AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

CORE STATE Fire Range
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 223PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
662,381
346,623
passmark_data_encryption
32,139
18,448
passmark_extended_instructions
53,817
24,672
passmark_find_prime_numbers
323
159
passmark_floating_point_math
115,062
76,468
passmark_integer_math
172,943
99,819
passmark_multithread
51,722
31,124
passmark_physics
3,054
2,493
passmark_random_string_sorting
70,175
35,798
passmark_single_thread
4,461
4,219
passmark_singlethread
4,461
4,219
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,666
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
376
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
11,111
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,568
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
26,455
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,734

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX vs Intel Core 5 223PE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data records a clean sweep for the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX, which wins all 11 head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core 5 223PE. The largest margin appears in extended instructions, where AMD delivers a score of 53,817 against Intel's 24,672, a 118.1% advantage. This result indicates a substantial lead in workloads that leverage advanced instruction sets, likely reflecting the architectural differences between the two processors.

Data compression shows a similarly dominant performance gap. The Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 662,381 versus 346,623 for the Core 5 223PE, a 91.1% delta. Random string sorting follows the same pattern, with AMD at 70,175 and Intel at 35,798, a 96% difference. These two tests point to a consistent advantage in memory-heavy and data-manipulation tasks, where the AMD part's larger cache configuration and higher core count likely play decisive roles.

Prime number finding, a test sensitive to integer throughput, shows AMD at 323 against Intel's 159, a 103.1% lead. Integer math itself records 172,943 for AMD versus 99,819 for Intel, a 73.3% margin. Encryption workloads also favor AMD heavily: 32,139 versus 18,448, a 74.2% delta. Floating-point math completes the set of large wins, with AMD at 115,062 and Intel at 76,468, a 50.5% advantage.

The multithreaded benchmark, which aggregates performance across all cores, shows AMD at 51,722 versus Intel's 31,124, a 66.2% lead. This aligns with the core count difference: 12 cores and 24 threads for AMD against 8 cores and 16 threads for Intel. The physics test, often correlated with gaming simulation workloads, shows a narrower but still clear margin: 3,054 for AMD versus 2,493 for Intel, a 22.5% delta.

Single-thread performance is the closest contest. AMD scores 4,461 while Intel manages 4,219, a 5.7% advantage for the Ryzen part. This slim margin suggests that per-core efficiency is comparable, with AMD holding a modest edge despite the larger architectural and process differences. The two single-thread entries in the data, labeled `passmark_single_thread` and `passmark_singlethread`, record identical values for each processor, confirming the consistency of the measurement.

In every recorded test, the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX outperforms the Intel Core 5 223PE. The deltas range from 5.7% in single-thread work to 118.1% in extended instructions, with most workloads showing margins above 50%. The Intel part's best showing is in single-thread performance, but it still trails AMD there. No benchmark in the head-to-head set favors the Core 5 223PE.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Fire Range codename, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 223PE belongs to the Bartlett Lake codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. This process difference likely contributes to the power and efficiency profiles, though the recorded TDP values tell a mixed story: AMD is rated at 55 watts while Intel is rated at 65 watts.

Cache configurations differ markedly. Both parts allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 allocation diverges: AMD provides 1 MB per core while Intel doubles that to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is where AMD takes a decisive lead, with 64 MB against Intel's 24 MB shared pool. For a 12-core part, AMD's larger L3 helps feed the additional cores and threads, which likely explains part of the multithreaded advantage.

Transistor count and die size are recorded only for AMD: 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die configuration of 2x 70.6 mm². No equivalent figures appear for Intel. Socket compatibility also separates the two: AMD uses Socket FL1, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, whereas the Intel multiplier is locked, indicating different overclocking headroom.

