other parallel workloads. The single-core wins in Cinebench R23, PassMark single-thread, and Cinebench R15 suggest it also handles lightly-threaded tasks like everyday responsiveness and legacy software better. The floating-point math advantage further cements Intel’s position for scientific and engineering calculations that rely heavily on FPU throughput.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, conversely, excels in data-centric and security-related tasks. Its lead in data encryption is particularly notable, suggesting an edge in cryptography and secure communication workloads. The extended instructions win indicates better performance with newer SIMD instruction sets, which can benefit multimedia processing and certain database operations. Integer math and data compression wins point to strengths in general data processing, archiving, and perhaps some database workloads. The random string sorting victory, while small, hints at efficiency in sorting and indexing tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Intel Core 7 240H, in contrast, uses the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-H) on a 10 nm Intel process. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a lower base clock of 2.50 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part’s higher core count and boost clock likely contribute to its multi-threaded and single-threaded advantages, while the AMD part’s smaller process node may contribute to its efficiency in certain workloads.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a larger 24 MB of shared L3. The larger L2 and L3 caches on Intel could explain its lead in cache-sensitive workloads like physics and floating-point math. The AMD part supports only DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel part also features PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, whereas AMD uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which could affect expansion and storage connectivity.

Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part features the Radeon 680M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The TDP also varies, with AMD rated at 35 W and Intel at 45 W, though this is a thermal design power specification rather than a performance metric. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $502, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H is significantly faster, leading by 27% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (15764 vs 11515) and by 18.9% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (2360 vs 1913).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, it wins 5 of 15 head-to-head tests, including PassMark data encryption (17837 vs 15155, a 17.7% lead), data compression (282624 vs 271774, a 4% lead), and integer math (88124 vs 80396, a 9.6% lead).

Q: How do the single-core scores compare?

A: Intel leads in every single-core test. The biggest gap is in PassMark single-thread (3782 vs 3400, a 10.1% advantage), while the smallest is in Cinebench R15 single-core (249 vs 239, a 4% advantage).

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to the AMD part’s 4.90 GHz.

Q: What are the process nodes for these chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is built on a 6 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Core 7 240H uses a 10 nm Intel process.

Specification Differences

• Cores: AMD 8, Intel 10
• Base Clock: AMD 3.30 GHz, Intel 2.50 GHz
• Boost Clock: AMD 4.90 GHz, Intel 5.20 GHz
• TDP: AMD 35 W, Intel 45 W
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7, Intel BGA 1744
• Architecture: Zen 3+ vs Raptor Lake
• Process Node: 6 nm (TSMC) vs 10 nm (Intel)
• L1 Cache: 64 KB (per core) vs 80 KB (per core)
• L2 Cache: 512 KB (per core) vs 2 MB (per core)
• L3 Cache: 16 MB (shared) vs 24 MB (shared)
• Memory Support: DDR5 only vs DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s vs not specified
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes vs Gen 5, 8 Lanes
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 680M vs Iris Xe Graphics 64EU
• Release Date: 2022-04-18 vs 2024-12-17
• Launch MSRP: Not specified vs $502

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core 7 240H for users who prioritize raw compute performance. Its wins in all Cinebench tests, including a 27% lead in R23 multi-core and an 11.9% lead in R23 single-core, make it the superior choice for rendering, video encoding, and general productivity. The 39.5% lead in PassMark physics and 18.3% lead in floating-point math further solidify its position for simulation and scientific workloads. For anyone running CPU-intensive applications that scale across cores or benefit from high single-thread performance, the Intel part is the data-backed recommendation.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, however, is not without merit. Its 17.7% lead in data encryption and 11.8% lead in extended instructions suggest it may be better suited for specific security, database, and SIMD-optimized workloads. The 9.6% integer math advantage and 4% data compression lead also indicate competence in data processing tasks. Users whose workflows are dominated by these specific operations might find the AMD part competitive, despite its overall lower average benchmark score (31850 vs 31483). Both processors sit at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, indicating they are both high-performing parts. The choice ultimately depends on whether the workload is general compute (choose Intel) or specialized data manipulation (consider AMD).