AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
Core 5 223PTE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs Intel Core 5 223PTE
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs Intel Core 5 223PTE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded database contains a full benchmark suite for the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark entries listed. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. Instead, the analysis must rely on the Ryzen 9 9950X’s measured performance, its percentile ranking, and the architectural specifications of both processors.
The Ryzen 9 9950X delivers a 3DMark 16-thread score of 16263, a 2-thread score of 2543, a 4-thread score of 4958, an 8-thread score of 9298, a max-thread score of 16780, and a single-thread score of 1293. In Cinebench R15, the multicore result is 6335 and the single-core result is 344. Cinebench R23 shows a multicore score of 40924 and a single-core score of 2202. Geekbench reports a multicore score of 25616 and a single-core score of 3029. PassMark tests include data compression at 896544, data encryption at 44366, extended instructions at 71564, find prime numbers at 345, floating point math at 159063, integer math at 242097, multithread at 66030, physics at 3279, random string sorting at 94368, and single-thread at 4737.
The Ryzen 9 9950X’s average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 74640. This places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all with scores very close to its own, include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 with an average score of 74761, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 with 74496, the AMD EPYC 4545P with 75373, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 with 75488. The differences are narrow: the Ryzen 9 9950X sits 0.2 percent below the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475, and 1.1 percent below the Intel Core Ultra 9 285. Against the Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, it is 0.2 percent higher, and against the EPYC 4545P, it is 1 percent higher. These small margins indicate that the Ryzen 9 9950X performs at a level comparable to those four processors, with no single rival holding a commanding lead.
Since the Intel Core 5 223PTE has no benchmark scores, the database records zero wins for each processor in head-to-head comparisons. The percentile ranking for the Intel part is 50, which places it at the median of all CPUs, but without measured scores, this ranking cannot be tied to specific test results. The Ryzen 9 9950X’s percentile of 94, by contrast, is supported by a full set of 23 benchmark entries.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Core 5 223PTE have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No, the database lists an empty benchmarks array for the Intel Core 5 223PTE. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its nearest rivals list is also empty.
Q: What is the Ryzen 9 9950X’s best single-thread result?
A: The highest single-thread score for the Ryzen 9 9950X is 4737 in the PassMark single-thread test, followed by 3029 in Geekbench single-core, 2202 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 1293 in 3DMark single-thread.
Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9950X compare to its closest rival in average score?
A: The Ryzen 9 9950X’s average benchmark score is 74640. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 74496, which is 0.2 percent lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 scores 74761, which is 0.2 percent higher. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75373, which is 1 percent higher. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, which is 1.1 percent higher.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The Ryzen 9 9950X supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.
Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?
A: No, the Ryzen 9 9950X has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE does not.
Q: What is the release date for each processor?
A: The Ryzen 9 9950X was released on 2024-08-14. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a release date of 2026-03-08.
Architecture Differences
The Ryzen 9 9950X uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Granite Ridge, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 16,630 million transistors across a die size of two 70.6 mm² chiplets. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded in the database.
Cache layouts differ substantially. Both processors have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the Ryzen 9 9950X, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 9950X, whereas the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 24 MB shared L3 cache. No 3D V-Cache is present on either processor.
The Ryzen 9 9950X features 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Ryzen part has a TDP of 170 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 45 watts.
Memory bandwidth is identical at 89.6 GB/s for both, with dual-channel memory buses. The Ryzen 9 9950X supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both support ECC memory.
PCIe connectivity differs. The Ryzen 9 9950X provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU alone. The Intel Core 5 223PTE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU alone.
Integrated graphics also differ. The Ryzen 9 9950X uses Radeon Graphics, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE uses UHD Graphics 770.
The socket and market position are distinct. The Ryzen 9 9950X uses AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel Core 5 223PTE uses Intel Socket 1700. Both are desktop parts and both are listed as Active in production status.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in core count: 16 cores for the Ryzen 9 9950X versus 8 cores for the Intel Core 5 223PTE. Thread counts are 32 versus 16. Base clocks are 4.30 GHz versus 2.30 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.70 GHz versus 5.40 GHz. TDP ratings are 170 watts versus 45 watts.
