AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

CORE STATE Granite Ridge
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.3 Base / 5.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 128 MB
MAX TDP 170W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
16,374
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
2,549
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
4,963
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
9,259
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
17,184
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
1,292
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
6,536
2,507
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
350
354
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
42,018
24,880
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,259
3,512
geekbench_multicore
26,736
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
3,064
N/A
passmark_data_compression
908,421
339,133
passmark_data_encryption
44,536
18,385
passmark_extended_instructions
73,011
21,806
passmark_find_prime_numbers
613
138
passmark_floating_point_math
159,724
80,870
passmark_integer_math
243,209
114,158
passmark_multithread
70,255
29,271
passmark_physics
5,670
1,845
passmark_random_string_sorting
95,423
32,777
passmark_single_thread
4,737
3,955
passmark_singlethread
4,737
3,955
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,449
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,475

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs Intel Core 7 253PE

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear performance hierarchy between these two desktop processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D wins 13 of the 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the Intel Core 7 253PE takes only 2. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 75,779, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel chip averages 40,557, sitting in the 87th percentile. That is a substantial gap of 35,222 points in the average score, indicating the AMD processor delivers roughly 86.8% higher aggregate performance in the recorded tests.

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is the choice for workloads that demand heavy multi-threaded throughput, large data operations, and sustained computational load. Its 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 128 MB L3 cache and a 5.70 GHz boost clock, produce dominant results in every multi-core test recorded. The Intel Core 7 253PE, with 10 cores and 20 threads, cannot match that level of parallel processing power. However, the data shows the Intel part wins in Cinebench R15 single-core by a slim 1.1% margin, and in Cinebench R23 single-core it leads by 35.7%. This suggests the Intel architecture, built on Bartlett Lake at 10 nm, has a distinct single-thread efficiency advantage in those specific tests.

The AMD part targets users running rendering, physics simulations, data compression, encryption, and floating-point workloads. The Intel part, while less powerful overall, shows a specific strength in single-threaded Cinebench tests that may appeal to legacy single-thread applications. The Intel chip also uses a 65 W TDP compared to the AMD's 170 W, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which could matter for platform flexibility. The data does not indicate the Intel part is competitive for multi-threaded professional work; the AMD processor leads by 160.7% in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 68.9% in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D records an average benchmark score of 75,779, while the Intel Core 7 253PE records 40,557. The AMD part also ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the Intel part's 87th percentile.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 253PE win any benchmark comparisons?

A: Yes, the Intel part wins two of the fifteen head-to-head tests. It wins Cinebench R15 single-core with a score of 354 versus 350 for AMD, a 1.1% lead. It also wins Cinebench R23 single-core with 3,512 versus 2,259, a 35.7% advantage.

Q: How large is the multi-threaded performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 42,018 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel Core 7 253PE scores 24,880. The AMD part leads by 68.9% in that test.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel memory bus. The Intel Core 7 253PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel memory bus. Both have the same memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and the Intel Core 7 253PE have an active production status in the database.

Q: Do both processors include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D includes Radeon Graphics, while the Intel Core 7 253PE includes UHD Graphics 730.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses the Zen 5 architecture on the Granite Ridge codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 253PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. This process node difference is significant: the AMD part uses a more advanced node, which likely contributes to its higher transistor density and efficiency characteristics, though the exact transistor count for the Intel part is not listed in the database.

The AMD processor has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 20 threads. Both use an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but they differ in L2 and L3 cache allocation. The AMD part uses 1 MB of L2 per core and a 128 MB L3 cache. The Intel part uses 2 MB of L2 per core and a 33 MB shared L3 cache. This gives the AMD processor a massive L3 cache advantage, which is critical for data-heavy workloads that benefit from large on-chip storage.

The socket and platform requirements also differ. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core 7 253PE uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part offers 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, compared to the Intel part's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. Both support ECC memory, which is a feature relevant to professional and server-adjacent workloads.

The release dates in the database show the AMD processor was released in January 2025, while the Intel processor has a release date of March 2026. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which provides more flexibility for users with existing DDR4 platforms, whereas the AMD part requires DDR5.

Specification Differences

The specification table shows the following differences between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel Core 7 253PE has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The AMD part has a TDP of 170 W, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65 W. This is a notable difference in power envelope, though the database does not provide measured power consumption.