Memory support shows a split. AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported by both processors. PCIe lanes differ: AMD provides Gen 5 with 28 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a substantial difference for systems that rely on high-throughput expansion.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD pairs the Ryzen 9 9850HX with Radeon 610M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. Neither part's iGPU appears in the benchmark comparisons, so the data does not evaluate their relative graphical performance. Production status is active for both, but release dates are distinct: AMD launched on January 5, 2025, while Intel's release is recorded as March 8, 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data gives AMD a win in every head-to-head benchmark, so the use-case split is essentially defined by the magnitude of the advantage rather than by any Intel-led category. AMD's largest wins appear in extended instructions, data compression, random string sorting, and prime number finding, all with deltas above 90%. These are workloads that stress raw compute throughput, cache efficiency, and instruction-level parallelism, areas where the Zen 5 architecture with 12 cores and 64 MB of L3 cache excels.

Intel's closest contest is single-thread performance, where the 5.7% delta suggests that the Core 5 223PE is more competitive in lightly threaded applications. For tasks that rely heavily on one or two cores, such as legacy software or certain real-time workloads, the Intel part would trail only slightly. The physics test also shows a relatively smaller gap at 22.5%, which could indicate that the Intel part handles simulation-style workloads better than its other results suggest, though it still loses.

For multi-threaded productivity, content creation, and data-heavy tasks, the AMD part dominates by margins between 50% and 118%. The multithread score of 51,722 versus 31,124 confirms that AMD is the stronger choice for parallel workloads. The encryption benchmark, often relevant for security and database operations, also favors AMD by 74.2%. The Intel part's strengths are not visible in any recorded benchmark; its only relative advantage is that the single-thread gap is much narrower than the multithread gap.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field. Core and thread counts lead the list: AMD has 12 cores and 24 threads, while Intel has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are close, with AMD at 3.00 GHz and Intel at 2.90 GHz, but both boost to 5.20 GHz. TDP ratings differ, with AMD at 55 watts and Intel at 65 watts, a counterintuitive pairing given AMD's larger core count.

Cache specifications show the most dramatic divergence. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core. L2 cache per core doubles from 1 MB in AMD to 2 MB in Intel. L3 cache reverses the trend: AMD has 64 MB, Intel has 24 MB shared. Process node and foundry also differ: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm at Intel. AMD's transistor count is recorded at 16,630 million with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm²; no such figures exist for Intel.

Memory support splits: AMD supports only DDR5, Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel buses with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC support is present on both. PCIe lanes differ, with AMD offering 28 Gen 5 lanes versus Intel's 16 Gen 5 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 610M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel.

Socket and unlock status also differ. AMD uses Socket FL1 with an unlocked multiplier; Intel uses Socket 1700 with a locked multiplier. The market segment assignments differ as well: AMD is classified as Mobile, Intel as Desktop. Release dates are separate, with AMD earlier and Intel later. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $232; no launch MSRP appears for AMD.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the most benchmarks in the head-to-head comparison?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX wins all 11 head-to-head benchmarks recorded, with the Intel Core 5 223PE winning none.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The extended instructions benchmark shows the largest delta, with AMD at 53,817 and Intel at 24,672, a 118.1% advantage for AMD.

Q: How close is single-thread performance between the two?

A: Single-thread scores are 4,461 for AMD and 4,219 for Intel, a 5.7% lead for AMD, making it the narrowest margin in the comparison.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel buses with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: AMD has 64 MB of L3 cache, while Intel has 24 MB shared L3 cache. Intel has a larger L2 per core at 2 MB versus AMD's 1 MB.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 9850HX
5 223PE
Core Specs
Cores
12
8 -33.3%
Threads
24
16 -33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
2.9 -3.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.2 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3
2.9 -3.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.2 0.0%
Multiplier
30
29 -3.3%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
65 +18.2%
PL1
65 W
PL2
219 W
PPT
61-101 W
Configurable TDP
45-75 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Fire Range
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 5 (Fire Range))
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FL1
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 28 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 610M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$232
Part Number
100-000001366
SA4QF
Package
µFC-BGAFL1
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Ryzen 9 9850HX Details View Core 5 223PE Details