AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 7 253PQE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

CORE STATE Fire Range
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PQE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 5.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
662,381
487,335
passmark_data_encryption
32,139
25,515
passmark_extended_instructions
53,817
32,390
passmark_find_prime_numbers
323
206
passmark_floating_point_math
115,062
105,279
passmark_integer_math
172,943
137,795
passmark_multithread
51,722
41,656
passmark_physics
3,054
2,970
passmark_random_string_sorting
70,175
54,222
passmark_single_thread
4,461
4,389
passmark_singlethread
4,461
4,389
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
3,163
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
446
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
13,183
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,861
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
31,390
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
4,431

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 7 253PQE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins all 11 recorded head-to-head tests against the Intel Core 7 253PQE. The largest margin comes in extended instructions, where AMD posts 53,817 versus Intel's 32,390, a 66.2% advantage. This is not a narrow victory; it is a decisive sweep across every workload category measured.

Data compression shows AMD at 662,381 against Intel's 487,335, a 35.9% lead. Prime number finding favors AMD by 56.8% (323 versus 206), and random string sorting goes to AMD by 29.4% (70,175 versus 54,222). Integer math sees AMD at 172,943 versus 137,795, a 25.5% edge, while multithread performance is 24.2% higher at 51,722 compared to 41,656. Data encryption delivers a 26% win for AMD (32,139 versus 25,515).

The closest contests are in single-threaded performance and physics. AMD's single-thread score of 4,461 edges out Intel's 4,389 by just 1.6%, a margin that shows both processors are competitive for lightly threaded tasks. Physics is similarly tight: AMD scores 3,054 against Intel's 2,970, only 2.8% apart. Floating-point math is the third narrowest gap, with AMD at 115,062 versus 105,279, a 9.3% lead.

The overall average benchmark scores reinforce this picture. AMD's average is 106,413, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. Intel's average is 55,919, which puts it in the 91st percentile. The gap in average score is substantial, reflecting AMD's dominance in the PassMark suite. Intel's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900HX at 56,004 (0.2% below Intel) and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 at 56,273 (0.6% above Intel), showing Intel sits in a crowded mid-pack. AMD's nearest rival is the Intel Xeon w7-3555 at 106,192 (0.2% below AMD), indicating AMD competes at a much higher performance tier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most head-to-head benchmark tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins all 11 recorded head-to-head tests against the Intel Core 7 253PQE, with zero wins for Intel.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in extended instructions, where AMD scores 53,817 versus Intel's 32,390, a 66.2% advantage for AMD.

Q: Is there any benchmark where the two processors are nearly tied?

A: Yes, single-thread performance is the closest, with AMD at 4,461 and Intel at 4,389, a 1.6% difference. Physics is also close, with AMD at 3,054 and Intel at 2,970, a 2.8% gap.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: AMD's average benchmark score is 106,413, while Intel's is 55,919. AMD sits in the 97th percentile of all CPUs, while Intel is in the 91st percentile.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each processor?

A: For AMD, the nearest rival is the Intel Xeon w7-3555 with an average score of 106,192, just 0.2% below AMD. For Intel, the nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-14900HX at 56,004, 0.2% below Intel.

Q: Does Intel win any head-to-head test?

A: No, the recorded data shows Intel wins zero tests out of the 11 head-to-head benchmarks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, with the codename Fire Range. It is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor in the 9000 series. Intel uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry, and it is a 10-core, 20-thread desktop processor.

AMD's cache hierarchy uses 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 64 MB of L3 cache. Intel also uses 80 KB of L1 per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core, while its L3 is 33 MB shared. The larger L3 on AMD is notable for multi-threaded workloads, while Intel's larger per-core L2 could benefit certain single-thread access patterns. AMD's transistor count is 16,630 million across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm², while Intel does not report transistor count or die size in the database.

AMD supports only DDR5 memory, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe lane allocation differs: AMD has Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), while Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with AMD using Radeon 610M and Intel using UHD Graphics 770.

AMD's multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, while Intel's multiplier is locked. The production status is active for both. AMD's release date is January 5, 2025, while Intel's is March 8, 2026. AMD's part number is 100-000001366, and Intel's is SA4QA.

