AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX and Intel Core i7-14701E occupy very different positions in the database, and the recorded benchmark data reflects that divide clearly. The Ryzen 9 9850HX, a mobile processor from the 9000 series, posts an average benchmark score of 106,413, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. The Core i7-14701E, a desktop part from Intel’s Core 14th Gen lineup, averages 33,206, which lands in the 83rd percentile. The gap in raw performance is substantial, but the data also shows where each chip holds its ground, particularly in single-threaded tasks where the Intel part’s higher boost clock matters.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are one-sided. Out of 11 recorded comparisons, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins all 11. The largest margin appears in the extended instructions test, where AMD scores 53,817 against Intel’s 18,528, a delta of 190.5%. This suggests the Zen 5 architecture handles advanced instruction sets with significantly more efficiency than the Raptor Lake design. The data compression test shows a 134.1% advantage for AMD, with scores of 662,381 versus 282,939. Random string sorting follows closely at 140.7% in AMD’s favor, posting 70,175 against 29,158.

Integer math is another strong point for the Ryzen 9 9850HX. It scores 172,943, while the Core i7-14701E manages 81,325, a 112.7% difference. Floating point math shows an 86% lead for AMD, with 115,062 against 61,873. The multithread test, which often reflects core count and thread scheduling, gives AMD a 98.1% advantage: 51,722 versus 26,112. The encryption test shows a 116.2% delta, with AMD at 32,139 and Intel at 14,862. Prime number finding, a workload sensitive to clock speed and cache, still favors AMD by 83.5%, scoring 323 against 176.

The smallest win for AMD comes in the single-thread tests. Both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread entries show identical scores: 4,461 for AMD and 4,305 for Intel, a 3.6% delta. This is a narrow margin, but it is still a win. The physics test also shows a relatively modest gap of 27.3%, with AMD at 3,054 and Intel at 2,399. These results indicate that while the Ryzen 9 9850HX dominates in parallel workloads, its single-core advantage over the Core i7-14701E is slim, which makes the Intel part more competitive in lightly threaded scenarios.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split in use cases. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the stronger processor for multi-threaded, data-heavy, and instruction-intensive tasks. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 64 MB L3 cache, deliver scores that place it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon w7-3555, which scores 106,192 (a 0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 8324P at 103,329 (a 3% delta). The Ryzen 9 9850HX sits above these server-class parts in average score, which speaks to its high throughput.

The Intel Core i7-14701E, with 8 cores and 16 threads, is closer to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33,201, a 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33,244, a -0.1% delta). It also trails the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX by 0.3% and the Intel Core i7-13650HX by 0.4%. These rivals are all in the mobile or lower-end desktop range, which suggests the Core i7-14701E, despite being a desktop part, competes with more modest hardware in overall performance. The 3.6% single-thread edge for AMD is the only area where the Intel chip comes close, but even that is not enough to overturn the massive multi-core gap.

For a user focused on parallel processing, video encoding, or database work, the Ryzen 9 9850HX is the obvious choice based on the recorded scores. For a user who needs a desktop processor with a higher boost clock, the Core i7-14701E offers a 5.40 GHz maximum, but the benchmark data shows that advantage does not translate into a win in any recorded test.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX uses Zen 5, with the codename Fire Range, and is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It integrates 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i7-14701E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, on Intel’s 10 nm node, with a die size of 257 mm². The transistor count for the Intel part is not recorded in the database.

The cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD chip has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1 MB per core, and a 64 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 is 2 MB per core, and its L3 is 33 MB shared. The larger L3 on the AMD side likely contributes to its strong performance in data compression and random string sorting, where large working sets benefit from quick access to cached data.

Memory support also splits the two. The Ryzen 9 9850HX supports only DDR5, with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also on a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not listed. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for workstation or server use. The PCIe interface differs as well: AMD offers Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part also includes an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked.

The integrated graphics are different. AMD pairs the Ryzen 9 9850HX with a Radeon 610M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Neither is a primary focus of the benchmark data, but the presence of integrated graphics means both can output to a display without a discrete GPU.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most obvious specification gap. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is higher on the AMD part at 3.00 GHz versus 2.60 GHz, but the Intel part has a higher boost clock at 5.40 GHz versus 5.20 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is lower for AMD at 55 W, while Intel is rated at 65 W.

The socket types are entirely different. AMD uses Socket FL1, which is a mobile platform, while Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop platform. This means the two are not interchangeable in any system. The market segment confirms this: the Ryzen 9 9850HX is listed as Mobile, and the Core i7-14701E is listed as Desktop. The production status for both is Active, but the release dates differ: AMD was released on 2025-01-05, and Intel on 2024-06-30.

The process node is a key difference: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry. The die size for AMD is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², which suggests a chiplet design, while Intel’s is a monolithic 257 mm². The transistor count for Intel is not recorded, but AMD’s is 16,630 million. The memory support is narrower on AMD (DDR5 only) versus Intel (DDR4 and DDR5). The PCIe lane count is higher on AMD at 28 lanes versus Intel’s 16. The multiplier is unlocked on AMD and locked on Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: In the passmark single-thread test, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 4,461, which is 3.6% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701E’s 4,305.

Q: Does the Intel processor support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX supports DDR5 only.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX’s 5.20 GHz.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core i7-14701E is locked.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has an average benchmark score of 106,413, and the Intel Core i7-14701E has an average of 33,206.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins in every recorded benchmark, but the magnitude of the win varies. The largest advantages come in extended instructions (190.5%), random string sorting (140.7%), data compression (134.1%), integer math (112.7%), and encryption (116.2%). These are workloads that depend on high throughput, large caches, and efficient instruction handling. The AMD chip’s 64 MB L3 cache and 24 threads make it a strong fit for server-like tasks, content creation, and data processing. Its 97th percentile ranking places it among the top CPUs in the database, close to Xeon and EPYC parts.

The Intel Core i7-14701E does not win any head-to-head test, but its higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz keeps it within 3.6% of the AMD chip in single-thread performance. This makes it a reasonable choice for workloads that are lightly threaded and clock-sensitive, though the data does not show a win in any such test. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which gives system builders more memory flexibility. Its desktop socket and lower core count mean it fits into a different market segment, one that may prioritize legacy memory support or lower thread requirements.

The physics test shows the smallest gap after single-thread, with AMD leading by 27.3%. This suggests the Intel part is less far behind in simulation or physics-based tasks. The multithread test, however, shows a 98.1% gap, which reinforces the core count advantage of the AMD chip. For users who need a processor for multi-core rendering, virtual machines, or heavy compilation, the Ryzen 9 9850HX is the stronger choice. For users who are constrained to a desktop socket and want a higher boost clock, the Core i7-14701E offers a viable alternative, but the recorded data shows no benchmark where it takes the lead.