AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and Intel Core 5 223PTE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of each processor?

A: Both processors share the same maximum boost clock of 5.40 GHz, despite having different base clocks (2.50 GHz for the AMD, 2.30 GHz for the Intel).

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which is significantly larger than the Intel Core 5 223PTE’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How do the manufacturing processes differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX supports DDR5 memory only, whereas the Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Is the Intel Core 5 223PTE overclockable?

A: No, the Intel Core 5 223PTE has a locked multiplier. In contrast, the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Fire Range codename, part of the 9000 series. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry.

The AMD chip features 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel chip features 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD’s L1 cache is 80 KB per core, and its L2 cache is 1 MB per core, with a large 64 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel’s L1 cache is also 80 KB per core, but its L2 cache is 2 MB per core, and its shared L3 cache is 24 MB.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD supports DDR5 only, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both have dual-channel memory buses and identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities are not equal. The AMD offers Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ too: the AMD uses Radeon 610M, and the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.

The AMD is a mobile processor on Socket FL1, while the Intel is a desktop processor on Socket 1700. The AMD has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel’s multiplier is locked. The AMD’s production status is Active, as is the Intel’s. Release dates differ, with the AMD dated 2025-01-05 and the Intel dated 2026-03-08.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two processors by workload class. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a high-end mobile part with 16 cores, 32 threads, and an average benchmark score of 91,199, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 223PTE is a desktop processor with 8 cores, 16 threads, and no recorded benchmark scores, placing it in the 50th percentile with an average score of 0.

For multi-threaded rendering, compilation, or data-heavy tasks, the AMD’s doubled core count and larger cache give it a decisive edge. For a desktop system where the user needs a locked, lower-power processor with DDR4 compatibility and a lower launch MSRP, the Intel fits that specific niche.

The AMD is the clear choice for mobile workstations that need maximum throughput. The Intel is a desktop part for more modest workloads where its lower 45 W TDP and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provide flexibility. The AMD’s 55 W TDP is higher, but its performance class justifies it.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category. The AMD has 16 cores and 32 threads; the Intel has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD’s base clock is 2.50 GHz, while the Intel’s is 2.30 GHz. Both share the same boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

The AMD’s TDP is 55 W, versus 45 W for the Intel. The AMD uses AMD Socket FL1, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD’s architecture is Zen 5 with the Fire Range codename; the Intel’s architecture is not specified but its codename is Bartlett Lake. The AMD is on a 4 nm process at TSMC; the Intel is on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Cache layouts are different. The AMD has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. The Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: the AMD is DDR5 only, the Intel is DDR4 and DDR5. Both have dual-channel buses and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and both support ECC.

PCIe lane counts differ: the AMD has 28 lanes, the Intel has 16 lanes, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 610M on the AMD, UHD Graphics 770 on the Intel. Market segment differs: the AMD is Mobile, the Intel is Desktop. The AMD has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel does not. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $232; the AMD has no launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and the Intel Core 5 223PTE. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores in any test category, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty.

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, however, has a full set of recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 37,159, and its single-core score is 2,174. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5,905 multicore and 336 single-core. PassMark results show 56,171 in multithread, 4,393 in single thread, 731,998 in data compression, 37,330 in data encryption, 57,946 in extended instructions, 287 in find prime numbers, 136,682 in floating point math, 212,598 in integer math, 2,720 in physics, and 77,890 in random string sorting.

Because the Intel has no recorded scores, direct comparison is impossible. The AMD’s average benchmark score of 91,199 and 96th percentile standing indicate strong performance, while the Intel’s 50th percentile and zero scores indicate that it has not been benchmarked in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX wins in every measured performance category, simply because it is the only one with recorded data. Its 16 cores and 32 threads make it suitable for heavily parallel workloads like rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing. The large 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for data-intensive tasks. The 4 nm process and unlocked multiplier also suggest headroom for advanced users, though the database does not include overclocking results.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins in areas where the AMD does not compete. It is a desktop processor, so it fits standard desktop motherboards with Socket 1700. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which gives builders the option to reuse older memory or adopt newer standards. Its 45 W TDP is lower than the AMD’s 55 W, which may be preferable for compact desktop builds with modest cooling. Its launch MSRP of $232 provides a reference price point, though the database does not indicate how that compares to the AMD’s market price.

The Intel’s locked multiplier means no overclocking, but its lower TDP and dual memory support are practical advantages for a mainstream desktop system. The AMD’s mobile segment designation means it is intended for laptops or small-form-factor systems, not standard desktop boards.

For users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, the AMD is the only option with recorded performance data. For users who need a desktop processor with flexible memory support and lower power draw, the Intel is the appropriate choice based on its specifications alone. The database shows no overlap in their intended use cases: one is a high-performance mobile chip, the other is a value-oriented desktop chip.