Specification Differences

The core count difference is the most fundamental: AMD has 12 cores and 24 threads, while Intel has 10 cores and 20 threads. This gives AMD a 20% advantage in core count and thread count. Clock speeds favor Intel on paper: Intel has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, while AMD has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Despite Intel's higher clocks, AMD wins all head-to-head benchmarks.

Thermal design power differs sharply: AMD is rated at 55 W, while Intel is rated at 125 W. This is a 70 W difference, making AMD significantly more power-efficient per the datasheet. Sockets are incompatible: AMD uses AMD Socket FL1, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes differ as well: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm from Intel.

Memory support is a differentiator: AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Cache configurations differ beyond the per-core L1 and L2: AMD has 64 MB of L3, while Intel has 33 MB shared L3. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD provides 28 Gen 5 lanes, while Intel provides 16 Gen 5 lanes. AMD's multiplier is unlocked, while Intel's is locked. The market segments differ, with AMD classified as mobile and Intel as desktop.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is the stronger performer in every recorded benchmark. It wins all 11 head-to-head tests, delivers a higher average benchmark score (106,413 versus 55,919), and sits in a higher percentile (97th versus 91st). The largest margins, such as 66.2% in extended instructions and 56.8% in prime number finding, are decisive enough that no workload category appears favorable to Intel.

The Intel Core 7 253PQE does have higher clock speeds and a higher TDP, but the benchmark results show these specifications do not translate into performance wins. Intel's lower core count (10 versus 12) and smaller L3 cache (33 MB versus 64 MB) likely contribute to its deficits in multi-threaded tests. The single-thread gap is small at 1.6%, suggesting Intel is competitive for lightly threaded tasks, but the multithread gap of 24.2% is substantial.

For users considering these processors, the AMD part offers better performance across the board, a lower TDP, and an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part offers higher clocks, DDR4 compatibility, and a desktop form factor. The recorded data does not show any scenario where Intel outperforms AMD, so the choice depends on other factors such as platform preferences, memory compatibility needs, or socket requirements, rather than benchmark performance.

Where Each One Wins

AMD wins every benchmark category in the head-to-head data. The strongest AMD advantages are in extended instructions (66.2% lead), prime number finding (56.8%), and data compression (35.9%). These results indicate AMD is particularly strong in workloads involving cryptographic operations, mathematical computation, and data processing. The multithread advantage of 24.2% suggests AMD is the better choice for heavily threaded applications such as rendering, compilation, or scientific computing.

AMD also wins integer math by 25.5% and random string sorting by 29.4%, indicating advantages in general-purpose processing and data manipulation. Floating-point math, data encryption, and physics are also AMD wins, though with smaller margins ranging from 2.8% to 26%. The single-thread win of 1.6% is the only area where Intel comes close, but it still does not secure a win.

Intel's closest performance relative to AMD is in single-threaded tasks and physics. The 1.6% single-thread gap and 2.8% physics gap suggest Intel can compete in lightly threaded scenarios, but it never overtakes AMD. Intel's higher boost clock of 5.70 GHz versus 5.20 GHz does not yield a single-thread win in the data. For users with workloads that rely heavily on single-thread speed, the difference is negligible, but for anything else, AMD holds the advantage. Intel does offer DDR4 support, which may be relevant for users with existing DDR4 memory, and a desktop socket that could fit different platform requirements, but these are compatibility considerations, not performance wins.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 9850HX
7 253PQE
Core Specs
Cores
12
10 -16.7%
Threads
24
20 -16.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
3.5 +16.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.7 +9.6%
Frequency (GHz)
3
3.5 +16.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.7 +9.6%
Multiplier
30
35 +16.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
125 +127.3%
PL1
—
253 W
PL2
—
253 W
PPT
61-101 W
—
Configurable TDP
45-75 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Fire Range
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 5 (Fire Range))
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
—
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FL1
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 28 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
—
5.5 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 610M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$409
Part Number
100-000001366
SA4QA
Package
µFC-BGAFL1
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 9 9850HX Details View Core 7 253PQE Details