Core and thread counts differ significantly: 16 cores and 32 threads for AMD versus 10 cores and 20 threads for Intel. The L2 cache per core is 1 MB for AMD and 2 MB for Intel, though the AMD part compensates with a much larger L3 cache of 128 MB versus 33 MB for Intel. The process node is 4 nm for AMD (TSMC) and 10 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The AMD part has 16,630 million transistors and a die size of 2x 70.6 mm²; the Intel part does not have transistor or die size data recorded.

Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe lane counts differ: AMD provides 24 Gen 5 lanes, Intel provides 16 Gen 5 lanes. The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon Graphics, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, the Intel part does not. The launch MSRP for the AMD part is $699, and for the Intel part it is $384. The release date for AMD is January 2025, and for Intel it is March 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data reveals where each processor dominates. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D wins 13 of the 15 comparisons, and several of those wins are by very large margins. In PassMark find prime numbers, the AMD part scores 613 versus 138 for Intel, a 344.2% advantage. In PassMark extended instructions, AMD leads 73,011 to 21,806, a 234.8% margin. In PassMark physics, AMD scores 5,670 versus 1,845, a 207.3% lead. These are not close contests; the AMD processor is multiple times faster in these specific workloads.

In PassMark data compression, AMD scores 908,421 versus 339,133, a 167.9% lead. In PassMark random string sorting, AMD leads 95,423 to 32,777, a 191.1% margin. In PassMark data encryption, AMD scores 44,536 versus 18,385, a 142.2% lead. In PassMark multithread, AMD scores 70,255 versus 29,271, a 140% margin. In PassMark integer math, AMD leads 243,209 to 114,158, a 113% advantage. In PassMark floating point math, AMD scores 159,724 versus 80,870, a 97.5% lead. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD scores 6,536 versus 2,507, a 160.7% margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, AMD scores 42,018 versus 24,880, a 68.9% lead.

The two Intel wins are both in single-core Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel scores 354 versus 350 for AMD, a 1.1% margin. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 3,512 versus 2,259, a 35.7% margin. These wins show that the Intel part has a meaningful single-thread advantage in rendering-style workloads, despite having a lower boost clock (5.50 GHz versus 5.70 GHz for AMD). The PassMark single-thread test tells a different story: AMD scores 4,737 versus 3,955 for Intel, a 19.8% lead. This discrepancy between Cinebench single-core and PassMark single-thread suggests the Intel architecture performs better on the specific instruction patterns of Cinebench, while the AMD architecture is stronger on the broader PassMark single-thread workload.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D wins in every multi-threaded category recorded. Its 16-core, 32-thread configuration with a 128 MB L3 cache delivers decisive advantages in physics, data compression, encryption, integer math, floating-point math, and multi-threaded rendering. The PassMark multithread score of 70,255 versus 29,271 indicates the AMD part is the clear choice for parallel workloads. The 344.2% lead in prime number finding and the 234.8% lead in extended instructions further confirm its dominance in compute-heavy tasks. For users running 3D rendering, scientific simulations, or large data processing, the database shows the AMD processor is far superior.

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins in Cinebench R15 and R23 single-core tests. Its scores of 354 and 3,512 respectively outperform the AMD part by 1.1% and 35.7%. This indicates that for applications that rely heavily on single-threaded instruction execution, particularly those that mirror Cinebench's rendering workload, the Intel part may deliver faster response times. However, this advantage is narrow in R15 and does not extend to the PassMark single-thread test, where AMD leads by 19.8%. The Intel part also has a lower TDP of 65 W and supports DDR4 memory, which could influence platform choice for users with existing DDR4 motherboards or those prioritizing lower power envelopes.

The data does not show any benchmark where the Intel part wins in a multi-threaded test. Its 10-core, 20-thread configuration and 33 MB L3 cache cannot match the AMD part's parallel throughput. The Intel part's single-thread wins are real but limited to two specific tests. The overall benchmark averages confirm this: AMD at 75,779 versus Intel at 40,557. The AMD processor is the higher-performing part in the vast majority of measured workloads, while the Intel part offers a specific single-thread advantage in Cinebench tests and a more flexible memory support profile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 9950X3D
7 253PE
Core Specs
Cores
16
10 -37.5%
Threads
32
20 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.3
2.5 -41.9%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.7
5.5 -3.5%
Frequency (GHz)
4.3
2.5 -41.9%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.7
5.5 -3.5%
Multiplier
43
25 -41.9%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
128 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
170
65 -61.8%
PL1
65 W
PL2
219 W
PPT
230 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Granite Ridge
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 24 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
5.3 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$699
$384
Part Number
100-000000719
SA4QE
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Ryzen 9 9950X3D Details View Core 7 253PE Details