AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H vs Intel Core i7-12700 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

CORE STATE Rembrandt
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3+
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-12700

CORE STATE Alder Lake-S
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 25 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE —

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,153
3,151
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
260
272
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
13,501
21,751
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,615
1,894
geekbench_multicore
9,571
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,996
N/A
passmark_data_compression
297,936
375,950
passmark_data_encryption
18,673
20,143
passmark_extended_instructions
20,302
24,184
passmark_find_prime_numbers
62
101
passmark_floating_point_math
48,821
81,191
passmark_integer_math
87,132
106,554
passmark_multithread
23,770
30,273
passmark_physics
1,115
1,558
passmark_random_string_sorting
30,859
38,970
passmark_single_thread
3,326
3,864
passmark_singlethread
3,326
3,864
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
8,764
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
1,987
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
3,824
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
6,775
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
9,446
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
1,012
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,639
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,501

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H vs Intel Core i7-12700

The comparison between the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and the Intel Core i7-12700 is defined by a decisive sweep in the benchmark data. Across all 15 head-to-head tests, the Intel Core i7-12700 records the higher score, with the AMD part trailing in every single category. The overall average benchmark scores reflect this gap: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H posts an average of 33201, while the Intel Core i7-12700 posts an average of 32942, though the percentile ranking for both is identical at 83. This creates an interesting dynamic where the AMD processor, despite losing every direct comparison, still holds a slightly higher aggregate score due to the weighting of its benchmark suite, yet the head-to-head data leaves no ambiguity about which chip performs better in matched workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-12700’s dominance is most pronounced in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 21751 against the AMD’s 13501, a delta of -37.9%. Similarly, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel leads with 3151 versus 2153, a -31.7% difference. These are substantial margins that indicate a clear advantage in rendering and heavily threaded tasks. PassMark’s multi-thread test confirms the trend, with Intel scoring 30273 and AMD at 23770, a -21.5% gap. The floating-point math test shows the largest single disparity: Intel scores 81191 while AMD manages 48821, a delta of -39.9%. The find prime numbers test also shows a significant lead for Intel at 101 versus 62, a -38.6% difference.

Single-threaded performance tells a similar story, though with smaller margins. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 1894 against AMD’s 1615, a -14.7% delta. The PassMark single-thread test shows Intel at 3864 and AMD at 3326, a -13.9% gap. Cinebench R15 single-core is the closest contest, with Intel at 272 and AMD at 260, a -4.4% difference. This suggests that while Intel wins every head-to-head, its advantage narrows considerably in lightly threaded tasks. The data also shows consistent wins for Intel in memory-sensitive operations: data compression (375950 vs 297936, -20.8%), random string sorting (38970 vs 30859, -20.8%), and extended instructions (24184 vs 20302, -16.1%). Integer math shows a more moderate lead for Intel at 106554 versus 87132, an -18.2% delta, while data encryption is the closest overall benchmark, with Intel at 20143 and AMD at 18673, a -7.3% difference. Physics simulation also favors Intel, with a score of 1558 versus 1115, a -28.4% gap.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectural approaches. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i7-12700 uses the Alder Lake architecture, specifically Alder Lake-S, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The core configurations differ significantly: AMD provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel provides 12 cores and 20 threads. This core count disparity is the primary driver behind the multi-threaded benchmark results. The cache hierarchies also differ. AMD allocates 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 16 MB L3 cache. Intel allocates 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with a larger shared 25 MB L3 cache.

Process node and die size also separate the chips. AMD’s die measures 208 mm², while Intel’s is slightly larger at 215 mm². Memory support diverges as well: AMD supports only DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, though the fact pack does not list a specific bandwidth figure for the Intel part. The PCIe interface differs, with AMD using Gen 4 and 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: AMD includes the Radeon 680M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 770. The market segments are distinct, with AMD positioned as a mobile processor and Intel as a desktop processor. The power envelopes reflect this, with AMD rated at 45W TDP and Intel at 65W TDP.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-12700 wins every single head-to-head test, with 15 wins and 0 for the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. For users prioritizing raw performance in any measurable workload, the Intel part is the correct choice based strictly on the numbers. The Intel processor is particularly strong in multi-threaded and floating-point tasks, where its additional cores and threads yield advantages of roughly 30% to 40% over the AMD chip. Even in single-threaded tests, where the gap is smallest, Intel still leads by a meaningful margin, ranging from 4.4% to 14.7% depending on the benchmark. The AMD processor’s only statistical claim is its slightly higher average benchmark score (33201 vs 32942) and its identical 83rd percentile ranking, but this does not translate into a single head-to-head victory. Therefore, the data supports picking the Intel Core i7-12700 for any application where benchmark scores are the primary criterion. The AMD part’s advantages lie outside the performance metrics, such as its lower TDP and mobile orientation, which are not reflected in these specific test results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700 scores 21751, while the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 13501, giving Intel a 37.9% advantage.

Q: What is the closest benchmark contest between the two?

A: The closest contest is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where Intel scores 272 and AMD scores 260, a difference of only 4.4%.

Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of core count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-12700 has 12 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Do both processors have the same overall percentile ranking?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H and the Intel Core i7-12700 are ranked at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Which processor performs better in passmark floating point math?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700 scores 81191, whereas the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 48821, marking the largest single benchmark gap at 39.9%.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth listed for the AMD processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel Core i7-12700 does not have a bandwidth figure listed.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the head-to-head data, the Intel Core i7-12700 wins in every category tested, so the distribution of wins is entirely one-sided. The Intel part’s largest victories are in multi-threaded and computationally intensive workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core (37.9% ahead), PassMark floating-point math (39.9% ahead), and PassMark find prime numbers (38.6% ahead). It also leads decisively in physics simulation (28.4% ahead), multithread performance (21.5% ahead), and integer math (18.2% ahead). Memory-related tasks also favor Intel, with data compression and random string sorting both showing a 20.8% lead. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H does not have a single benchmark win, but its closest relative performance is in single-threaded Cinebench R15 (4.4% behind) and data encryption (7.3% behind). Therefore, the use-case split is clear: any workload that benefits from higher scores in these benchmarks favors Intel. The AMD part’s potential wins are not in the performance data but in its characteristics, such as a lower TDP of 45W versus 65W and a mobile market segment, which may be relevant for system-level considerations beyond raw benchmark output.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H | Intel Core i7-12700 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Alder Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt | Alder Lake-S |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 25 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $349 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 PRO 6950H
i7-12700
Core Specs
Cores
8
12 +50.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2.1 -36.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
4.9 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2.1 -36.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
4.9 0.0%
Multiplier
33
21 -36.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
25 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
45
65 +44.4%
PL1
—
65W
PL2
—
180W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3+
Alder Lake
Codename
Rembrandt
Alder Lake-S
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt))
Core i7 (Alder Lake-S)
Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Die Size
208 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP7
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
—
1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 680M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$349
Part Number
100-000000541100-000000563
SRL4Q
Package
FP7, FP7r2
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
Laminar RM1
View Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H Details View Core i7-12700 Details