AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

CORE STATE Fire Range
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14490F

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
662,381
340,026
passmark_data_encryption
32,139
18,225
passmark_extended_instructions
53,817
21,731
passmark_find_prime_numbers
323
122
passmark_floating_point_math
115,062
66,558
passmark_integer_math
172,943
87,844
passmark_multithread
51,722
28,662
passmark_physics
3,054
2,093
passmark_random_string_sorting
70,175
35,608
passmark_single_thread
4,461
3,873
passmark_singlethread
4,461
3,873
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,318
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
327
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,660
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,363
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
23,000
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,247

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core i5-14490F

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX and the Intel Core i5-14490F occupy different corners of the processor market, yet comparing their recorded benchmark data reveals a consistent performance hierarchy. The database shows the AMD part winning all 11 head-to-head tests, with margins ranging from a modest 15.2% in single-thread workloads to a dominant 164.8% in prime number calculation. The average benchmark score for the Ryzen 9 9850HX sits at 106413, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs tracked, while the Core i5-14490F averages 38149, good for the 86th percentile. These figures establish the AMD processor as the stronger overall performer, but the size of that advantage varies sharply depending on the workload.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result in the comparison appears in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 53817 against the Intel chip's 21731, a difference of 147.7%. This category typically reflects AVX and other specialized instruction throughput, and the data indicates the Zen 5 architecture handles these workloads with far greater efficiency. Similarly, the find prime numbers test shows the AMD processor at 323 versus 122 for Intel, a 164.8% gap. That test is heavily dependent on integer throughput and cache behavior, so the margin points to a substantial architectural advantage rather than a small clock speed edge.

Integer math tells a similar story. The Ryzen 9 9850HX records 172943 in PassMark integer math, while the Core i5-14490F manages 87844, giving AMD a 96.9% lead. Random string sorting follows at 70175 versus 35608, a 97.1% difference. Data compression shows 662381 for AMD and 340026 for Intel, a 94.8% gap, meaning the AMD chip processes nearly twice as much compressed data in the same time. The floating point math test adds another large margin: 115062 versus 66558, a 72.9% advantage.

Multithreaded performance, often the headline metric for productivity comparisons, shows the Ryzen 9 9850HX scoring 51722 against 28662 for the Intel part, an 80.5% lead. That result aligns with the core and thread counts in the database, but the margin exceeds what a simple core count comparison would predict. The data encryption test shows 32139 for AMD versus 18225 for Intel, a 76.3% gap. Physics calculations, which often rely on a mix of integer and floating point work, show 3054 versus 2093, a 45.9% difference, the smallest multicore margin in the set.

The closest overall result is the single-thread test. The Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 4461, while the Core i5-14490F scores 3873, a 15.2% advantage for AMD. Even in a workload that minimizes core count advantages, the Zen 5 part leads by a clear margin. The Intel processor's best relative performance comes in this single-thread category, but it still trails. Across all 11 head-to-head tests, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX records 11 wins and 0 losses. No test in the database favors the Intel part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design schools. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Fire Range codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The transistor counts reflect this difference: the AMD chip packs 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die layout with each die measuring 70.6 mm², while the Intel part uses a single 215 mm² die with no transistor figure recorded in the database.

Core configurations differ significantly. The Ryzen 9 9850HX provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Core i5-14490F offers 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD processor also carries a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to 2.50 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost for the Intel chip. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: 1 MB per core for AMD versus 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache shows a significant divergence, with the AMD part holding 64 MB versus 24 MB shared on the Intel side.

The memory controllers also differ. The Ryzen 9 9850HX supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel access and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, plus ECC memory support. The Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure and no ECC support. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD processor provides Gen 5 with 28 CPU-only lanes, while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes.

Other notable differences appear in the integrated graphics and platform positioning. The Ryzen 9 9850HX includes a Radeon 610M iGPU, while the Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics. The AMD part targets the mobile segment and uses AMD Socket FL1, while the Intel part targets the desktop segment and uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel processor does not. Release dates also separate the two: the Ryzen 9 9850HX launched on 2025-01-05, while the Core i5-14490F launched on 2023-12-31.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX records an average benchmark score of 106413, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14490F averages 38149, placing it in the 86th percentile.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 4461 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Core i5-14490F scores 3873. That gives AMD a 15.2% lead, the smallest margin of any test in the comparison.

Q: What does the multithread score difference indicate?

A: The Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 51722 in the PassMark multithread test versus 28662 for the Intel chip, an 80.5% advantage. The AMD part provides 12 cores and 24 threads compared to 10 cores and 16 threads for Intel, but the score gap exceeds the 20% core count difference.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any head-to-head benchmark?