The process node is 4 nm for the Ryzen part and 10 nm for the Intel part. The foundry is TSMC for AMD and Intel for the Intel part. Transistor count is 16,630 million for the Ryzen 9 9950X, with no figure recorded for the Intel part. Die size is two 70.6 mm² chiplets for AMD, with no figure for Intel.
L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the Ryzen 9 9950X and 2 MB per core on the Intel Core 5 223PTE. L3 cache is 64 MB on the AMD part and 24 MB shared on the Intel part.
Memory support: DDR5 only for AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. PCIe lanes are 24 for AMD and 16 for Intel, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics for AMD and UHD Graphics 770 for Intel.
The Ryzen 9 9950X has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel Core 5 223PTE does not. The part numbers are 100-000001277 for AMD and SA4QL for Intel. The socket is AM5 for AMD and LGA 1700 for Intel. The launch MSRP for the Ryzen 9 9950X is $649, and for the Intel Core 5 223PTE it is $232.
Where Each One Wins
The Ryzen 9 9950X wins on raw multi-threaded performance, based on its recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924 and Geekbench multicore score of 25616 show strong throughput for heavily threaded workloads. The 3DMark max-thread score of 16780 and the PassMark multithread score of 66030 reinforce this pattern. The processor also shows strong single-thread results, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4737 and a Geekbench single-core score of 3029. These numbers place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 74640.
The Intel Core 5 223PTE wins in power efficiency, based on its TDP of 45 watts compared to 170 watts for the Ryzen 9 9950X. It also wins on memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, whereas the Ryzen 9 9950X supports only DDR5. The Intel part has a smaller core count of 8 versus 16, and a lower base clock of 2.30 GHz versus 4.30 GHz, which may lead to lower power draw in idle or lightly loaded scenarios. Its 2 MB per core L2 cache is larger than the 1 MB per core on the Ryzen part, which could benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads. The Intel part also has a lower launch MSRP of $232 compared to $649 for the AMD part.
The Intel Core 5 223PTE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its actual performance relative to the Ryzen 9 9950X cannot be measured from the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median, but this is not backed by any test data. The Ryzen 9 9950X, by contrast, has a percentile of 94 with full benchmark coverage.
The Verdict
The data shows a clear split. For workloads that depend on multi-core and single-core throughput, the Ryzen 9 9950X is the only option with measured performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 40924, Geekbench multicore score of 25616, and PassMark multithread score of 66030 demonstrate high sustained output across a broad range of tests. Its 16 cores and 32 threads provide a structural advantage over the 8 cores and 16 threads of the Intel Core 5 223PTE. The Ryzen part also has a higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz versus 5.40 GHz and a much larger L3 cache of 64 MB versus 24 MB.
For scenarios where power consumption is the primary constraint, the Intel Core 5 223PTE holds a specification-level advantage with a 45 watt TDP compared to 170 watts. It also offers broader memory compatibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support. The Intel part’s 2 MB per core L2 cache is double that of the Ryzen part, and its launch MSRP of $232 is lower than the $649 for the AMD part. However, without any benchmark scores in the database, the Intel Core 5 223PTE’s actual performance cannot be verified.
The Ryzen 9 9950X’s average benchmark score of 74640 and its position in the 94th percentile of all CPUs indicate that it belongs to the top tier of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD EPYC 4545P and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, sit within a 1.1 percent margin, which confirms that the Ryzen 9 9950X is competitive with those parts. The Intel Core 5 223PTE, in contrast, has no comparable data, so any performance-based selection must rely on the AMD part’s recorded results. The database therefore supports the Ryzen 9 9950X for users who need verified high-end performance, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE remains an unmeasured option with a lower TDP, dual memory support, and a lower launch MSRP.