AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H vs Intel Core i7-13650HX Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

CORE STATE Rembrandt
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-13650HX

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-HX
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.6 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,153
2,477
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
260
349
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
13,501
24,580
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,615
3,470
geekbench_multicore
9,571
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,996
N/A
passmark_data_compression
297,936
383,943
passmark_data_encryption
18,673
21,649
passmark_extended_instructions
20,302
23,146
passmark_find_prime_numbers
62
103
passmark_floating_point_math
48,821
75,643
passmark_integer_math
87,132
102,929
passmark_multithread
23,770
30,704
passmark_physics
1,115
1,745
passmark_random_string_sorting
30,859
41,162
passmark_single_thread
3,326
3,769
passmark_singlethread
3,326
3,769
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
8,060
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
1,988
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
3,698
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
5,871
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
8,741
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
1,015
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,731
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,514

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H vs Intel Core i7-13650HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and Intel Core i7-13650HX are both high-end mobile processors aimed at performance laptops, yet the benchmark data reveals a starkly one-sided contest. While the AMD chip holds its own in the broader market with an average benchmark score of 33,201, the Intel part counters with a nearly identical 33,089 average. However, in direct head-to-head testing, the Core i7-13650HX dominates every single metric, leaving the Ryzen PRO without a single win in the comparative suite.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-13650HX’s advantage is sweeping and significant across all tested workloads. The most dramatic gap appears in multi-threaded rendering, where the Intel chip scores 24,580 in Cinebench R23 multi-core against the AMD's 13,501, a staggering 45.1% deficit for the Ryzen 9 PRO. Single-core performance tells a similar story: Intel leads Cinebench R23 single-core with 3,470 versus 1,615, a 53.5% difference that is the largest margin in the entire comparison. This is not a marginal victory; it is a generational leap in per-thread capability.

The pattern persists in legacy rendering tests. In Cinebench R15, the Intel part scores 2,477 multi-core and 349 single-core, while the AMD manages 2,153 and 260, respectively, yielding 13.1% and 25.5% deficits. The trend extends to synthetic math workloads. In PassMark floating point math, Intel posts 75,643 versus AMD’s 48,821, a 35.5% advantage. Integer math shows a smaller but still clear 15.3% lead for Intel (102,929 vs. 87,132). Prime number finding, a test sensitive to core count and clock speed, sees Intel at 103 vs. AMD’s 62, a 39.8% gap.

Memory and data-heavy tasks also favor Intel decisively. PassMark data compression scores 383,943 for Intel versus 297,936 for AMD (22.4% faster), while data encryption shows a 13.7% lead (21,649 vs. 18,673). Extended instruction set performance is 12.3% higher on the Intel part (23,146 vs. 20,302). Random string sorting, another memory-latency sensitive test, gives Intel a 25% edge (41,162 vs. 30,859). Even the closest contest, PassMark single-thread, ends with a clear Intel win at 3,769 vs. 3,326, an 11.8% margin. In every one of the 15 head-to-head tests, the Core i7-13650HX is the winner.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the data, the Intel Core i7-13650HX wins in every measurable category, but the magnitude of its victory varies by workload type. The largest leads come in multi-core rendering and single-core performance, suggesting that the Intel part is particularly strong in applications that rely on both high clock speeds and thread parallelism. The 45.1% Cinebench R23 multi-core lead and the 53.5% single-core lead indicate that the Core i7 is the superior choice for 3D modeling, video encoding, and any task where every frame or second matters. The 39.8% lead in prime number finding and 35.5% lead in floating-point math further reinforce its dominance in scientific computing and financial modeling.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, despite having zero head-to-head wins, still posts respectable absolute scores. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3,326 is not far off the Intel’s 3,769, meaning it can handle everyday productivity tasks without noticeable lag. In data encryption, the 13.7% deficit is the smallest of any multi-threaded test, suggesting that its Zen 3+ architecture retains some efficiency in cryptographic workloads. However, the data does not support any use case where the Ryzen PRO outperforms the Intel chip. The only conceivable advantage is qualitative: the AMD part’s integrated Radeon 680M graphics is far more capable than Intel’s UHD Graphics 710 for light gaming without a discrete GPU, though this is not quantified in the benchmark scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is built on the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, and manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It packs 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Intel’s Core i7-13650HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-HX, on Intel’s 10 nm process. It offers significantly more hardware resources: 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The core count disparity is the primary driver of the multi-threaded benchmark gaps.

Cache hierarchies also differ markedly. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, a much larger 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. This larger cache footprint likely contributes to Intel’s advantages in data compression and random string sorting. Memory support diverges as well: AMD supports only DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with a stated bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with no bandwidth figure provided. The Intel part also supports ECC memory, whereas the AMD does not.

Other platform differences are notable. The AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, while Intel uses Intel BGA 1964. AMD’s PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), whereas Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with the same 20 lanes, giving it a potential bandwidth advantage for next-gen GPUs and SSDs. The TDPs differ, with AMD at 45 W and Intel at 55 W, indicating the Intel part is likely hungrier for power. The Intel chip is also multiplier-unlocked, while the AMD is not, and its launch MSRP is $485, a figure that appears only as a factual data point. The AMD’s integrated graphics, Radeon 680M, is a substantial step up from Intel’s UHD Graphics 710, but this is not reflected in the CPU benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-13650HX is the superior processor in every benchmarked workload. For users who demand maximum multi-threaded throughput, the 45.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 39.8% lead in prime number finding make it the only rational choice. Content creators, engineers, and data scientists will see dramatically faster render times and simulation results. The 53.5% single-core lead also means snappier application responsiveness and better performance in lightly-threaded software. If your priority is raw performance and you can tolerate the higher TDP, the Core i7-13650HX is the clear pick.

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H does have a place, but it is a niche one. Its 45 W TDP suggests it could be more power-efficient in sustained workloads, potentially translating to longer battery life in thin-and-light laptops. Its Radeon 680M integrated graphics are qualitatively far superior to the Intel UHD Graphics 710, offering a viable path for casual gaming without a discrete GPU. However, there is no benchmark in this data set where the AMD chip wins. The only scenario where it might be preferable is if a laptop chassis with the AMD part offers significantly better thermals or battery life, but those factors are outside the scope of these scores. For any user who cares about CPU performance, the Intel Core i7-13650HX wins outright.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 24,580, which is 45.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H’s 13,501.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H better in any single benchmark?

A: No. According to the head-to-head data, the Intel Core i7-13650HX wins all 15 tests, with the AMD losing by margins ranging from 11.8% (PassMark single-thread) to 53.5% (Cinebench R23 single-core).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-13650HX has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-13650HX supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H does not.

Q: What is the difference in their average benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has an average benchmark score of 33,201, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX has an average of 33,089. The AMD is 0.3% ahead in this metric, but this is not reflected in any individual head-to-head test.

Q: What is the boost clock speed for both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and the Intel Core i7-13650HX have a maximum boost clock of 4.90 GHz.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 PRO 6950H
i7-13650HX
Core Specs
Cores
8
14 +75.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2.6 -21.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
4.9 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2.6 -21.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
4.9 0.0%
Multiplier
33
26 -21.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
55 +22.2%
PL1
—
55 W
PL2
—
157 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3+
Raptor Lake
Codename
Rembrandt
Raptor Lake-HX
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX)
Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Die Size
208 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
Intel BGA 1964
Chipsets
—
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
1900 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 680M
UHD Graphics 710
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$485
Part Number
100-000000541100-000000563
SRMED
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Details View Core i7-13650HX Details