A: No. The database records 11 head-to-head tests, and the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins all 11. The Intel Core i5-14490F records 0 wins.

Q: How do the cache configurations compare?

A: Both use 80 KB L1 per core. The AMD chip uses 1 MB L2 per core and 64 MB L3, while the Intel chip uses 1.25 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. The AMD L3 cache is nearly three times larger.

Q: What are the memory support differences?

A: The Ryzen 9 9850HX supports DDR5 only with dual-channel access, 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory. The Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel access, but no bandwidth figure or ECC support is recorded.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications show several clear divides between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14490F uses 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks sit at 3.00 GHz for AMD and 2.50 GHz for Intel, with boost clocks at 5.20 GHz and 5.00 GHz respectively. The thermal design power differs, with the AMD part rated at 55 and the Intel part at 65.

The process nodes diverge sharply: 4 nm for the AMD chip, 10 nm for the Intel chip. The AMD processor uses TSMC as its foundry, while Intel fabricates its own chip. The die sizes also differ, with the AMD part using two 70.6 mm² dies and the Intel part using a single 215 mm² die. The transistor count is listed only for the AMD chip at 16,630 million.

Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3. The AMD chip provides 1 MB L2 per core and 64 MB L3, while the Intel chip provides 1.25 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support shows DDR5 only for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. The AMD chip records 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support, while the Intel chip has neither recorded. PCIe lanes differ as well: 28 CPU-only lanes for AMD versus 16 for Intel.

The integrated graphics situation is asymmetric. The Ryzen 9 9850HX includes a Radeon 610M, while the Core i5-14490F lists N/A. The AMD part is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FL1, while the Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, while the Intel multiplier is locked. Release dates are close, with the AMD part arriving on 2025-01-05 and the Intel part on 2023-12-31. Both processors remain in active production.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a decisive overall winner. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX leads in all 11 head-to-head tests, with an average score of 106413 compared to 38149 for the Intel Core i5-14490F. That places the AMD part 97th percentile versus 86th percentile for Intel. The nearest rivals for the AMD chip include the Intel Xeon w7-3555 at 106192, which is 0.2% behind, and the Intel Xeon w7-2595X at 108663, which is 2.1% ahead. The Intel Core i5-14490F sits in a different performance class entirely, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194, a 0.1% gap, and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221, a 0.2% gap.

The magnitude of the average score difference, roughly 2.8 times, suggests these processors serve different market segments despite their similar release timing. The Ryzen 9 9850HX competes with workstation-class Xeon parts, while the Core i5-14490F competes with mid-range desktop and mobile chips. The recorded data does not support any scenario where the Intel processor matches the AMD chip's throughput, even in single-thread workloads where the gap narrows to 15.2%.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins in every measured category. Its largest advantages appear in extended instructions, prime number finding, integer math, random string sorting, and data compression, all showing margins above 94%. These results indicate a processor optimized for compute-heavy, data-intensive workloads. The 64 MB L3 cache and 4 nm process likely contribute to these outcomes, though the database does not directly measure cache performance. The 24 threads and 5.20 GHz boost clock give it broad applicability across multithreaded and single-threaded tasks alike.

The Intel Core i5-14490F has no benchmark wins in the recorded data, but its closest result comes in single-thread performance. The 15.2% gap in that test is its smallest deficit, suggesting that for lightly threaded workloads, the Intel part is comparatively less disadvantaged. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which offers platform flexibility that the AMD part lacks, since the Ryzen 9 9850HX supports DDR5 only. The Intel part's lower thread count and smaller L3 cache align with its position in the 86th percentile, several tiers below the AMD processor's 97th percentile placement.

For users selecting between these two based strictly on the database, the choice depends on performance requirements. The Ryzen 9 9850HX delivers superior results in all recorded tests, with an average score of 106413. The Core i5-14490F, with an average score of 38149, cannot match that throughput in any measured workload. The data shows no workload category where the Intel processor takes the lead, making the AMD part the stronger option across the board.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 9850HX
i5-14490F
Core Specs
Cores
12
10 -16.7%
Threads
24
16 -33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
2.5 -16.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
3
2.5 -16.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Multiplier
30
25 -16.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
65 +18.2%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
148 W
PPT
61-101 W
—
Configurable TDP
45-75 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Fire Range
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 5 (Fire Range))
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
—
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FL1
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 5, 28 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
—
1800 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 610M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001366
SRN35
Package
µFC-BGAFL1
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 9 9850HX Details View Core i5-14490F Details