AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multithreaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 51,722 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 240.9% ahead of the Intel Core 7 350's 15,170. The AMD part wins all 11 recorded head-to-head benchmarks.

Q: How close are the two in single-threaded performance?

A: The gap is narrow. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX records 4,461 in the PassMark single-thread test, only 8.8% ahead of the Intel Core 7 350's 4,100.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has a TDP of 55 watts, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel part consumes far less power according to the specifications.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX supports DDR5 only, with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning it does not support simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What are the integrated graphics options?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX uses a Radeon 610M. The Intel Core 7 350 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Fire Range codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It contains 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on a 3 nm process by Intel's own foundry. The process node difference gives Intel a slight manufacturing advantage in density, but the AMD design compensates with a larger transistor budget.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD processor allocates 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 64 MB L3 cache. The Intel part uses 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 6 MB of shared L3. This means the AMD chip has over ten times the last-level cache, which directly benefits workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 350 does not. PCIe capability also differs: the AMD part offers Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes, whereas the Intel part offers Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel processor does not.

The AMD part is a 12-core, 24-thread design with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part is a 6-core, 6-thread design with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD chip also draws significantly more power, with a 55 W TDP versus 15 W for Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins all 11 recorded benchmark comparisons. The largest margin appears in integer math, where the AMD chip scores 172,943 against Intel's 33,734, a 412.7% advantage. Data compression shows a similar pattern: AMD scores 662,381 versus 143,123, a 362.8% lead. Extended instructions also heavily favor AMD, with 53,817 versus 12,045, a 346.8% difference.

Random string sorting gives AMD a 307.1% advantage (70,175 versus 17,238). Multithreaded performance shows AMD at 51,722 versus 15,170, a 240.9% lead. Prime number finding favors AMD by 201.9% (323 versus 107). Data encryption shows AMD ahead by 194% (32,139 versus 10,933). Floating point math gives AMD a 168.8% edge (115,062 versus 42,809), and physics simulation shows AMD at 3,054 versus 1,173, a 160.4% lead.

The closest contest is single-threaded performance. AMD scores 4,461 versus Intel's 4,100, a modest 8.8% advantage. This suggests that while the AMD core is faster per clock, the gap is not enormous when both are executing a single thread. However, in every other metric, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX delivers anywhere from roughly 1.6 times to over 5 times the performance of the Intel Core 7 350.

The average benchmark score reflects this dominance. The AMD chip records an average of 106,413, while the Intel part records 17,779. The AMD processor sits at the 97th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 71st percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX | Intel Core 7 350 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 6 |

| Threads | 24 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FL1 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Support | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 28 Lanes | Gen 4, 6 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | N/A | $469 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins every benchmark category recorded. The largest wins come in integer-heavy workloads, data compression, and extended instruction sets. This makes it the clear choice for compute-intensive tasks such as rendering, scientific simulation, large-scale data processing, and any workload that can use its 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache. The 412.7% lead in integer math and 362.8% lead in data compression indicate that the AMD part excels where parallel processing and large working sets matter.

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in power efficiency according to the specifications. With a 15 W TDP, it uses roughly a quarter of the power budget of the AMD part. Its single-channel memory and smaller L3 cache limit peak performance, but the lower power draw and support for LPDDR5X make it suited for fanless or ultra-portable designs where battery life takes priority over raw throughput. Its 8.8% single-thread deficit is small enough that everyday responsiveness should feel comparable, though the absence of multithreading limits heavily threaded tasks.

The Intel part also uses a 3 nm process and Gen 4 PCIe, which may integrate more easily into compact motherboards. The AMD part requires a socket FL1 board with Gen 5 PCIe support and a higher power delivery capacity. For users constrained by thermals or battery capacity, the Intel Core 7 350 offers a functional mobile experience. For users who need maximum computation, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the only option with meaningful headroom.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX outperforms the Intel Core 7 350 in every recorded test, with margins ranging from 8.8% in single-thread to over 400% in integer math. The AMD part delivers 12 cores, 24 threads, a 5.20 GHz boost clock, 64 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and Gen 5 PCIe. Its percentile ranking at 97 versus Intel's 71 reflects a processor designed for heavy lifting.

The Intel Core 7 350 is not without justification. Its 15 W TDP, 3 nm process, and support for LPDDR5X make it a low-power alternative. It costs $469 at launch MSRP, though the database does not provide a comparable price for the AMD part. The Intel chip also includes a newer integrated graphics solution with Xe3, which may be preferable for casual media use without a discrete GPU.

For any task that benefits from multiple threads, large caches, or high memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the decisive winner. For a system where power draw is the primary constraint and workloads are lightly threaded, the Intel Core 7 350 can serve, but it cannot compete on performance. The data shows no benchmark where the Intel part takes the lead. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the superior processor by every measured metric.